Skip to main content

Developing Entrepreneurial Leaders

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Developing Successful Leadership

Part of the book series: Studies in Educational Leadership ((SIEL,volume 11))

Abstract

The value and importance of entrepreneurial leadership in education, unlike other facets of educational leadership, is very context-dependent and is also closely associated with individual personality attributes. As a consequence, development of entrepreneurial leadership requires at least as much attention to the current context of schooling systems and to the aptitudes of educators as to the curricula of entrepreneurial leadership development. Those two entrepreneur-relevant features are examined here and their implications for leadership development discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Segments of this chapter have been drawn from two previously published works of the author: Entrepreneurial leadership (2009), and K-12 Education, The Role of For-Profit Providers, with Gomez and Hentschke (2009).

  2. 2.

    Webster’s Dictionary as quoted from Leisey and Lavaroni, p. 28.

  3. 3.

    Baumol, 1993, p. 12, quoted from Myung Jae Moon (1999).

  4. 4.

    Drucker, 1985, p. 21, quoted from Myung Jae Moon (1999).

  5. 5.

    Kourilsky and Hentschke (2003) p. 117.

  6. 6.

    Throughout the chapter we refer to “educational entrepreneurs” rather than the redundant “entrepreneurial educational leaders.”

  7. 7.

    This form of reasoning presumes that educational entrepreneurs are largely “born” and not “made.” More accurately, their behavior is motivated more fundamentally by personal values and traits than by professional norms of educational leadership.

  8. 8.

    We///// drawn primarily on the work of Eggers and Leahy (1995)//// here as an illustration of the collective perception of entrepreneurs.

  9. 9.

    Eggers and Leahy.

  10. 10.

    Eggers and Leahy.

  11. 11.

    We draw here on the work of Hatch and Zweig (2000) to illustrate the major characteristics of entrepreneurs identified by social scientists.

  12. 12.

    Deal and Hentschke (2004).

  13. 13.

    Despite this fact, growing privatization of the education industry is likely to accelerate the emerging role of the types of for-profit education firms discussed in this chapter. See Hentschke and Wohlstetter (2007).

  14. 14.

    For a more extensive form of this analysis, see Hentschke (2007).

  15. 15.

    Charter School Facts, from http://www.edreform.com, accessed March 22, 2008.

  16. 16.

    In 2005–2006 Edison Schools alone estimated that it served more than 330 students in 25 states, the District of Columbia and the United Kingdom.

  17. 17.

    Precise counts are difficult to ascertain. Per one recent estimate by the Education Industry Association of//// approximately 15000 “educational learning centers and tutors in private ownership” currently operate in the United States. Among these, however, about one-half are “educational consultants,” about one-third “tutoring,” and the remainder divided between “educational service business” and “reading improvement instruction.”

  18. 18.

    For an in-depth discussion of these opportunities for educational entrepreneurs, see Hill (2003). Entrepreneurship in K-12 Public Education, in Kourilsky and Walstad (2003), pp. 65–96.

  19. 19.

    Pinchot III (1985).

  20. 20.

    This and the following arguments are drawn in large part from Brown and Cornwall (2000).

  21. 21.

    See Christensen (1997).

  22. 22.

    For examples, see Davies and Hentschke (2006). Public-private partnerships in education.

  23. 23.

    For elaboration on these programs see http://www.teachforamerica.org, http://www.nlns.org/ and http://www.broadfoundation.org.

  24. 24.

    See Bornstein (2004) as well as Kourilsky and Walstad (2003).

