Skip to main content

Modelling the Stroop Effect: Dynamics in Inhibition of Automatic Stimuli Processing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics (II)

Abstract

In this study, we simulate the dynamics of suppressing an automatic stimulus processing which interferes with a different non-automatic target task. The dynamics can be observed in terms of interference and facilitation effects that influence target response processing time. For this purpose, we use Hopfield neural network with varying attention modulation in a colour-word Stroop stimuli processing paradigm. With the biologically realistic features of the network, our model is able to model the Stroop effect in comparison to the human performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Folk, C.L., Remington, R.W., Johnston, J.C.: Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 18 (1992) 1030–1044.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stroop, J.R.: Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exp. Psychol. 18 (1935) 643–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, J.D., Dunbar, K., McClelland, J.L.: On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed account of the stroop effect. Psychol. Rev. 97(3) (1990) 332–361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Phaf, R.H., van der Heijden, A.H.C., Hudson, P.T.W.: SLAM: A connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks. Cogn. Psychol. 22 (1990) 273–341.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hopfield, J.: Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 9(2554) (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Popoviciu, N., Boncut, M.: On the Hopfield algorithm. Foundations and examples. General Math. 13(2) (2005) 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dunbar, K., MacLeod, C.M.: A horse race of a different color: Stroop interference patterns with transformed words. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 10 (1984) 622–639.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nooraini Yusoff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yusoff, N., GrĂ¼ning, A., Browne, A. (2011). Modelling the Stroop Effect: Dynamics in Inhibition of Automatic Stimuli Processing. In: Wang, R., Gu, F. (eds) Advances in Cognitive Neurodynamics (II). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9695-1_95

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics