Skip to main content

Decision Modeling Approach for Eco-Driven Flexible Green Supply Chain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systemic Flexibility and Business Agility

Part of the book series: Flexible Systems Management ((FLEXSYS))

Abstract

Consideration is being given to the interaction of flexibility and green perspective of supply chains. Flexibility has already been considered to be an important differentiator in the current market place. Several researches have already emphasized the need for flexibility in supply chains and demonstrated its effectiveness. Substantial research efforts are still required to incorporate the flexibility with a motivation to improving performance of green supply chains (GSCs). By understanding how organizational initiatives and government policies we can decision flexibility into design and management of GSCs. In doing so, we will initially focus on environmental management perspective. Here, decision perspective from environmental factors is moved to the technological decisions related to postdisposal disposition of products. In the present scenario, this is a critical topic that captures increasing concerns of organizations over sustainability, which is driven by government legislation and environmental pressures. The implication of this research emphasizes on the potential to affect future government policy and current production system, and to identify new business models. In furthering this analysis, we investigate and provide a background to better understand the current trends in this multidisciplinary field that intersect with GSC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bansal P, Roth K (2000) Why companies to go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Acad Manage J 43(4):717–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon JP, Homburg C (2001) Buyers–supplier relationships and customer firm costs. J Mark 65(1):29–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher M, Towill D (2006) A taxonomy for selecting global supply chain strategies. Int J Logist Manage 17(2):277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D (1999) What drives companies to seek ISO 14000 certification. Pollution Engineering International 31(7):14–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordeiro JJ, Sarkis J (1997) Environmental proactivism and firm performance: evidence from security analyst earnings forecasts. Bus Strategy Environ 6(2):104–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doonan J, Lanoie P, Laplante B (2005) Analysis determinants of environmental performance in the Canadian pulp and paper industry: an assessment from inside the industry. Environ Ecol Econ 55(5):73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giannoccaro I, Pontrantrandolfo P, Scozzi B (2003) Uncertainty in supply chain inventory management: a fuzzy approach. Eur J Oper Res 149:185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottberg A, Morris J, Pollard S, Mark-Herbert C, Cook M (2006) Producer responsibility, waste minimization and the WEEE directive: case studies in eco-design from the European lighting sector. Sci Total Environ 359(1–3):38–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood M (2001) The importance of stakeholders according to business leaders. Bus Soc Rev 106(1):29–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall J (2000) Environmental supply chain dynamics. J Clean Prod 8(6):455–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall J (2006) Environmental supply chain innovation, In: Sarkis J (ed) Greening the supply chain. Springer, Berlin, S 233–249

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Handfield RB, Walton SV, Seegers LK, Melnyk SA (1997) Green value chain practice in the furniture industry. J Oper Manage 15:293–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawken P, Lovins AB, Lovins LH (1999) Natural capitalism. Back Bay Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays JM, Hill AV (2001) A preliminary investigation of the relationships between employee motivation/vision, service learning, and perceived service quality. J Oper Manage 19(3):335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriques I, Sadorsky P (1996) The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: an empirical approach. J Environ Econ Manage 30(3):381–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hervani A, Helms MM, Sarkis J (2005) Performance measurement for green supply chain management, benchmarking. Int J 12(4):330–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui IK, Chan AHS, Pun KF (2001) A study of the environmental management system implementation practices. J Clean Prod 9(3):269–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe AB, Newell RG, Stavins RN (2005) A tale of two market failures: technology and environmental policy. Ecol Econ 54(2–3):164–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linton JD, Klassen R, Jayaraman V (2007) Sustainable supply chains: an introduction. J Oper Manage 25(1):1075–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HL (2004) A triple—a supply chain. Harv Bus Rev 82(10):102–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Madaan J, Kumar P, Chan FTS (2012) Decision and information interoperability for improving performance of product recovery systems. Decis Support Syst 53:448–53457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madu CN, Kuei C, Madu IE (2002) A hierarchic metric approach for integration of green issues in manufacturing: a paper recycling application. Int J Environ Sci Technol 64(3):261–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangla S, Madaan J, Chan FTS (2012) Analysis of performance focused variables for multi-objective flexible decision modeling approach of product recovery systems. Glob J Flex Syst Manage 13(2):77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J, Scott W, Strange D (1987) Centralization, fragmentation, and school district complexity. Administrative Sci Q 32:186–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer Goldstein SM, Collier DA (2001) An empirical test of the causal relationships in the Baldrige health care pilot criteria. J Oper Manage 19(4):403–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver C (1991) Strategic responses to institutional processes. Acad Manage Rev 16(1):145–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohlen TL, Farris MT (1992) Reverse logistics in plastics recycling. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage 22(7):35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48(3):9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samar S, Madaan J, Chan FTS, Kannan S (2013) Inventory management of perishable products: a time decay linked logistic approach. Int J Prod Res 51:3864–3879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar A, Mohapatra PKJ (2006) Evaluation of supplier capability and performance: a method for supply base reduction. J Purch Supply Manage 12(3):148–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis J (1998) Theory and methodology evaluating environmentally conscious business practices. Eur J Oper Res 107(1):159–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis J (1995) Manufacturing strategy and environmental consciousness. Technovation 15(2):79–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis J (2003) A strategic decision framework for green supply chain management. J Clean Prod 11(4):397–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkis J, Tamarkin M (2005) Real options analysis for green trading: the case of greenhouse gases. Eng Econ 50:273–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savitz AW, Weber K (2006) The triple bottom line. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson D, Power D, Samson D (2007) Greening the automotive supply chain: a relationship perspective. Int J Oper Prod Manage 27(1):28–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheu C, Chae B, Yang C-L (2004) National differences and ERP implementation: issues and challenges. Omega 32(5):361–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalishali MK, Tseng T, David SA (2009) Opportunities in green supply chain management. Coastal Bus J 8(1):18–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava SK (1995) The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Acad Manage Rev 20(4):936–960

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava SK (2007) Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. Int J Manage Rev 9(1):53–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manage J 20(3):571–610

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundarakani B, Desouza R, Goh M, Wagner SM, Manikandan S (2010) Modeling carbon footprints across the supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 128:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushil (2009) Interpretive ranking process. Global J Flex Syst Manage 10(4):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibben-Lembke RS, Rogers DS (2002) Differences between forward and reverse logistics in retail environment. Supply Chain Manage 7(5):271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vachon S, Klassen RD (2006) Extending green practices across the supply chain: the impact of upstream and downstream integration. Int J Oper Prod Manage 26(7):795–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaidya OS, Kumar S (2006) Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur J Oper Res 169:1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadhwa S, Madaan J, Chan FTS (2009) Flexibility focused decision and information sharing model for product recovery system. Global J Flex Syst Manage 10(3):15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Bi J, Wheeler D, Wang J, Cao D, Lu G, Wang Y (2004) Environmental performance rating and disclosure: China’s green watch program. J Environ Manage 71(2):123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Sarkis J (2006) An inter-sectoral comparison of green supply chain management in China: drivers and practices. J Clean Prod 14(5):472–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Zhao Y (2004) Business sectors in China’s social capacity for environmental management. In: Proceeding for the second symposium on SCEM (Social Capacity Development on Environmental Management and International Cooperation in Developing Countries), January 12–14, Hiroshima University, Japan, S 44–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai K (2008) Confirmation of measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. Int J Prod Econ 111(2):261–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jitendra Madaan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Madaan, J., Mangla, S. (2015). Decision Modeling Approach for Eco-Driven Flexible Green Supply Chain. In: Sushil, ., Chroust, G. (eds) Systemic Flexibility and Business Agility. Flexible Systems Management. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2151-7_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics