Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated religion to be an important factor that differentiates women’s fertility. This chapter extends the examination to men’s fertility outcome and their religion. Besides examining religious affiliation and fertility, I also take religiosity into consideration, which is measured by the manner in which people practice their religion. I begin the chapter by reviewing four principle hypotheses proposed in the literature that explain fertility differentials among people with different religious affiliations. The chapter then sets forth a series of hypotheses on religious affiliation, religiosity and male and female fertility. These hypotheses are tested by analyzing male and female samples taken from the NSFG Cycle 6 data set. The results show that the fertility gap among religious groups is shrinking for both men and women, meaning religious denomination may not be an important indicator that differentiates fertility in future. However, religiosity turns to be a factor that demonstrates substantial importance when shaping religious people’s fertility outcomes. Through contrasting the effects of religion and religiosity on male and female fertility, the results of this research show that religion and religiosity do not seem to be factors that differentiate women’s than on men’s fertility.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adsera, A. (2007). Marital fertility and religion in Spain, 1985 and 1999. Population Studies, 60(2), 205–221.
Ballard, B. N. (2004). Patterns of intended and actual fertility among sub-groups of foreign-born and native-born Latinas. College Station, TX: Texas A&M University.
Barro, R. J., & McCleary, R. M. (2003). Religion and economic growth across countries. American Sociological Review, 68, 760–781.
Bearman, P. S., & Bruckner, H. (2001). Promising the future: virginity pledges and first intercourse. American Journal of Sociology, 106(4), 859–912.
Berrington, A. (2001). Transition to adulthood in Britain. In M. Corijn & E. Klijzing (Eds.), Transition in adulthood in Europe (pp. 67–102). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Bongaarts, J. (1982). The fertility-inhibiting effects of the intermediate fertility variables. Studies in Family Planning, 13(6), 179–189.
Bongaarts, J., & Watkins, S. S. (1996). Social interaction and contemporary fertility transition. Population and Development Review, 22(4), 639–682.
Bouvier, L. F., & Rao, S. L. N. (1975). Socioreligious factors in fertility decline. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Chamie, J. (1981). Religion and fertility: Arab Christian-Muslim differentials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coale, A. J., & Trussell, J. (1974). Model fertility schedules: Variations in the age structure of childbearing in human populations. Population Studies, 44(2), 203–213.
Coale, A. J., & Watkins, S. S. (1986). The decline of fertility in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Corijn, M. (2001). Transition to adulthood in Flanders (Belgium). In M. Corijn & E. Klijzing (Eds.), Transition in adulthood in Europe (pp. 103–130). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Corijn, M., & Klijzing, E. (2001). Transitions to adulthood in Europe. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
De Jong, G. F. (1965). Religious fundamentalism, socioeconomic status and fertility attitudes in the Southern Appalachians. Demography, 2, 540–548.
Ellison, C., Echevarria, S., & Smith, B. (2005). Religion and abortion attitudes among U.S. Hispanics: Findings from the 1990 Latino national political survey. Social Science Quarterly, 86(1), 192–208.
Freedman, R., Whelpton, P. K., & Smith, J. W. (1961). Socio-economic factors in religious differentials in Fertility. American Sociological Review, 26(4), 608–614.
Goldscheider, C. (1971). Population, modernization and social structure. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co.
Goldscheider, F. K., & Goldscheider, C. (1993). Leaving home before marriage: Ethnicity, familism and generational relationships. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Goldscheider, C., & Uhlenberg, P. R. (1969). Minority group status and fertility. American Journal of Sociology, 74(4), 361–372.
Hervitz, H. M. (1985). Selectivity, adaptation, or disruption? A comparison of alternative hypotheses on the effects of migration on fertility: The case of Brazil. International Migration Review, 19(2), 293–317.
Jaffe, A. J., & Cullen, R. M. (1975). Fertility of the Puerto Rican origin population-Mainland United States and Puerto Rico: 1970. International Migration Review, 9(2), 193–209.
Janssen, S. G., & Hauser, R. M. (1981). Religion, socialization, and fertility. Demography, 18(4), 511–528.
Johnson-Hanks, J. (2006). On the politics and practice of Muslim fertility – Comparative evidence from West Africa. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 20(1), 12–30.
Jurecki-Tiller, M. (2004). The Influence of Religion on Childbearing: Fertility, Reproductive Biology and Belief in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. Unpublished Dissertation, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo.
Knodel, J., Gray, R. S., Sriwatchrin, P., & Peracca, S. (1999). Religion and reproduction: Muslims in Buddhist Thailand. Population Studies, 53(2), 149–164.
Lehrer, E. L. (1996). The role of the husband’s religious affiliation in the economic and demographic behavior of families. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 35(2), 145–155.
Lehrer, E. L. (2004). Religion as a determinant of economic and demographic behavior in the United States. Population and Development Review, 30(4), 707–726.
Marchena, E., & Waite, L. J. (2001). Marriage and Childbearing Attitudes in Late Adolescence: Gender, Race and Ethnic Differences. Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America
Marcum, J. P. (1981). Explaining fertility differentials among U.S. Protestants, Social Forces, 60(2), 532–543.
Marcum, J. P. (1988). Religious affiliation, participation and fertility: A cautionary note. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 27(4), 621–629.
McQuillan, K. (2004). When does religion influence fertility? Population and Development Review, 30(1), 25–56.
Montgomery, M. R., & Casterline, J. B. (1996). Social learning, social influence, and new models of fertility. Population and Development Review, 22, 151–175.
Mosher, W. D., & Hendershot, G. E. (1984). Religious affiliation and the fertility of married couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 46(3), 671–677.
Mosher, W. D., Johnson, D. P., & Horn, M. C. (1986). Religion and fertility in the United States: The importance of marriage patterns and Hispanic origin. Demography, 23(3), 367–379.
Mosher, W. D., Williams, L. B., & Johnson, D. P. (1992). Religion and fertility in the United States: New patterns. Demography, 29(3), 199–214.
Myers, S. M. (1996). An interactive model of religiosity inheritance: The importance of family context. American Sociological Review, 61, 858–866.
National Center for Health Statistics. (2005). Fertility, Family Planning and Reproductive Health of US Women: Data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Hyattsville, Maryland, MD.
Ongaro, F. (2001). Transition to adulthood in Italy. In M. Corijn & E. Klijzing (Eds.), Transition in adulthood in Europe (pp. 173–207). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Paternoster, B., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866.
Poston, D. L. J. (1990). Voluntary and involuntary childlessness among Catholic and Non-Catholic women: Are the patterns converging? Social Biology, 37(3&4), 251–265.
Poston, D. L. J., Chang, C. -F., & Dan, H. (2006). Fertility differences between the majority and minority nationality groups in China Population Research and Policy Review, 26, 67–101.
Preiffer, C., & Nowak, V. (2001). Transition to adulthood in Austria. In M. Corijn & E. Klijzing (Eds.), Transition in adulthood in Europe (pp. 43–66). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
Ryder, N. (1974). Comment. In T. W. Schultz (Ed.), Economics of the family (pp. 76–80). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Saenz, R., & Morales, M. C. (2005). Demography of race and ethnicity. In J. Poston, L. Dudley, & M. Micklin (Eds.), Handbook of population. New York, NY: Academics/Kluwers.
Sander, W. (1992). Catholicism and the economics of fertility. Population Studies, 46(3), 477–489.
Sander, W. (1993). Catholicism and marriage in the United States. Demography, 30(3), 373–384.
Singley, S. G., & Landale, N. S. (1998). Incorporating origin and process in migration fertility frameworks: The case of Puerto Rican women. Social Forces, 76(4), 1437–1464.
Watkins, S. C. (1992). From provinces into nations: Demographic integration in Western Europe, 1870–1960. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Westoff, C. F., & Frejka, T. (2007). Fertility and religiousness among European Muslims. Population and Development Review, 33, 785–809.
Westoff, C. F., & Jone, E. F. (1979). The end of “Catholic” fertility. Demography, 16(2), 209–217.
Xie, Y., & Pimentel, E. E. (1992). Age patterns of marital fertility: Revising the Coale-Trussell method. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(420), 977–984.
Yeatman, S. E., & Trinitapoli, J. (2007). Beyond Denomination: New Tests of Whether and How Religion Matters for Family Planning. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of Population Association of America New York City.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhang, L. (2011). Religion, Religiosity and Male and Female Fertility. In: Male Fertility Patterns and Determinants. The Springer Series on Demographic Methods and Population Analysis, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8939-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8939-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-8938-0
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-8939-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)