Skip to main content

Conditioned Latin Hypercube Sampling: Optimal Sample Size for Digital Soil Mapping of Arid Rangelands in Utah, USA

  • Chapter
Digital Soil Mapping

Part of the book series: Progress in Soil Science ((PROSOIL,volume 2))

Abstract

Conditioned Latin Hypercube Sampling (cLHS) is a type of stratified random sampling that accurately represents the variability of environmental covariates in feature space. As the smallest possible sample is important for efficient field work, what is the optimal sample size for digital soil mapping? An optimal sample size accurately represents the variability in the environmental covariates and provides enough samples for predictive models. This paper briefly reviews cLHS and investigates different sample sizes for representing five environmental covariates in a 30,000-ha complex landscape in the Great Basin of southwestern Utah. The cLHS code was run in Matlab™ (Mathworks, 2008) and statistical analysis was performed using the R statistical language (R Development Core Team, 2009). Graphical analysis for continuous data and chi-square analysis of categorical data suggested optimal sample size for this study area is approximately 200 to 300 (0.05–0.1%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Best, M.G., Lemmon, D.M., and Morris, H.T., 1989. Geologic Map of the Milford Quadrangle and East Half of the Frisco Quadrangle, Beaver County, Utah. USGS, Reston, VA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bui, E.N., Simon, D., Schoknecht, N., and Payne, A., 2007. Adequate prior sampling is everything: lessons from the Ord River Basin, Australia, pp. 193–204. In: Lagacherie, P., McBratney, A.B., and Voltz, M. (eds.), Digital Soil Mapping: An Introductory Perspective. Developments in Soil Science, Vol. 31. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, P.S. Jr., 1996. Image-based atmospheric corrections – revisited and revised. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 62(9):1025–1036.

    Google Scholar 

  • ERDAS, 2006. ERDAS Imagine V9.1. ERDAS, Atlanta, GA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, D., Kim, Y., Haydu-Houdeshell, C., Clemmer, P., Almaraz, R., and Ballmer, R., 2007. Fitting soil property spatial distribution models in the Mojave Desert for digital soil mapping, pp. 465–475. In: Lagacherie, P., McBratney, A.B., Voltz, M. (eds.), Digital Soil Mapping: An Introductory Perspective. Developments in Soil Science, Vol. 31. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Huete, A.R., 1988. A soil adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sensing of the Environment 25:295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IRDIAC (Intermountain Region Digital Image Archive Center), 2008. IRDIAC image search. Retrieved September, 18, 2008 from http://earth.gis.usu.edu.

  • Mathworks, 2008. Matlab release 2008a. The Mathworks Inc., Natick, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBratney, A.B., Santos, M.L.M., and Minasny, B., 2003. On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117(1–2):3–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, N.J., and Ryan, P.J., 1999. Spatial prediction of soil properties using environmental correlation. Geoderma 89(1–2):67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minasny, B., 2007. Software (cLHS code). Retrieved August, 2008 from http://www.usyd.edu.au/agric/acpa/people/budi/software.htm

  • Minasny, B., and McBratney, A.B., 2006. A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information. Computers & Geosciences 32(9):1378–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minasny, B., and McBratney, A.B., 2007. Latin hypercube sampling as a tool for digital soil mapping, pp. 153–165. In: Lagacherie, P., McBratney, A.B., and Voltz, M. (eds.), Digital Soil Mapping: An Introductory Perspective. Developments in Soil Science, Vol. 31. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, N.J.N., and Ryan, P.J., 1999. Spatial prediction of soil properties using environmental correlation. Geoderma, 89(1–2): 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NED, 2006. USGS National Elevation Dataset. Retrieved March 21, 2009 from http://ned.usgs.gov

  • NRCS, 2008. National Resource Conservation Service MLRA Explorer. Retrieved September 18, 2008 from http://www.cei.psu.edu/mlra

  • R Development Core Team, 2009. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org (Last accessed 22 April 2010).

  • Soil Survey Division Staff, 1993. Soil Survey Manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stum, A.K., 2007. Aspect correction tool. Unpublished model. Soil Genesis Lab. Utah State University. Model available upon request.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarboton, D., 2008. Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models (TauDEM). Retrieved June, 8, 2009 from http://hydrology.neng.usu.edu/taudem.

  • USGS National Gap Analysis Program, 2004. Provisional Digital Land Cover Map for the Southwestern United States. Version 1.0. RS/GIS Laboratory, College of Natural Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. W. Brungard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brungard, C.W., Boettinger, J.L. (2010). Conditioned Latin Hypercube Sampling: Optimal Sample Size for Digital Soil Mapping of Arid Rangelands in Utah, USA. In: Boettinger, J.L., Howell, D.W., Moore, A.C., Hartemink, A.E., Kienast-Brown, S. (eds) Digital Soil Mapping. Progress in Soil Science, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8863-5_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics