Skip to main content

Part of the book series: New Economic Windows ((NEW))

Abstract

A tick size is the smallest increment of a security price. Tick size is typically regulated by the exchange where the security is traded and it may be modified either because the exchange enforces an overall tick size change or because the price of the security is too low or too high. There is an extensive literature, partially reviewed in Sect. 2 of the present paper, on the role of tick size in the price formation process. However, the role and the importance of tick size has not been yet fully understood, as testified, for example, by a recent document of the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. http://www.cesr-eu.org/index.php?page=consultation details&id=158

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bouchaud JP, Farmer JD, Lillo F (2009) How markets slowly digest changes in supply and demand. In Hens T, Schenk-Hoppé KR (eds) Handbook of Financial Markets: Dynamics and Evolution, North-Holland

    Google Scholar 

  3. Farmer JD, Gillemot L, Lillo F, Mike S, Sen A (2004) What really causes large price changes? Quantitative Finance 4: 383–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ponzi A, Lillo F, Mantegna RN (2009) Market reaction to a bid-ask spread change: A power-law relaxation dynamics. Physical Review E 80:016112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crack TF (1994), Tinkering with ticks: choosing minimum price variation for U.S. equity markets. Working Paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, unpublished

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ahn H, Cao CQ, Choe H (1996) Tick size, spread and volume. Journal of Financial Intermediation 5:2–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Niemeyer J, and Sandås P (1994) Tick size, market liquidity and trading volume: evidence from the Stockholm Stock Exchange. Working Paper, Stockholm School of Economics, unpublished

    Google Scholar 

  8. Angel JJ (1997) Tick size, share price, and stock splits. Journal of Finance 52:655–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bacidore J (1997) The impact of decimialization on market quality: an empirical investigation of the Toronto Stock Exchange. Journal of Financial Intermediation 6:92–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Porter D and Weaver D (1997) Decimalization and market quality. Financial Management 26:5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huson M, Kim Y, Mehrotra V (1997) Decimal quotes, market quality, and competition for order flow: evidence from the Toronto Stock Exchange. Working Paper, University of Alberta, unpublished

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ahn H, Cao CQ, Choe H (1998) Decimalization and competition among stock markets: evidence from the Toronto Stock Exchange cross-listed securities. Journal of Financial Markets 1:51–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bessembinder H (1997) Endogenous changes in the minimum tick: an analysis of Nasdaq securities trading near ten dollars. Working Paper, Arizona State University, unpublished

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ronen T, and Weaver DG (1998) Teenies’ anyone: the case of the American Stock Exchange. Working Paper, Rutgers University, unpublished

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bollen NPB, Whaley RE (1998) Are “teenies” better? Journal of Portfolio Management 25:10–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ricker JP (1998) Breaking the eighth: sixteenths on the New York Stock Exchange. Working Paper, unpublished

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jones CM, Lipson ML (2001) Sixteenths: Direct Evidence on Institutional Trading Costs. Journal of Financial Economics 59:253–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goldstein MA, Kavajecz KA (2000) Eighths, sixteenths, and market depth: changes in tick size and liquidity provision on the NYSE. Journal of Financial Economics 56:125–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang RD, Stoll HR (2001) Tick Size, Bid-Ask Spreads, and Market Structure. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 36:503–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bacidore J, Battalio R, Jennings R (2001) Changes in Order Characteristics, Displayed Liquidity, and Execution Quality on the New York Stock Exchange around the Switch to Decimal Pricing. New York Stock Exchange Working Paper

    Google Scholar 

  21. Onnela JP, Töyli J, Kaski K (2009) Tick size and stock returns. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 388:441–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Münnix MC, Schfer R, Guhr T (2010) Impact of the tick-size on financial returns and correlations. preprint at arXiv:1001.5124v4

    Google Scholar 

  23. Epps TW (1979) Comovements in stock prices in the very short run. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74:291–298

    Google Scholar 

  24. Renó R (2003) A closer look at the Epps effect. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 6:87–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tóth B, Kertész J (2009) The epps effect revisited. Quantitative Finance 9:793–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ding Z, Granger CWJ, Engle RF (1993) A long-memory property of stock market returns and a new model. Journal of Empirical Finance 1:83–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gillemot L, Farmer JD, Lillo F (2006) There’s more to volatility than volume. Quantitative Finance 6:371–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Peng CK, Buldyrev SV, Havlin S, Simons M, Stanley HE, Goldberger AL (1994) Mosaic organization of DNA nucleotides. Physical Review E 49: 1685–1689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. La Spada G et al. (2010) Effect of coarse-graining on the diffusion properties of a long memory process. in preparation

    Google Scholar 

  30. Engle RF (1982) Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of Variance of United Kingdom Inflation. Econometrica 50:987–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mandelbrot BB, Taylor HM (1967) On distribution of stock price differences. Operations Research 15:1057–1062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Clark PK (1973) Subordinated stochastic process model with finite variance for speculative prices. Econometrica 41:135–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ane T, Geman H (2000) Order flow, transaction clock, and normality of asset returns. The Journal of Finance 55 2259–2284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Plerou V, Gopikrishnan P, Stanley HE (2005) Quantifying fluctuations in market liquidity: analysis of the bid-ask spread. Physical Review E 71:046131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lillo F, Farmer JD (2005) The key role of liquidity fluctuations in determining large price changes. Fluctuation and Noise Letters 5:L209–L216

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

La Spada, G., Doyne Farmer, J., Lillo, F. (2011). Tick Size and Price Diffusion. In: Abergel, F., Chakrabarti, B.K., Chakraborti, A., Mitra, M. (eds) Econophysics of Order-driven Markets. New Economic Windows. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1766-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics