Skip to main content

Beyond the Error Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A World Without Values

Part of the book series: Philosophical Studies Series ((PSSP,volume 114))

Abstract

Mackie's argument for the error theory is described. Four ways of responding to Mackie's argument – the Instrumental Approach, the Universalization Approach, the Reasons Approach, and the Constitutivist Approach – are outlined and evaluated. It emerges that though the Constitutivist Approach offers the most promising response to Mackie's argument, it is difficult to say whether that response is adequate or not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blackburn, S. 1993. Errors and the phenomenology of value. In his Essays in quasi-realism, 149–165. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, N. 1979. Wide reflective equilibrium and theory acceptance in ethics. Journal of Philosophy 76: 256–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. 1963. Actions, reasons, and causes. Journal of Philosophy 60: 685–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R. 1994. Beyond morality. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, D. 1986. Morals by agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R. M. 1981. Moral thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. 1985. Is There a single true morality? In Morality, reason, and truth, eds. D. Copp and D. Zimmerman, 77–99. Totowa: Rowman and Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joyce, R. 2001. The myth of morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. 1786. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals, Trans. H. J. Paton. 1948. London: Hutchinson and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C. 1986. Skepticism about practical reason. Journal of Philosophy 83: 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. 1984. Putnam's paradox. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62: 221–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. 1989. Dispositional theories of value. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 63(suppl.): 113–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie, J. L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J. 1985. Values and secondary qualities. In Morality and objectivity, ed. T. Honderich, 110–129. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. E. 1903. Principia ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. Forthcoming. On what matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1951. Outline of a decision procedure for ethics. Philosophical Review 60: 177–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What we owe to each other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer-Landau, R. 2003. Moral realism: A defence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. 1994. The moral problem. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. 2001. The incoherence argument: Reply to Shafer-Landau. Analysis 61: 254–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. 2004. Instrumental desires, instrumental rationality. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 78(suppl.): 93–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. 2006. Is that all there is? The Journal of Ethics 10: 75–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. 1981. Internal and external reasons. In his Moral luck, 101–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

An earlier draft of this chapter was given at the Symposium on Moral Rationalism at the annual Australasian Association of Philosophy Conference held in Melbourne in 2008. I am grateful for helpful comments made by my co-symposiasts – Charles Pigden and Francois and Laura Schroeter – and by members of the audience, especially Daniel Cohen, Simon Keller, Norva Lo, and Geoffrey Sayre-McCord. I am also especially grateful for written comments I received from Richard Joyce and Simon Kirchin. Though they saved me from many errors, I fear that all too many remain. Finally, I would like to thank the anonymous referee who suggested that I fix my tortured prose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, M. (2010). Beyond the Error Theory. In: Joyce, R., Kirchin, S. (eds) A World Without Values. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 114. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3339-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics