Abstract
Science achievement in urban schools is related to social class (Morais et al. 1992), especially in high-poverty regions in which ethnic minorities attend neighborhood schools (e.g., Tobin et al. 2005). Unfortunately, solutions to the problems have been characterized in terms of reducing achievement gaps and framing the problems and potential solutions in terms of deficit perspectives that embrace meritocracy, especially holding individuals accountable for their own achievement and, in the case of teachers, for their students’ achievement. Usually ignored are the cultural resources, which are the very building blocks on which science achievement can grow. In our ongoing research, we have searched for the capital used by youth belonging to social categories that appear to be disadvantaged in many fields of their lifeworlds. However, they succeed in many ways and we take care not to overlook the resources they deploy in attaining their goals. Accordingly, our project has sought to identify the culture that is a foundation for success in out-of-school fields and explore ways in which similar culture might support learning in schools (Tobin 2007a). Our research shows how social class, often associated with poverty, affords the production of culture (i.e., science learning).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Regents examinations are state-level tests administered in high school courses such as physics, chemistry and living environment. In order to graduate from high school students must pass at least one Regents examination in a science course. Furthermore, the quality of schools and teaching is judged on the basis of students’ performance on Regents examinations. Accordingly, the Regents examinations are regarded as high stakes tests, for schools, teachers and students.
References
Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: W.W. Norton.
Bourdieu, P. (1992). The practice of reflexive sociology (The Paris workshop). In P. Bourdieu & L. J. D. Wacquant (Eds.), An invitation to reflexive sociology (pp. 216–260). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Emdin, C. (2007). Exploring the contexts of urban science classrooms: Cogenerative dialogues, coteaching, and cosmopolitanism (Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York, 2007). Dissertations Abstracts International, AAT 3283206.
Juffé, M. (2003). Lévinas, passivity and the three dimensions of psychotherapy. Paper presented at Psychology for the Other: Seminar on Emmanuel Lévinas, Seattle University, Seattle, WA. Retrieved August 28, 2007 from http://www.seattleu.edu/artsci/psychology/conference/2003/archive2003.html
Morais, A., Fontinhas, F., & Neves, I. (1992). Recognition and realization rules in acquiring school science - the contribution of pedagogy and social background of students. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 13, 247–270.
Roth, W.-M. (2007). Theorizing passivity. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 1–8.
Roth, W.-M. & Lee, Y. J. (2007). “Vygotsky’s neglected legacy”: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77, 186–232.
Schutz, A. (1962). Common sense and scientific interpretation of human action. In M. Natanson (Ed.), Collected papers I – The problem of social reality (pp. 3–96). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Sewell, W. H., Jr. (1999). The concept(s) of culture. In V. E. Bonell & L. Hunt (Eds.), Beyond the cultural turn (pp. 35–61). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Shady, A. (2008). Immigration and cultural as factors mediating the teaching and learning of urban science (Doctoral dissertation, City University of New York, 2007). Dissertations Abstracts International, AAT 3325395.
Tobin, K. (2006). Qualitative research in classrooms: Pushing the boundaries of theory and methodology. In K. Tobin & J. Kincheloe (Eds.), Doing educational research: A handbook (pp. 15–58). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Tobin, K. (2007a). Issues of class in urban science education. In J. L. Kincheloe (Ed.), Cutting class (pp. 171–198). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Tobin, K. (2007b). Collaborating with students to produce success in science. The Journal of Science and Mathematics in South East Asia, 30(2), 1–44.
Tobin, K. (2011). Global reproduction and transformation of science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 127–142. DOI: 10.1007/s11422-010-9293-3.
Tobin, K., Elmesky, R., & Seiler, G. (eds). (2005). Improving urban science education: New roles for teachers, students and researchers. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Tobin, K. & Roth, W.-M. (2006). Teaching to learn: A view from the field. Rotterdam: Sense Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tobin, K., Llena, R. (2010). Producing and Maintaining Culturally Adaptive Teaching and Learning of Science in Urban Schools. In: Murphy, C., Scantlebury, K. (eds) Coteaching in International Contexts. Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3707-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3707-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3706-0
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3707-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)