Abstract
Mackie's argument for the error theory is described. Four ways of responding to Mackie's argument – the Instrumental Approach, the Universalization Approach, the Reasons Approach, and the Constitutivist Approach – are outlined and evaluated. It emerges that though the Constitutivist Approach offers the most promising response to Mackie's argument, it is difficult to say whether that response is adequate or not.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blackburn, S. 1993. Errors and the phenomenology of value. In his Essays in quasi-realism, 149–165. New York: Oxford University Press.
Daniels, N. 1979. Wide reflective equilibrium and theory acceptance in ethics. Journal of Philosophy 76: 256–282.
Davidson, D. 1963. Actions, reasons, and causes. Journal of Philosophy 60: 685–700.
Garner, R. 1994. Beyond morality. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Gauthier, D. 1986. Morals by agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Hare, R. M. 1981. Moral thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harman, G. 1985. Is There a single true morality? In Morality, reason, and truth, eds. D. Copp and D. Zimmerman, 77–99. Totowa: Rowman and Allanheld.
Joyce, R. 2001. The myth of morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. 1786. Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals, Trans. H. J. Paton. 1948. London: Hutchinson and Company.
Korsgaard, C. 1986. Skepticism about practical reason. Journal of Philosophy 83: 5–25.
Lewis, D. 1984. Putnam's paradox. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62: 221–223.
Lewis, D. 1989. Dispositional theories of value. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 63(suppl.): 113–137.
Mackie, J. L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. London: Penguin.
McDowell, J. 1985. Values and secondary qualities. In Morality and objectivity, ed. T. Honderich, 110–129. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Moore, G. E. 1903. Principia ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Parfit, D. Forthcoming. On what matters.
Rawls, J. 1951. Outline of a decision procedure for ethics. Philosophical Review 60: 177–197.
Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What we owe to each other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Shafer-Landau, R. 2003. Moral realism: A defence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, M. 1994. The moral problem. Oxford: Blackwell.
Smith, M. 2001. The incoherence argument: Reply to Shafer-Landau. Analysis 61: 254–266.
Smith, M. 2004. Instrumental desires, instrumental rationality. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 78(suppl.): 93–109.
Smith, M. 2006. Is that all there is? The Journal of Ethics 10: 75–106.
Williams, B. 1981. Internal and external reasons. In his Moral luck, 101–113. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Acknowledgments
An earlier draft of this chapter was given at the Symposium on Moral Rationalism at the annual Australasian Association of Philosophy Conference held in Melbourne in 2008. I am grateful for helpful comments made by my co-symposiasts – Charles Pigden and Francois and Laura Schroeter – and by members of the audience, especially Daniel Cohen, Simon Keller, Norva Lo, and Geoffrey Sayre-McCord. I am also especially grateful for written comments I received from Richard Joyce and Simon Kirchin. Though they saved me from many errors, I fear that all too many remain. Finally, I would like to thank the anonymous referee who suggested that I fix my tortured prose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, M. (2010). Beyond the Error Theory. In: Joyce, R., Kirchin, S. (eds) A World Without Values. Philosophical Studies Series, vol 114. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3339-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3339-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-3338-3
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-3339-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)