Abstract
“Formative assessment” has been the subject of conceptual pluralism for many years. In the beginning there was “assessment”, which was originally a benign and non-judgmental activity, but this has been captured over time by inferences of judgment, measurement and finality. During recent decades, when the question of purpose was posed, we have struggled to qualify the original word in ways that might indicate different purposes. The element of final judgment was denoted by the adjective “summative”. The idea of assessment informing the future rather than merely summarising the past produced another adjective “formative” but in the minds and practices of many educators the distinction has remained unclear.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the United Kingdom, the impact of their findings on policy is interestingly different within different parts of the UK. Wales and Scotland have each put a greater emphasis on formative assessment and downplayed the focus on testing, In England, on the other hand, at the time of writing, the testing regime remains in place, despite serious concerns about its cost-effectiveness. Recently the English government has announced the abolishing of one of its prominent exams, SATs, taken by children of the age of 14 and has replaced it with school report cards. This move, some argue, signals the beginning of the emphasis reverting to teacher assessment.
References
Absolum, M. (2006). Clarity in the classroom. Auckland: Hodder Education.
Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. Cambridge: University of Cambridge School of Education.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Classroom assessment. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–75.
Egan, G. (1994). Working the shadow side: A guide to positive behind-the-scenes management. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Hargreaves, A. (1998). The emotions of teaching and educational change. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), International handbook of educational change (pp. 558–572). Dordrecht: Springer.
Proshaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of change: Applications to addictive behaviour. American Psychologist, 47(9), 1102–1114.
Wiliam, D. et al. (2005). Classroom assessment, minute by minute, day by day. Educational Leadership. ASCD: Virginia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sutton, R. (2010). Making Formative Assessment the Way the School Does Business: The Impact and Implications of Formative Assessment for Teachers, Students and School Leaders. In: Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M., Hopkins, D. (eds) Second International Handbook of Educational Change. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2660-6_49
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2660-6_49
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2659-0
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2660-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)