Skip to main content

Simultaneous Latent-Class Analysis Across Groups

  • Reference work entry
Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research

Synonyms

Multigroup latent-class analysis

Definition

Simultaneous latent-class analysis across groups (SLCAG) is an extension of the standard latent-class (LC) model (Latent Class Model) for the examination of measurement equivalence/invariance (Measurement Invariance). It can be used to compare the latent structure derived from a set of discrete item responses between multiple groups, for example, between males and females; between Japanese, Americans, and Dutch; between young and old; and between ill and healthy. Whereas the more commonly used multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MCFA) (Factorial Invariance) assumes that the underlying latent variables are continuous, SLCAG treats the latent variables (Latent Variables) either as nominal, for example, to identify a typological classification from a given set of categorical indicators, or as ordinal, for example, to investigate the scalability of a set of categorical indicators. These two specifications are sometimes referred as...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 6,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 9,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Clogg, C. C., & Goodman, L. A. (1985). Simultaneous latent structural analysis in several groups. In N. B. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 81–110). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eid, M., Langeheine, R., & Diener, E. (2003). Comparing typological structures across cultures by multigroup latent class analysis. A primer. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 195–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A. (1974). Exploratory latent structure analysis using both identifiable and unidentifiable models. Biometrika, 61, 215–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, S. J. (1979). Analysis of qualitative data: Vol. 2 New Developments. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaars, J. A. (1990). Categorical longitudinal data – Loglinear analysis of panel, trend and cohort data. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaars, J. A., & McCutcheon, A. L. (2002). Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kankaraš, M., Moors, G., & Vermunt, J. K. (2010). Testing for measurement invariance with latent class analysis. In E. Davidov, P. Schmidt, & J. Billiet (Eds.), Cross-cultural analysis: Methods and applications (pp. 359–384). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent structure analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutcheon, A. L., & Hagenaars, J. A. (1997). Comparative social research with multi-sample latent class models. In J. Rost & R. Langeheine (Eds.), Applications of latent trait and latent class models in the social sciences (pp. 266–277). Münster, Germany: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moors, G. (2004). Facts and artefacts in the comparison of attitudes among ethnic minorities. A multi-group latent class structure model with adjustment for response style behaviour. European Sociological Review, 20, 303–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Mplus user’s guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén and Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2004). GLLAMM Manual. U.C. Berkeley Division of Biostatistics Working Paper Series (Working Paper 160).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. K. (1997). LEM 1.0: A general program for the analysis of categorical data. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2005). Factor analysis with categorical indicators: A comparison between traditional and latent class approaches. In A. Van der Ark, M. A. Croon, & K. Sijtsma (Eds.), New developments in categorical data analysis for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 41–62). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miloš Kankaraš .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Kankaraš, M., Vermunt, J.K. (2014). Simultaneous Latent-Class Analysis Across Groups. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2711

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2711

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0752-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0753-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics