Skip to main content

Auszug

Der Blick in die Zukunft fasziniert Menschen seit jeher. Egal, ob man Aussagen zur Erderwärmung, zu Wahlen oder zu Aktienkursen trifft - eine breite Aufmerksamkeit ist gesichert. Dies kann sich jedoch immer dann in ein Problem umkehren, wenn die Güte der getroffenen Prognosen unzureichend ist und rein gar nicht mit den tatsächlich eintretenden Ereignissen übereinstimmt. Besonders krasse Fehlprognosen werden gern von der Presse aufgegriffen, entsprechende Beiträge (z.B. über das Versagen von Bank-Analysten) entbehren meist nicht einer gewissen Schadenfreude (Tabelle 28.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Ahlburg D.A. (1992): Error Measures and the Choice of a Forecast Method, InternationalJournal of Forecasting, 8, 99–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andres P. und M. Spiwoks (2000): State of the Art der statistischen Ex-post-Beurteilung von Prognosen, Sofia-Studien zur Institutionenanalyse Nr. 00-1, Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong J.S. (1985): On the Value of Improved Accuracy Forecasting, in: Armstrong J.S. (Hrsg.): Long-Range Forecasting, New York, 452–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong J.S. (2001): Evaluating Forecasting Methods, in: Armstrong J.S. (Hrsg.): Principles of Forecasting, Boston et al., 443–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong J.S. und F. Collopy (1992): Error Measures for Generalizing about Forecasting Methods: Empirical Comparisons, InternationalJournal of Forecasting, 8, 69–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong J.S. und R. Fildes (1995): On the Selection of Error Measures for Comparisons Among Forecasting Methods, Journal of Forecasting, 14, 67–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arora H.K. und D.J. Smyth (1990): Forecasting the Developing World: An Accuracy Analysis of the IMF’ sForecasts, InternationalJournal of Forecasting, 6, 393–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliemel F. (1973): Theil’s Forecast Accuracy Coefficient: A Clarification, Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 444–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockhoff K. (1977): Prognoseverfahren für die Unternehmensplanung, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone R. und J.S. Armstrong (1982): Evaluation of Extrapolative Forecasting Methods: Results of a Survey of Academicians and Practitioners, Journal of Forecasting, 1, 215–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield C. (1988): Editorial: Apples, Oranges and Mean Square Error, International Journal of Forecasting, 4, 515–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatfield C. (1992): A Commentary on Error Measures, International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 100–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements M.P. und D.F. Hendry (1993): On the limitations of Comparing Mean Square Forecast Errors, Journal of Forecasting, 12, 617–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collopy F. und J.S. Armstrong (1992): Generalization and Communication Issues in the Use of Error Measures: A Reply, International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 107–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuaresma J.C. und J. Hlouskova (2005): Beating the Random Walk in Central and Eastern Europe, Journal of Forecasting, 24, 189–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fildes R. (1992a): The Evaluation of Extrapolative Forecasting Methods, International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fildes R. (1992b): On Error Measures: A Response to the Commentators: the Best Error measure?, International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 109–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner Jr. E.S. (1990): Evaluating Forecast Performance in an Inventory Control System, Management Science, 36, 490–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackl P. (2005): Einführung in die Ökonometrie, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henschel H. (1979): Wirtschaftsprognosen, München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden G. und G. Coble-Neal (2005): Forecasting International Bandwidth Capability, Journal of Forecasting, 24, 299–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis S. und M. Hibon (1979): Accuracy of Forecasting: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 142, 2, 97–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makridakis S. und M. Hibon (2000): The M3-Competition: Results, Conclusions and Implications, International Journal of Forecasting, 16, 451–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews B.P. und A. Diamantopoulos (1994): Towards a Taxonomy of Forecast Error Measures, Journal of Forecasting, 13, 409–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer J.T. und K.B. Kahn (1995): Forecasting Technique Familiarity, Satisfaction, Usage, and Application, Journal of Forecasting, 14, 465–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Psaradakis Z. und F. Spagnolo (2005): Forecast Performance of Nonlinear Error-Correction Models with Multiple Regimes, Journal of Forecasting, 24, 119–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarze J. (1980): Statistische Kenngrößen zur Ex-post-Beurteilung von Prognosen (Prognosefehlermaße), in: Schwarze J. (Hrsg.): Angewandte Prognoseverfahren, Herne/Berlin, 317–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil H. (1955): Who Forecasts Best?, International Economic Papers, 5, 194–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil H. (1965): Economic Forecasts and Policy, 2. Aufl., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theil H. (1966): Applied Economic Forecasting, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler R.L. und A.H. Murphy (1992): On Seeking a Best Performance Measure or a Best Forecasting Method, International Journal of Forecasting, 8, 104–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Sönke Albers Daniel Klapper Udo Konradt Achim Walter Joachim Wolf

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler |d GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barrot, C. (2007). Prognosegütemaße. In: Albers, S., Klapper, D., Konradt, U., Walter, A., Wolf, J. (eds) Methodik der empirischen Forschung. Gabler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-9121-8_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics