Skip to main content

Opportunities and Challenges for Carbon Trading from Livestock Sector

  • Chapter
Climate Change Impact on Livestock: Adaptation and Mitigation

Abstract

Livestock are important source of GHG emissions accounting for about 28 % of the global anthropogenic methane emissions. The participation of this sector in the carbon markets is, however, in nascent stage, largely confined to animal waste management projects, although the emissions from enteric fermentation are several times more than that from manure. This chapter discusses the potential of generating carbon credits by improving the feed fermentation efficiency through nutritional interventions such as dietary manipulation and feed additives and increasing the productivity of animals through breeding and other long-term management strategies. There are several socioeconomic, institutional, and technical challenges for the stakeholders in successful formulation and implementation of such mitigation options from the perspective of carbon trading. As the global carbon trading system in one form or the other will be a fixture in the world economy for decades, it is imperative that the uptake of programmatic approaches to project development is increased and standardized approaches to baseline, additionality assessment, and activity-based monitoring methods underpinned by regionally specific field research are developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J (2012) World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision, ESA working paper No. 12–03. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Alford AR, Hegarty RS, Parnell PF, Cacho OJ, Herd RM, Griffith GR (2006) The impact of breeding to reduce residual feed intake on enteric methane emissions from the Australian beef industry. Aust J Exp Agric 46:813–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur PF, Herd RM, Basarab JA (2010) The role of cattle genetically efficient in feed utilisation in an Australian carbon trading environment. AFBM J 7(2):5–13. http://www.csu.edu.au/faculty/science/saws/afbmnetwork/

  • Attwood GT, Altermann E, Kelly WJ, Leahy SC, Zhang L, Morrison M (2011) Exploring rumen methanogen genomes to identify targets for methane mitigation strategies. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166–167:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchemin KA, Kreuzer M, O’Mara F, McAllister TA (2008) Nutritional management for enteric methane abatement: a review. Aust J Exp Agric 48:21–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomberg (2013) Carbon market worth plunged by over a third in 2012. http://www.euractiv.com/climate-environment/carbon-market-worth-plunged-thir-news-516881

  • Chadwick D, Sommer S, Thorman R, Fangueiro D, Cardenas L, Amon B, Misselbrook T (2011) Manure management: implications for greenhouse gas emissions. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166–67:514–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Climate Change Central (2010) Carbon Offset Solutions: Draft Alberta protocols. http://carbonoffsetsolutions.climatechangecentral.com/offset-protocols/draft-alberta-protocols. Verified on 2010-11-02

  • Cottle DJ, Conington J (2012) Breeding for reduced methane emissions in extensive UK sheep systems. J Agric Sci 150:570–583

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eckard RJ, Grainger C, de Klein CAM (2010) Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production: a review. Livest Sci 130:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forster R (2014) China seeks to breed more cattle on back of carbon trading income from improved grassland. Livestock and Meat Industry Notes. www.rforster.com/index.php/articles/china-east-asia/china

  • Gledhill R, Herweijer C, Hamza-Goodacre D, Grant J, Webb C, Steege J (2011) Agricultural carbon markets: opportunities and challenges for Sub-Saharan Africa. PWC and the Rockefeller Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty RS, Goopy JP, Herd RM, McCorkell B (2007) Cattle selected for lower residual feed intake have reduced daily methane production. J Anim Sci 85:1479–1486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, von Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx JC (eds) Climate change 2014, mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen J (2013) Money from something: carbon market developments for agriculture animal manure management. Extension America’s research based learning network, November 07, 2013. http://www.extension.org/pages/67612/money-from-something:-carbon-market-developments-for-agriculture

  • Kossoy A, Guigon P (2012) The state and trends of the carbon market 2012. Carbon Finance, The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe NZ (2014) Legislative changes to the New Zealand emissions trading scheme (NZ ETS). Ministry for the Environment, New Zealand. http://www.climatechange.govt.nz/emissions-trading-scheme/ets-amendments/index.html

  • NATCOM (2012) India’s second national communication to UNFCCC. Ministryof Environment and Forests, Govt. of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen SO, Sommer SG (2011) Ammonia and nitrous oxide interactions: roles of manure organic matter management. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166–67:503–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackell GH (2012) Animal selection, genetics and genomics for low carbon livestock production. In: Proceeding of the 15th AAAP Animal Science Congress 7 Symposium 7: carbon footprint and low carbon livestock production. https://www.academia.edu/4000303/Symposium_7_Carbon_footprint_and_low_carbon_livestock_production

  • Sirohi S, Michaelowa A (2007) Sufferer and cause: Indian livestock and climate change. Clim Change 85:285–298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sirohi S, Michaelowa A (2008) Implementing CDM for Indian dairy sector: prospects and issues. Clim Policy 8(1):62–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirohi S, Upadhyay RC (2009) Economics of mitigation of GHG emission from livestock. In: Aggarwal PK (ed) Global climate change and Indian agriculture: case studies from the ICAR network project. ICAR, New Delhi, pp 140–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirohi S, Michaelowa A, Sirohi SK (2007) Mitigation options for enteric methane emissions from dairy animals: an evaluation for potential CDM projects in India. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 12:259–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith B (2012) Transnational carbon-trading standards: improving the transparency and coordination of post-Kyoto carbon trading markets. Pace Environ Law Rev 30(1):325

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley P, Gonzalez G (2014) Sharing the stage: state of the voluntary carbon markets 2014, executive summary. Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, Rosales M, de Haan C (2006) Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options, FAO agriculture technical paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton PK, Herrero M (2010) Potential for reduced methane and carbon dioxide emissions from livestock and pasture management in the tropics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(46):19667–19672. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0912890107

  • Thornton PK, Van de Steeg J, Notenbaert AM, Herrero M (2009) The impacts of climate change on livestock and livestock systems in developing countries: a review of what we know and what we need to know. Agric Syst 101:113–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tubiello FN, Salvatore M, Rossi S, Ferrara A, Fitton N, Smith P (2013) The FAOSTAT database of greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. Environ Res Lett 8:1–11. doi:10.1088/1748‐9326/8/1/015009, ISSN: 1748–9326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC (2013) GHG Data from UNFCCC. http://unfccc.int/ghg_data/ghg_data_unfccc

  • UNFCCC (2014) New baseline and monitoring methodology recommendation form (Version 02.0)SSC-NM094. Strategic supplementation of a small holder dairy sector to increase productivity and reduce methane emissions. http://cdm.unfccc.int/

  • World Bank (2014) State and trends of carbon pricing 2014. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Smita Sirohi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sirohi, S. (2015). Opportunities and Challenges for Carbon Trading from Livestock Sector. In: Sejian, V., Gaughan, J., Baumgard, L., Prasad, C. (eds) Climate Change Impact on Livestock: Adaptation and Mitigation. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2265-1_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics