Skip to main content

Are industrial districts more conducive to innovative production? The case of Emilia Romagna

  • Chapter
The Evolution of Industrial Districts

Part of the book series: Contributions to Economics ((CE))

Abstract

During the last years, the debate about the characteristics of local development has undergone a substantial expansion. New interdisciplinary theoretical approaches have spurred a series of methodological and empirical instruments, which allowed for more precise and effective analyses of the contributions of local technological change to long-run economic growth. This process has been paralleled by a substantial increase in the effort of international organisations responsible for producing data, in refining and improving the coverage of the main features of innovative activity. For instance, OECD acted both as locus for theoretical and methodological debate and as data collector and organiser of new and improved sets of indicators. Also EUROSTAT acted so as to enlarge and harmonise already existing datasets (for example, the Community Innovation Survey).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow K. (1962), “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention”, in: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aster (1998), Techwatch 98. L’innovazione tecnologica in Emilia Romagna. Primi risultati dell’indagine campionaria, ASTER, Bologna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becattini G. (1990), The Marshallian Industrial District as a Socio-Economic Notion, in: Pike F.,. (Eds.), Industrial Districts and Interfirm Co-operation in Italy, International Labor Office, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusco S. (1982), “The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralisation and Social Integration”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 6, pp. 167–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cainelli G., Leoncini R. (1999), “Externalities and Long-Term Local Industrial Development: Some Empirical Evidence from Italy”, Revue d’Economie Industrielle, n. 90, pp. 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cainelli G., Leoncini R., Montini A. (2001), “Struttura produttiva e sviluppo regionale di lungo periodo in Italia”, Moneta e Credito, n. 216, pp. 461–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cnel (1997), Innovazione, piccole imprese e distretti industriali, 3° Rapporto Cnel/Ceris-Cnr, Documenti Cnel, n. 7, CNEL, Roma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi G. (1988), Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 26, pp. 1120–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E., Kallal H., Scheinkman J., Schleifer A. (1992), “Growth in Cities”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 100, pp. 1126–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches Z. (1995), “R&D and Productivity: Econometric Results and Measurement Issues”, in: Stoneman P. (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson V., Kuncoro A., Turner M. (1995), “Industrial Development in Cities”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 103, pp. 1067–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight F. (1921), Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit, Houghton Muffin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J. (1969), The Economy of Cities, Vintage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones C, Williams J. (1997), Measuring the Social Return to R&D, mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A. (1920), Principles of Economics, Eight Edition, MacMillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel P., Pavitt K. (1995), “Patterns of Technological Activity: Their Measurement and Interpretation”, in: Stoneman P. (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt K. (1984), “Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory”, Research Policy, vol. 13, pp. 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santarelli E., Sterlacchini A. (1996), “Statistiche e banche dati sull’innovazione tecnologica a livello di impresa: la situazione italiana”, Rivista Italiana degli Economisti, vol. 1, pp. 285–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter J. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter J. (1943), Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leoncini, R., Lotti, F. (2004). Are industrial districts more conducive to innovative production? The case of Emilia Romagna. In: Cainelli, G., Zoboli, R. (eds) The Evolution of Industrial Districts. Contributions to Economics. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2700-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2700-2_12

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-0095-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-2700-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics