Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beidhändiges Management im langfristigen, radikalen diskontinuierlichen Übergang der Automobilindustrie in die Elektromobilität

Unterschiede zwischen Automobilherstellern und -zulieferern

  • Chapter
Zukünftige Entwicklungen in der Mobilität

Zusammenfassung

Die Automobilindustrie war lange ein Beispiel für eine weitgehend stabile Branche mit wenigen und relativ geringen Veränderungen (vgl. [4][36][27]) bei Herstellern wie bei vielen Zulieferern. Mit dem Übergang von Verbrennungsmotoren zur Elektromobilität erfahren nun viele Automobilunternehmen erstmals einen radikalen diskontinuierlichen Wandel, der sehr lange andauern wird.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Andriopoulos, C./Lewis, M.W. (2009): Eploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation, in: Organization Science, Vol. 20, S. 696–717.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andriopoulos, C./Lewis, M.W. (2010): Managing innovation paradoxes: ambidexterity lessons from leading product design companies, in: Long Range Planning, Vol. 43, S. 104–122.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Albers, S. (2005): Diffusion und Adaption von Innovationen, in: Albers, S./Gassmann, O. (Hrsg.): Handbuch Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement, Wiesbaden, S. 415–434.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Basil, D.C./Cook, C.W. (1974): The management of change, London.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bass, F.M.(1969):A new product growth model for consumer durables, in:Management Science, Vol.15, S.215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beckmann, C.M. (2006): The influence of founding team company affiliations on firm behaviour, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 49, S. 741–758.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Benner, M.J./Tushman, M.L. (2003): Exploitation, exploration and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited, in: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 28, S. 238–256.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Birkinshaw, J./Gibson, C. (2004): Building Ambidexterity into an organization, in: Sloan Management Review, Vol. 45, S. 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bleymüller, J./Gehlert, G./Gülicher, H. (2008): Statistik für Wirtschaftswissenschaftler. 15. Aufl., München.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cyert, R. M./March, J.G. (1963): A behavioural theory of the firm, Englewood Cliffs/ NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davila, T./Epstein, M.J./Shelton, R. (2006): Making innovation work. How to manage it, measureit, and profit from it, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Frese, E. (2005): Grundlagen der Organisation: Konzept – Prinzipien – Strukturen, 9. Aufl., Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gibson, C. B./Birkinshaw, J.(2004):The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of orginizational ambidexterity, in:Academy of Management Journal, Vol.47, S.209–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gilbert, C.G.(2006):Change in the presence of residual fit: Can competing frameworks coexist?in:Organizational Science, Vol.17, S.150–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Golder, P.N./Tellis, G.J.(1997):Will it ever fly? Modelling the takeoff of really new consumer durables, in:Marketing Science, Vol.16, S.256–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta, A. K./Smith, K. G./Shalley, C. E.(2006):The interplay between exploration and exploitation, in:Academy of Management Journal, Vol.49, S.693–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. He, Z.-L./Wong, P.-K.(2004):Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis, in:Organization Science, Vol.15, S.481–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jelinek, M./Schoonhoven, B.C. (1993): The Innovation Marathon, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Konlechner, S.W./Güttel, W.H. (2009): Kontinuierlicher Wandel durch Ambidexterity. Vor handenes Wissen nutzen und gleichzeitig neues entwickeln, in: Zeitschrift für Organisation, Vol. 78, S. 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Laux, H./Liermann, F. (2005): Grundlagen der Organisation, 6. Aufl., Berlin u.a.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Levinthal, D./March, J.(1993):Myopia of learning, in:Strategic Management Journal, Vol.14, S.95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. March, J. G.(1991):Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning, in:Organization Science, Vol.2, S.71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McKinsey&Company (2011): Boost. Transforming the powertrain value chain – a portefolio challenge. Düsseldorf 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mette, M. (1999): Strategisches Management im Konjunkturzyklus, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Milgrom, P./Roberts, J.(1990):The economics of modern manufacturing. Technology, strategy, and organization, in:The American Economic Review, Vol.80, S.511–528.

    Google Scholar 

  26. O´Reilly, C.A./Tushman, M.L.(2008):Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability. Resolving the innovator´s dilemma, in:Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.28, S.185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Proff, H. (2002): Konsistente Gesamtunternehmensstrategien. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Proff, H. (2010): Coming out of the crisis in the auto industry: Ambidextrous management of the transition to electric mobility (=Paper presented at the 18th Gerpisa Colloquium, Berlin, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Proff, H. (2011): What will happen to Brazilian automotive subsidiaries after their parent companies make the transition to electric mobility? Accepted for: International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management (IJATM), 4/2011.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Proff, H./Haberle, K. (2010): Begrenzung von Ambidextrie durch konsistentes dynamisches Management, in: Stephan, M., Kerber, W. (Hrsg.): Jahrbuch Strategisches Kompetenz-Management. Bd. 4: „Ambidextrie“: Der unternehmerische Drahtseilakt zwischen Ressourcenexploration und exploitation, S. 81–118.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Raisch, S./Birkinshaw, J.(2008):Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators, in:Journal of Management, Vol.34, S.375–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Raisch, S./Birkinshaw, J./Probst, G./Tushman, M.L.(2009).Organizational ambidexterity: Balancing exploitation and exploration for sustained performance, in:Organisation Science, Vol.20, S.685–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rogers, E.M. (1966): Diffusion of innovations. New York. (4. Aufl. 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Roland Berger Strategy Consultants (Hrsg.) (2011): Automotive landscape 2025: Opportunities and challenges ahead, February 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rotaermel, F.T./Deeds, D.L.(2004):Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology, in:Strategic Management Journal, Vol.25, S.201–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sanchez, R. (1997): Managing articulated knowledge in competence-based competition, in: Sanchez, R./Heene, A. (Hrsg.): Strategic learning and knowledge management, Chichester, S. 163–187.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Schmidt, R.H./Terberger, E. (1997): Grundzüge der Investitions- und Finanzierungstheorie. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Simsek, Z.(2009):Organizational ambidexterity: Towards a multilevel understanding, in:Journal of Management Studies, Vol.46, S.597–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Simsek, Z./Heavey, C./Veiga, J.F.(2009):A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity´s conceptualizations, antecedents and outcomes, in:Journal of Management Studies, Vol.46, S.864–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Smith, W. K./Tushman, M. L.(2005):Managing strategic contradictions: a top management model for managing innovation streams, in:Organization Science, Vol.16, S.522–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Taylor, A./Helfat, C. E. (2009): Organizational linkages for surviving technological change: Complementary assets, middle management, and ambidexterity, in: Organizational Science, Vol. 20, S.718–739.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Thompson, J.D. (1967): Organizations in action. Social science based of administrative theory, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tushman, M. L./O’Reilly III, C. A.(1996):Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change, in:California Management Review, Vol.34, S.8–30.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zott, C./ Amit, R./ Massa, L. (2010): The business model: theoretical roots, recent developments, and future research, IESE working paper, WP-862.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg-Essen, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Heike Proff

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Heike Proff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg-Essen, Deutschland

    Heike Proff , Jörg Schönharting , Dieter Schramm  & Jürgen Ziegler , ,  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Gabler Verlag | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Proff, H. (2012). Beidhändiges Management im langfristigen, radikalen diskontinuierlichen Übergang der Automobilindustrie in die Elektromobilität. In: Proff, H., Schönharting, J., Schramm, D., Ziegler, J. (eds) Zukünftige Entwicklungen in der Mobilität. Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-7117-3_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation