Abstract
Analysis of paleocommunity data poses a challenge because of its multivariate nature, containing counts of many species in many samples. Comparison of the abundance of a single species among all samples provides only incomplete information, whereas attempting to consider every species is impractical. Ordination methods are analytical techniques that reduce the original multivariate dataset to a few important components by creating new synthetic variables designed to explain the maximum amount of original data variability. The ultimate goal is to order the samples along ecologically or environmentally meaningful gradients in order to interpret differences in community structure. This chapter describes three of the most widely-used ordination methods, principal components analysis (PCA), detrended correspondence analysis (DCA), and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS), explaining the methodology of each and outlining their strengths and weaknesses for analysis of paleoecological data. The techniques are illustrated using Ediacaran paleocommunity data from Mistaken Point, Newfoundland. PCA relies on assumptions that are inappropriate for ecological data, such as the requirement that species abundances change in a linear fashion along the environmental gradient, and is not well suited for community ordination. In contrast, DCA and NMDS both perform well with ecological data; DCA incorporates a more ecologically-realistic measure of distance between samples but some of the detrending methods have been criticized, whereas NMDS only assumes a monotonic relationship between compositional similarity and gradient distance. The two methods also have complementary strengths, with DCA typically better at extracting the primary gradient and NMDS better at resolving the overall pattern.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson AJB (1971) Ordination methods in ecology. J Ecol 59:713–726
Austin MP (1976) Performance of four ordination techniques assuming three different non-linear species response models. Vegetatio 33:43–49
Beals EW (1984) Bray-Curtis ordination: an effective strategy for analysis of multivariate ecological data. Adv Ecol Res 14:1–55
Bonuso N, Newton CR, Brower JC et al (2002) Statistical testing of community patterns: uppermost Hamilton Group, Middle Devonian (New York State: USA). Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 185:1–24
Botquelen A, Gourvennec R, Loi A et al (2006) Replacements of benthic associations in a sequence stratigraphic framework, examples from the Upper Ordovician of Sardinia and Lower Devonian of the Massif Armoricain. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 239:286–310
Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27:325–349
Chardy P, Glemarec M, Laurec A (1976) Application of inertia methods to benthic marine ecology: practical implications of the basic options. Estuar Coast Mar Sci 4:179–205
Cisne JL, Rabe BD (1978) Coenocorrelation: gradient analysis of fossil communities and its applications in stratigraphy. Lethaia 11:341–364
Clapham ME, James NP (2008) Paleoecology of Early-Middle Permian marine communities in eastern Australia: response to global climate change in the aftermath of the late Paleozoic ice age. Palaios 23:738–750
Clapham ME, Narbonne GM, Gehling JG (2003) Paleoecology of the oldest-known animal communities: Ediacaran assemblages at Mistaken Point, Newfoundland. Paleobiology 29:527–544
Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143
Dominici S, Kowalke T (2007) Depositional dynamics and the record of ecosystem stability: early Eocene faunal gradients in the Pyrenean foreland, Spain. Palaios 22:268–284
Faith DP, Minchin PR, Belbin L (1987) Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69:57–68
Fasham MJR (1977) A comparison of nonmetric multidimensional scaling, principal components and reciprocal averaging for the ordination of simulated coenoclines and coenoplanes. Ecology 58:551–561
Gauch HG, Whittaker RH (1972) Comparison of ordination techniques. Ecology 53:868–875
Gauch HG, Whittaker RH, Singer SB (1981) A comparative study of nonmetric ordinations. J Ecol 69:135–152
Goodall DW (1954) Objective methods for the classification of vegetation. Aust J Bot 2:304–324
Gower JC (1966) Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53:325–338
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electronica 4:1–9
Hill MO, Gauch HG (1980) Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42:47–58
Holland SM (2005) The signatures of patches and gradients in ecological ordinations. Palaios 20:573–580
Holland SM, Miller AI, Meyer DL et al (2001) The detection and importance of subtle biofacies within a single lithofacies: the Upper Ordovician Kope Formation of the Cincinnati, Ohio region. Palaios 16:205–217
Jackson DA, Somers KM (1991) Putting things in order: the ups and downs of detrended correspondence analysis. Am Nat 137:704–712
James FC, McCulloch CE (1990) Multivariate analysis in ecology and systematics: panacea or Pandora’s box. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:129–166
Jongman RHG, ter Braak CJF, Van Tongeren OFR (1995) Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kenkel NC, Orloci L (1986) Applying metric and nonmetric multidimensional scaling to ecological studies: some new results. Ecology 67:919–928
Knox RG (1989) Effects of detrending and rescaling on correspondence analysis: solution stability and accuracy. Vegetatio 83:129–136
Kruskal JB (1964) Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29:1–27
McKinney FK, Hageman SJ (2006) Paleozoic to modern marine ecological shift displayed in the northern Adriatic Sea. Geology 34:881–884
Minchin PR (1987) An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 69:89–107
Oksanen J, Minchin PR (2002) Continuum theory revisited: what shape are species responses along ecological gradients? Ecol Model 157:119–129
Olszewski TD, West RR (1997) Influence of transportation and time-averaging in fossil assemblages from the Pennsylvanian of Oklahoma. Lethaia 30:315–329
Palmer MR (1993) Putting things in even better order: the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74:2215–2230
Peet RK, Knox RG, Case JS et al (1988) Putting things in order: the advantages of detrended correspondence analysis. Am Nat 131:924–934
Podani J, Miklós I (2002) Resemblance coefficients and the horseshoe effect in principal coordinates analysis. Ecology 83:3331–3343
Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rodriguez J (2004) Stability in Pleistocene Mediterranean mammalian communities. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 207:1–22
Scarponi D, Kowalewski M (2004) Stratigraphic paleoecology: bathymetric signatures and sequence overprint of mollusk associations from upper Quaternary sequences of the Po Plain, Italy. Geology 32:989–992
Shi GR (1993) Multivariate data analysis in palaeoecology and palaeobiogeography – a review. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 105:199–234
Tomasovych A, Siblik M (2007) Evaluating compositional turnover of brachiopod communities during the end-Triassic mass extinction (Northern Calcareous Alps): removal of dominant groups, recovery and community reassembly. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 244:170–200
Wartenberg D, Ferson S, Rohlf FJ (1987) Putting things in order: a critique of detrended correspondence analysis. Am Nat 129:434–448
Wood DA, Dalrymple RW, Narbonne GM et al (2003) Paleoenvironmental analysis of the late Neoproterozoic Mistaken Point and Trepassey formations, southeastern Newfoundland. Can J Earth Sci 40:1375–1391
Zuschin M, Harzhauser M, Mandic O (2007) The stratigraphic and sedimentologic framework of fine-scale faunal replacements in the middle Miocene of the Vienna basin (Austria). Palaios 22:285–295
Acknowledgments
Rodrigo Sala and Marc Laflamme assisted with data collection. Fieldwork in 2000 and 2001 in the Mistaken Point Ecological Reserve was carried out under Scientific Research Permits granted by the Parks and Natural Areas Division, Department of Tourism, Culture, and Recreation, Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. The original data collection was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) grant (to Guy M. Narbonne) and by an NSERC postgraduate scholarship (to Clapham). Thoughtful reviews from John Huntley, Richard Krause, and Amelinda Webb helped improve many aspects of this contribution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clapham, M.E. (2011). Ordination Methods and the Evaluation of Ediacaran Communities. In: Laflamme, M., Schiffbauer, J., Dornbos, S. (eds) Quantifying the Evolution of Early Life. Topics in Geobiology, vol 36. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0680-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0680-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-0679-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-0680-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)