Abstract
In the post-Kyoto process, it will be very important to face the global climate challenge on a broad scale: simply focusing on the OECD countries would not only imply the restriction of attention to a group of countries, which around 2010 will be responsible for less than 50% of global greenhouse gas emissions; it would also mean to ignore the enormous economic and political potential which could be mobilized within a more global cooperation framework. The Copenhagen Summit 2009 will effectively set a new agenda for long-term climate policy, where many observers expect commitments to not only come from EU countries, Australia, Japan and Russia, but also from the USA and big countries with modest per capita income, such as China and India. The ambitious goals envisaged for long-term reduction of greenhouse gases will require new efforts in many fields, including innovation policy and energy policy.
This paper has been previously published in International Economics and Economic Policy, Special Issue on “International Economics of Resources and Resource Policy”, Volume 7, Numbers 2–3/August 2010.
We appreciate the technical support by Samir Kadiric (EIIW) and the comments by Peter Bartelmus, New York, Columbia University and ZhongXiang Zhang, Honolulu; editorial assistance by Michael Agner, University of Odense and Lilla Voros (EIIW) are also appreciated. This research has benefited from financial support from vita foundation, Oberursel.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
One can mention the following back-stop technologies concerning today’s knowledge level: Solar power and hydrogen and other renewable energy technologies, possible nuclear fission systems on the basis of the breeder reactors or light-water reactors with uranium production, new nuclear fusion techniques (Hensing et al. 1998).
References
Aghion P et al (2009) No green growth without innovation. Bruegel Policy Brief, Brussels, Nov 2009
Balassa B (1965) Trade liberalization and revealed comparative advantage. Manchester School 33:99–123
Bartelmus P (ed) (2001) Wohlstand entschleiern. Über Geld, Lebensqualität und Zukunftsfähigkeit. Hirzel, Stuttgart
Borbèly D (2006) Trade specialization in the enlarged European Union, Physica. Springer, Heidelberg
BP (2009) Statistical review of world energy. BP, London
Bretschger L (2009) Sustainability economics, resource efficiency, and the green new deal. In: Bleischwitz R, Welfens PJJ, Zhang Z (eds) International economics of sustainable growth and resource policy. Springer, Berlin
Cobb CW (1989) The index for sustainable economic welfare. In: Daly J, Cobb CW (eds) For the common good – redirecting the economy towards community, the environment, and a sustainable future. Beacon, Boston
Dasgupta P, Heal G (1979) Economic theory and exhaustible resources. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Dimaranan B, Ianchovichina E, Martin W (2009) How will growth in China and India affect the world economy. World Econ 145:551–571
Enos JL (1962) Invention and innovation in the petroleum refining industry. In: NBER (ed) Rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 299–321
European Commission (2009) GDP and beyond. Measuring progress in a changing world COM(2009) 433 final. European Commission, Brussels
European Environmental Agency (2008) Energy and environment report 2008. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/eea_report_2008_6
Farmer K, Stadler I (2005) Marktdynamik und Umweltpolitik. LIT Verlag, Wien
Furtado A (1997) The French system of innovation in the oil industry: some lessons about the role of public policies and sectoral patterns of technological change in innovation networking. Res Policy 25(8):1243–1259
Global Footprint Network http://www.globalfootprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/ecological_debtors_and_creditors/
Grubb M (2004) Technology innovation and climate change policy. Keio Econ Stud 41(2):103–132
Grupp H (1999) Environment-friendly innovation by price signals or regulation? An empirical investigation for Germany. Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 219:611–631
Hatakenaka S, Westnes P, Gjelsvik M, Lester RK (2006) The regional dynamics of innovation: a comparative study of oil and gas industry development in Stavanger and Aberdeen. Paper presented at the SPRU 40th Anniversary Conference University of Sussex
Hensing I, Pfaffenberger W, Ströbele W (1998) Energiewirtschaft. Oldenbourg, München
Hierl J, Palinkas P (2007) Energy technology policy in Europe, technology dynamics, growth and reform policies in the US and Europe. In: Welfens PJJ, Heise M, Tilly R (eds) 50 years of EU economic dynamics. Springer, Berlin
Hotelling H (1931) The economics of exhaustible resources. J Polit Econ 39:137–175
Keller W (2004) International technology diffusion. J Econ Lit 42(3):752–782
Khalatbari F (1977) Market imperfections and the optimum rate of depletion of natural resources. Economica 44:409–414
Klepper G, Peterson S (2006) Emission trading, CDM, JI, and more – the climate strategy of the EU. Energy J 27:1–26
Latif M (2009) Klimawandel: Hintergründe und Zukunftsszenarien. Paper presented at the conference climate change – status and perspectives of Verein für Sozialpolitik, Magdeburg, 9 Sept 2009
Levy A (2000) From hotelling to backstop technology. University of Wollongong Department of Economics Working Paper Series 2000 WP 00-04
Malthus R (1798) An essay on the principle of population. J. Johnson, London
Nordhaus WD (1974) Resources as a constraint on growth. Am Econ Assoc 64(2):22–27
Nordhaus WD (2006) The stern review on the economics of climate change. NBER Working Paper No. W12741
OECD (1999) The Environmental Goods and Services Industry, Manual for Data Collection and Analysis, Paris
OECD (2008) Handbook on constructing composite indicators. OECD, Paris
Sinn H-W (1981) Stock dependent extraction costs and the technological efficiency of resource depletion. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften 101:507–517
Sprenger RU (1999) Economic globalization, FDI, environment and employment. In: Welfens PJJ (ed) Internationalization of the economy and environmental policy options. Springer, New York
Stern N et al (2006) The economics of climate change (Stern review). HM Treasury, London
Stevenson B, Wolfers J (2008) Economic growth and subjective well-being: reassessing the Easterlin paradox. NBER Paper No. 14282, Cambridge, MA
Stiglitz JE (1974) Growth with exhaustible natural resources: efficient and optimal growth paths. Rev Econ Stud 41:123–137, Symposium on the economics of exhaustible resources
Wacker H, Blank J (1999) Ressourcenökonomik Band II: Einführung in die Theorie erschöpfbarer natürlicher Ressourcen. Verlag Oldenbourg, München
Wackernagel M (1994) Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: a tool for planning toward sustainability. PhD Thesis, School of Community and Regional Planning, The University of British Columbia
Wackernagel M, Rees R (1996) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society, Gabriola Island, BC
Walker W (1986) Information technology and energy supply. Energ Policy 23:466–488
WDI (2008) World development indicators 2008, World Bank online database. World Bank, Washington, DC
Welfens PJJ (2008) Innovations in macroeconomics, 2nd edn. Springer, New York
Welfens PJJ (2009) Explaining the oil price dynamics. EIIW Discussion Paper No.169
Wiedmann T, Minx J (2007) ISAUK research report 07-01, a definition of carbon footprint. http://www.isa-research.co.uk/docs/ISA-UK_Report_07-01_carbon_footprint.pdf
World Bank (2006) Where is the wealth of nations? measuring capital for the XXI century. World Bank, Washington, DC
WTO (1999) Trade and environment at the WTO, Special Issues 4. WTO, Geneva
Yale/Columbia (2005) Environmental sustainability index. Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy (YCELP) and the Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) of Columbia University, Columbia
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Physica-Verlag HD
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Welfens, P.J.J., Perret, J.K., Erdem, D. (2011). Global Economic Sustainability Indicator: Analysis and Policy Options for the Copenhagen Process. In: Bleischwitz, R., Welfens, P., Zhang, Z. (eds) International Economics of Resource Efficiency. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2601-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2601-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Physica-Verlag HD
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-2600-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-2601-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)