Skip to main content

Geographies of Children’s Well-Being: in, of, and for Place

  • Reference work entry
Handbook of Child Well-Being

Abstract

There has been growing interest in the macro-geography of children’s well-being in recent years. Many influential studies, by respected scholars and international agencies, have demonstrated that children’s well-being comprises many components and that domain-specific and overall levels of well-being vary quite significantly, and often unexpectedly, from place to place. This chapter reinforces the central conclusion of this work – that children’s well-being is shaped by where they live. However, this chapter also extends the analysis by focusing attention on how, and by how much, place matters in shaping children’s well-being. It argues that “good places” for children are those which are (1) inclusive, presenting all children with equivalent experiences; (2) participative, affording children an active role; (3) environments of opportunity, providing appropriate spaces and facilities; and (4) resourced with key services. This knowledge is used to propose a taxonomy to assess the extent to which neighborhoods make positive contributions to children’s lives. To complement this tool which summarizes the offering of place (potential impact), a second evaluative tool is proposed to summary the extent of the impact of place on children (actual impact). Finally, a conceptual framework is proposed to situate the contribution of place alongside other factors that contribute to the well-being that children experience. In conclusion, it is contended that working toward improving children’s well-being inadvertently leads to the creation of places that better serve the needs of the wider population, children, and adults alike.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 3,499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ben-Arieh, A., & Frones, I. (2007). Indicators of children’s well being – concepts, indices and usage. Social Indicators Research, 80, 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., Hoelscher, P., & Richardson, D. (2007). An index of child well-being in the European Union. Social Indicators Research, 80, 133–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., et al. (2009). Local index of child well-being. London: Department for Communities and Local Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., Keung, A., Rees, G., & Goswami, H. (2011). Children’s subjective well-being: International comparative perspectives. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(4), 548–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton, E. (2011). The importance of the built environment to children’s well-being: What do we know? Cities, Health and Well-Being, November, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crivello, G., Camfield, L., & Woodhead, M. (2009). How can children tell us about their wellbeing? Exploring the potential of participatory research approaches within young lives. Social Indicators Research, 90, 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C. J., & Jones, M. (1994). The child friendly neighbourhoods: Some questions and tentative answers from Australian research. International Play Journal, 2, 79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Work and Pensions. (2003). Measuring child poverty: Final conclusions. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, T. (2009). Child well-being in rich countries: UNICEF’s ranking revisited, and new symmetric aggregating operators exemplified. Child Indicators Research, 2(3), 303–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsinger, A. (2012). Agenda for child-friendly neighbourhood planning. Policy recommendations for European cities to support children and young people. Stuttgart: Cities for Children Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurochild (2009). Indicators: an important policy tool for advancing child well-being. Eurochild Policy Briefing 05. Brussels: Eurochild.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurochild (2010). Children in alternative care. National Surveys. 2nd Edition. Brussels: Eurochild. (http://www.eurochild.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Publications/Eurochild_Reports/Eurochild%20Publication%20-%20Children%20in%20Alternative%20Care%20-%202nd%20Edition%20January2010.pdf)

  • Eurochild (2012). The 2012 National Reform Programmes and the National Social Reports from a Child Poverty and Child Well-Being Perspective. Brussels: Eurochild.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union, Social Protection Committee. (2009). Child poverty and well-being in the EU. Current status and way forward. Brussels: European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrar, I. (2005). Minimum standards for open space. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer, H., & Marlier, E. (2012). Current situation in relation to child poverty and child well-being: EU policy context, key challenges ahead and ways forward. Independent background paper prepared for the Cypriot EU Presidency conference on investing in children: Preventing and tackling child poverty and social exclusion, promoting children’s well-being. Nicosia, Cyprus, 18–19 Oct 2012. Brussels: European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, T. (2008). Space-oriented children’s policy: Creating child-friendly communities to improve children’s well-being. Children & Society, 22, 136–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleeson, B., & Spike, N. (Eds.). (2006). Creating child friendly cities: Reinstating kids in the city. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. (1979). Children’s experience of place. New York: Irvington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. (1997). Children’s participation: The theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heshmati, A., Bajalan, C., & Tausch, A. (2007), Measurement and analysis of child well-being in,middle and high income countries. IZA Document Paper 3203. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, M., Adams, J., & Whitelegg, J. (1990). One false move: A study of children’s independent mobility. London: Policy Studies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiscock, R., & Mitchell, R. (2011). What is needed to deliver places that provide good health to children? A report for Environmental determinants of public health in scotland (EDPHiS). A research project funded by the Scottish Government to support the “Good Places, Better Health” initiative. Edinburgh: EDPHiS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, S. L., & Valentine, G. (2000) Spatiality and the new social studies of childhood. Sociology: The Journal of the British Sociological Association, 34(4), 763–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horelli, L. (1998). Creating child-friendly environments. Case studies on children’s participation in three european countries. Childhood: A Global Journal of Child Research, 5(2), 225–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, P., & Pinch, S. (2009). Urban social geography. 6th Edition. Pearson. Harlow: England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kytta, M. (2004). The extent of children’s independent mobility and the number of actualized affordances as criteria for child-friendly environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 179–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKendrick, J. H. (2009). Constraints and opportunities in localities. In J. Qvortrup, W. Corsaro, & M. S. Honig (Eds.), The palgrave handbook of childhood studies (pp. 238–255). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelson, J., Abdallah, S., Steuer, N., Thompson, S., & Marks, N. (2009). National accounts of well-being: Bringing real wealth onto the balance sheet. London: New Economics Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. C. (1986). Childhood’s domain: Play and place in childhood development. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrom, M. (2010). Children’s views on child-friendly environments in different geographical, cultural and social neighbourhoods. Urban Studies, 47(3), 514–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2009). Comparative child well-being across the OECD. In OECD (Ed.), Doing better for children (pp. 21–63). Paris: OECD.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw, S. (1984). The modifiable areal unit problem. Norwich: Geo Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Percy Jones, B., & Malone, K. (2001). Making children’s participation in neighbourhood settings relevant to the everyday lives of young people. PLA Notes, 42, 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. Am Sociol Rev, 15(3), 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scotland, P. (2012). Getting it right for play: A toolkit to assess and improve local play opportunities. Edinburgh: Play Scotland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, S., & McKendrick, J. H. (2009). Child poverty in Scotland. Taking the next steps, JRF Viewpoint 2365, York: JRF. (http://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/files/jrf/poverty-children-scotland-viewpoint.pdf).

  • TARKI Social Research Institute (2010). Child poverty and child well-being in the European Union. Report for the European Commission, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities. Budapest: TARKI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon, P. S., Zhou, C., Sallis, J. F., Cain, K. L., Frank, L. D., & Saelens, B. E. (2012). Home environment relatiosnhips with children’s physical activity, sedentary time and screen time, by socioeconomic status. International Journal of Benhavioural Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9, 88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK Parliament (2012). Child Poverty Act 2012. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (1996). Towards child-friendly cities. New York: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (2007). Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries, Innocenti Report Card 7. Florence: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF (2010). The children left behind. A league table of inequality of child well-being in the world’s rich countries. Innocenti Report Card 9. Florence: Innocenti Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (2012). The state of the world’s children 2012. New York: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1989). UN convention on the rights of the child. New York: UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, G., & McKendrick, J. H. (1997). Children’s outdoor play: Exploring contemporary public concerns. Geoforum, 28(2), 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C. (1978/1990). The child in the city. London: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John H. McKendrick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

McKendrick, J.H. (2014). Geographies of Children’s Well-Being: in, of, and for Place. In: Ben-Arieh, A., Casas, F., Frønes, I., Korbin, J. (eds) Handbook of Child Well-Being. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9063-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9062-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9063-8

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and Law

Publish with us

Policies and ethics