This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Schutte and Trujillo [11] define a four-level workload management hierarchy: Aviate, Navigate, Communicate, and Systems management. Separate is added here to accommodate new flight-deck responsibilities anticipated in the NextGen environment.
References
Joint Planning and Development Office (2009) Concept of Operations for the Next Generation Air Transport System, v3.0, October 2009 http://www.jpdo.gov/library/NextGen_ConOps_v3%200.pdf
Salmon PM, Stanton NA, Walker GH, Jenkins DP (2009) Distributed situation awareness. Ashgate, Burlington
Endsley MR (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 37(1):32–64
Jones RET, Connors ES, Mossey ME, Hyatt JR, Hansen NJ, Endsley MR (2010) Modeling situation awareness for army infantry platoon leaders using fuzzy cognitive mapping techniques. In: Proceedings of the Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation (BRIMS) Conference, Charleston, SC
Wickens CD, McCarley J, Alexander A, Thomas LC, Ambinder M, Zheng S (2008) Chapter 9. Attention-situation awareness (A-SA) model of pilot error. In: Foyle DC, Hooey BL (eds) Human performance modeling in aviation. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton
Zacharias GL, Miao AX, Illgen C, Yara JM, Siouris GM (1995) SAMPLE: situation awareness model for pilot in-the-loop evaluation. First Annual Conference on Situation Awareness in the Tactical Air Environment, Naval Air Warfare Center, Patuxent River, MD
Gore BF (2011, this volume) Man-machine integration design and analysis system (MIDAS) v5: augmentations, motivations, and directions for aeronautics applications. In: Cacciabue C et al. (eds) Human modelling in assisted transportation. Springer-Verlag Italia Srl
Gore BF, Smith JD (2006) Risk assessment and human performance modeling: the need for an integrated approach. Int J Hum Factors Model Simul 1(1):119–139
Gore BF, Hooey BL, Wickens CD, Scott-Nash S (2009) A computational implementation of a human attention guiding mechanism in MIDAS v5. In: Duffy VG (ed) Digital human modeling. HCII. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp 237–246
Shively RJ, Brickner M, Silbiger J (1997) A computational model of situational awareness instantiated in MIDAS. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Columbus, OH
Schutte PC, Trujillo AC (1996) Flight crew task management in non-normal situations. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, HFES, Santa Monica, CA, pp 244–248
Fadden S, Ververs PM, Wickens CD (2001) Pathway HUDs: are they viable? Hum Factors 43:173–193
Granada S, Dao AQ, Wong W, Johnson WW, Battiste V (2005) Development and integration of a human-centered volumetric cockpit display for distributed air-ground operations. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, Oklahoma City, OK
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Aviation Safety (AvSAFE) Program (Integrated Intelligent Flight Deck Technologies (IIFTD)/System Design & Analysis (SDA) project).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Italia Srl
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hooey, B.L. et al. (2011). Modeling Pilot Situation Awareness. In: Cacciabue, P., Hjälmdahl, M., Luedtke, A., Riccioli, C. (eds) Human Modelling in Assisted Transportation. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1821-1_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1821-1_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1820-4
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1821-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)