Abstract
The most questionable aspect of commercialized research is its biased research agenda, while its epistemic characteristics mostly agree with epistemic research. This claims runs counter to a widespread sentiment that economically driven or “instrumental” research suffers from a decline in credibility and depth. Epistemic and application-driven research can be distinguished by their institutional research goals, which provide different stop-rules for projects and modes of topic selection. Application-oriented research is not beset with a general tendency toward superficiality, nor does it generally lack creativity and innovativeness. Only under specific circumstances is the quality of knowledge degraded by its production in the context of application. Yet the external determination of the research agenda which characterizes application-oriented research may produce biases that need to be compensated for moral reasons by science in the public interest.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It is under debate whether Merton’s “ethos of science” was meant in a descriptive or a normative sense. However, Merton was well aware that two of his four values were violated by the science of his period. “Universalism” (the irrelevance of personal traits of scientists for the evaluation of their findings) was not respected by Nazi science (which was among the motives for working out or reaffirming the ethos) and communalism was infringed by the capitalist economy (Merton, 1942, 270–271, 275). It follows that a purely descriptive reading is ruled out.
- 2.
In fact, phase-III clinical trials do not even constitute research in the proper sense since no discoveries are aimed at. Rather, the expectation is that earlier research outcome is confirmed and that a cumbersome legal procedure is completed smoothly. Clinical trials are obstacles to be overcome by pharmaceutical companies in order to get market access. The exceptional factor is that no genuine epistemic interests exist among those who pay for the study. The sponsors don’t want to know, rather they believe they know and want to pass an inconvenient and economically risky examination quickly and without much ado (Carrier, 2009).
References
Bacon, F. 1620 [1979]. The New Organon and Related Writings, ed. F.H. Anderson. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
Bains, W. 1997. Should we hire an epistemologist? Nature Biotechnology 15:396.
Barry, C.E., III, and M.S. Cheung. 2009. New tactics against tuberculosis. Scientific American 300(3):56–63.
Biddle, J. 2007. Lessons from the Vioxx Debacle: What the privatization of science can teach us about social epistemology. Social Epistemology 21:21–39.
Blume, S.S. 2005. Lock in, the state and vaccine development: Lessons from the history of polio vaccines. Research Policy 34:159–173.
Brown, J.R. 2001. Who Rules in Science? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bush, V. 1945. Science the Endless Frontier. A Report to the President. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, http://www.nsf.gov/od/lpa/nsf50/vbush1945.htm, last accessed Sept. 12, 2008.
Carrier, M. 2004. Knowledge gain and practical use: Models in pure and applied research. In Laws and Models in Science, ed. D. Gillies, 1–17. London: King’s College Publications.
Carrier, M. 2008. The aim and structure of methodological theory. In Rethinking Scientific Change and Theory Comparison: Stabilities, Ruptures, Incommensurabilities? eds. L. Soler, H. Sankey, and P. Hoyningen-Huene, 273–290. Dordrecht: Springer.
Carrier, M. 2009. Research under pressure: Methodological features of commercialized science. In The Commodification of Academic Research, ed. H. Radder. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Cartwright, N. 2006. Well-ordered science: Evidence for use. Philosophy of Science 73:S981–S991.
Commission of the European Communities. 2000. Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle. http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/health_consumer/library/pub/pub07_en.pdf, last accessed Sept. 12, 2008.
Gibbons, M., et al. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Sciences. London: Sage.
Godin, B. 2006. The linear model of innovation: The historical construction of an analytical framework. Science, Technology and Human Values 31:639–667.
Groß, M. 2005. Die Olefin-Metathese. Spektrum der Wissenschaft 12/2005:23–25.
Hohlfeld, R. 1979. Strategien gegen Krebs – Die Planung der Krebsforschung. In Geplante Forschung. Vergleichende Studien über den Einfluß politischer Programme auf die Wissenschaftsentwicklung, eds. W. van den Daele, W. Krohn, and P. Weingart, 181–238. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Kitcher, P. 1981. Explanatory unification. Philosophy of Science 48:507–531.
Kitcher, P. 2001. Science, Truth, Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Krimsky, S. 2003. Science in the Public Interest. Has the Lure of Profits Corrupted Biomedical Research? Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Kuhn, T.S. 1962 [1996]. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. 3rd ed.
Kuhn, T.S. 1977. Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In The Essential Tension. Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change, 320–339. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Küppers, G., and J. Lenhard. 2007. Computersimulationen. Wissen über eine imitierte Wirklichkeit. In Nachrichten aus der Wissensgesellschaft. Analysen zur Veränderung der Wissenschaft, eds. P. Weingart, et al., 111–138. Weilerswist: Velbrück.
Lakatos, I. 1970 [1978]. Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes (Philosophical Papers I), eds. J. Worrall, and G. Currie, 8–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Merton, R.K. 1942 [1973]. The normative structure of science. In The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, 267–278. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Nijhout, F.H. 2003. The importance of context in genetics. American Scientist 91:416–423.
Nordmann, A. 2004. Molecular disjunctions: Staking claims at the nanoscale. In Discovering the Nanoscale, eds. D. Baird , et al., 51–62. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Polanyi, M. 1962. Personal Knowledge. Towards a Post-critical Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Rosenberg, N. 1990. Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)? Research Policy 19:165–174.
Salmon, W.C. 1984. Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schirmer, H. 2004. Medikamente für die Armen. Spektrum der Wissenschaft 12/2004:110–113.
Schweber, S.S. 1993. Physics, community and the crisis in physical theory. Physics Today November 1993:34–40.
Stokes, D.E. 1997. Pasteur’s Quadrant. Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Wilholt, T. 2006. Design rules: Industrial research and epistemic merit. Philosophy of Science 73:66–89.
Wilholt, T. 2009. Bias and values in scientific research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40:92–101.
Ziman, J. 2002. The continuing need for disinterested research. Science and Engineering Ethics 8:397–399.
Acknowledgements
My heartfelt thanks go to Torsten Wilholt and Cornelis Menke for their perceptive remarks which did a lot to improve the text.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carrier, M. (2011). Knowledge, Politics, and Commerce: Science Under the Pressure of Practice. In: Carrier, M., Nordmann, A. (eds) Science in the Context of Application. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 274. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9051-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9051-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9050-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9051-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)