References

  • Allen, J., & Mitchell, S. (2006). Charter schools: Changing the face of American education today, Part 2: Raising the bar on charter school laws, 2006 ranking & scorecard (9th ed.). Washington, DC: The Center for Education Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Enterprise Institute (2009). Stimulating Excellence: Unleashing the Power of Innovation in Education. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J. (1993). Entrepreneurship, Management, and the Structure of Payoffs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, L., & Stevenson (2008) Barriers to entry: Tales from a tool builder. In F. Hess (Ed.), Educational entrepreneurship: possibilities for school reform (pp. 119–140). Cambridge, MA. Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, D. (2004). How to change the world: Social entrepreneurs and the power of new ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. J., & Cornwall, J. R. (2000). The entrepreneurial educator. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagnon, Y.-C. (2001, June). The behavior of public managers in adopting new technologies. Public Performance & Management Review, 24(4), 337–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chubb, J. E. (2006). The bias against scale and profit. In F. M. Hess (Ed.), Educational entrepreneurship: Realities, challenges, possibilities (pp. 224–245). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., & Hentschke, G. (2006, July). Public/private partnerships in education: insights from the field. School Leadership and Management. 26(3), 205–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deal, T. E., & Hentschke, G. C., with others. (2004). Adventures of charter school creators: Leading from the ground up. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (2006). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers, J., & Leahy, K. (1995, Summer). Entrepreneurial leadership. Business Quarterly, 59, 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, C., & Vanourek, G. (2008). Talent development: Looking outside the education sector. In F. Hess (Ed.), Educational entrepreneurship: Possibilities for school reform (pp. 23–44). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez, L., & Hentschke, G. (2009). The role of research in educational improvement. In J. Bransford, D. Stipek, N. Vye, L. Gomez, & D. Lam (Eds.), Educational improvement: What makes it happen and why? (pp. 137–159). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, J., & Zweig, J. (2000). What is the stuff of an entrepreneur? Ivey Business Journal, N/D 65(2), 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentschke, G. (2007). Characteristics of growth in the education industry: Illustrations from U.S. education businesses. In K. Leuze, K. Martens, & A. Rusconi (Eds.), New arenas of education politics: The impact of international organizations and markets on educational policymaking (pp. 176–194). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentschke, G. (2009). Entrepreneurial leadership. In D. Brent (Ed.), The essentials of school leadership (pp. 147–165, 2nd ed.). London: Sage .

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentschke, G., & Wohlstetter, P. (2007, January and March). K-12 Education in a broader privatization context. Educational Policy, 21(1). 297–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, F. (Ed.). (2006). Educational entrepreneurship: Realities, challenges, possibilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, F. (Ed.). (2008). Educational entrepreneurship: Possibilities for school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, E. (2008). Greaking regulatory barriers to reform. In F. Hess (Ed.), Educational entrepreneurship: Possibilities for school reform (pp. 225–246). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. T. (2003). Entrepreneurship in K-12 public education. In M. Kourilsky & W. Walstad (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship. (pp. 65–77). Dublin: Senate Hall Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffmann Foundation. (2009). Entrepreneurship education without boundaries: Kauffman campuses seek to make entrepreneurship education a college-wide experience. Retrieved on April 11, 2009, from http://www.kauffman.org/entrepreneurship/kauffman-campuses.aspx.

  • Kourilsky, M., & Hentschke, G. (2003). Educational entrepreneurship and covisionary multisectorism. In M. Kourilsky & W. Walstad (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 115–140). Dublin: Senate Hall Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kourilsky, M., & Walstad, W. (Eds.). (2003). Social entrepreneurship. Dublin: Senate Hall Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisey, D., & Lavaroni, C. (2000). The educational entrepreneur. San Rafael, CA: Edupreneur Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. (2006). Why is this so difficult. In F. M. Hess (Ed.), Educational entrepreneurship: Realities, challenges, possibilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maranto, R., & Maranto, A. (2006). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans: The role of organizational culture. In F. M. Hess (Ed.), Educational entrepreneurship: Realities, challenges, possibilities (pp. 145–164). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A. (1982). Additional aspects of entrepreneurial history. In C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship (pp. 15–19). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, M. (1999, January/February). The pursuit of managerial entrepreneurship: Does organization matter? Public Administration Review, 59(1), 31–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, F., & Cnaan, R. (1995, January/February). Entrepreneurship in the public sector. Public Administration Review, 55, 29–36, (Washington, DC).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinchot III, G. (1985). Intrapreneuring. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1979). The Theory of Economic Development. London: Transaction Books. (Original work published 1934).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vander Ark, T. (2009). Private capital and public education: Toward quality at scale. Working Paper 2009-01, AEI Fulture of American Education Project, Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute, 28 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. (2006). Opportunities, but a resistant culture. In F. M. Hess (Ed.), Educational entrepreneurship: realities, challenges, possibilities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guilbert C. Hentschke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hentschke, G.C. (2010). Developing Entrepreneurial Leaders. In: Davies, B., Brundrett, M. (eds) Developing Successful Leadership. Studies in Educational Leadership, vol 11. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9106-2_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics