Skip to main content

Coopetition in Infomediation: General Analysis and Application to e-Tourism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Tourism Economics

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Clearly, reality is a bit more complex than that as an EMP also achieves a promotional role, and as sellers have the opportunity to simultaneously register with and EMP an an OIP (for instance, a supplier may go to an OIP because this gives him a larger promotion scope, and simultaneously adhere to an EMP in order to increase his sales). The latter phenomenon is usually referred to as “ multihoming” . Considering the complexities resulting from multihoming (which can also exist on the buyers’ side) goes beyond the scope of the present analysis.

  2. 2.

    Here are a few examples of tourism oriented OIPs: calagtour.org, egypthotelsdb.com, ruralindex.net, ruraltrip.com.

  3. 3.

    Some examples of tourism oriented EMPs are: booking.com, nouvelles-frontieres.com, travelonline.com, govoyages.com.

  4. 4.

    As Varian et Lyman (2002) document it, 550 billion new documents and more than 7,5 million Web pages are created every day.

  5. 5.

    We restrict the attention to parameter configurations such that \( 2-d-2c-d\left( m-\gamma \right) >0\).

  6. 6.

    However, as we discussed above, a supplier might not want to be joined if the competition effect dominates the cooperation effect (that is, it is possible to have \(\pi ^{AN\ }>\pi ^{AA}>\pi ^{NA}\)).

  7. 7.

    A technical appendix containing the detailed computations can be obtained from the authors upon request.

  8. 8.

    It can be shown that \(f(n)\) first increases with n, then reaches a maximum and then starts to decrease with n; the reason for the decrease is to be found in the competition effect which makes \(\pi ^{in}(n)\) decrease with n for \(n>N/2\).

  9. 9.

    In our model, the indirect network effects on the buyers’ side are implicitly taken into account through the demand expansion resulting from increased suppliers’ participation.

References

  • Akoka J, Lang D (2002) Les places de marché électroniques et reconfiguration des processus inter-organisationnels. Actes du 7`eme colloque de l’AIM, Tunisie

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong M, Wright J (2007) Two-sided markets, competitive bottlenecks and exclusive contracts. Econ Theo, 32(2):353–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baile S, Trahand J (1999) Les systèmes d’information interorganisationnels, contributions et cadre des recherches. Systèmes d’Information et Management 4(2):3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey J, Bakos Y (1997) An exploratory study of the emerging role of electronic intermediaries. Int J Electron Comm 1(3):7–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumard P, Benvenuti JA (1998) Compétitivité et systémes d’information: de l’outil d’analyse au management stratégique. Inter Editions, Paris, 249p

    Google Scholar 

  • Benda J (2004) L’utilisation d’une place de marché électronique : une stratégie collective contre des stratégies individuelles ? – une étude exploratoire de trois cas. Actes de la 13`eme conf´erence de l’AIMS

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson M, Kock S (2000) Coopetition in business networks – to cooperate and compete simultaneously. Ind Mark Manage 29(5):411–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biglaiser G (1993) Middlemen as experts. RAND J Econ 24(2):212–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brousseau E (2002) The governance of transactions by commercial intermediaries: an analysis of the re-engineering of intermediation by electronic commerce. Int J Econ Bus 9(3):353–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson E, Seidmann A (1997) A call for exploration: introduction to special issue on frontier research on information systems and economics. Manage Sci 43(12):1605–1607

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhalis D, Licata MC (2002) The future eTourism intermediaries. Tourism Manage 23(3):207–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhalis D (2001) Tourism and cyberspace. Ann Tourism Res 28(1):232–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caillaud B, Jullien B (2003) Competing cybermediaries. Eur Econ Rev 45:797–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curchod C (2006) Stratégies d’intermédiation et dynamiques des marchés: une relecture du phénomène Internet. Actes de la 15ème conférence de l’AIMS. Genève, 13–16 juin

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Corte V, Sciarelli M (2006) Coopetition among tourist destinations: a resource-based theory perspective. 2nd Workshop on Coopetition Strategy, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolin B, Burgess L, Cooper J (2002) Evaluating the use of theWeb for tourism marketing: a case study from New Zealand. Tourism Manage 23(5):557–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgell DL, Haenisch RT (1995) Coopetition: global tourism beyond the millennium. International Policy Publishing, Kansas City, 148p

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DJ, Hagiu A, Schmalensee R (2005) A surbey of the economic role of software platforms in computer-based industries. CES Econ Stud 51:189–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giaglis MG (2002) Towards a predictive model for electronic marketplaces intermediation opportunities. Working paper, University of the Aegean, Chios, Greece. 18 Paul Belleflamme and Nicolas Neysen

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonz´alez AG (2004) PayPal: the legal status of C2C payment systems. Comput Law Security Report 20(4):293–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jullien B (2005) Two-sided markets and electronic intermediaries. CES Econ Stud 51:235–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig G (1996) Management stratégique: paradoxes, interactions et apprentissages: construction et gestion des activités. Management d’exigences contradictoires, Nathan, Paris, 543p

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin A (2006) The acceptance and use of a business-to-business information system. Int J Inform Manage 26(5):386–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone TW, Yates J, Benjamin R (1987) Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Commun ACM 30(6):484–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalebuff BJ, Brandenburger AM (1996) Co-opetition. Profile books, London, 289p

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordanini A, Pol A (2001) Infomediation and competitive advantage in b2b digital marketplaces. Eur Manage J 19(3):276–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxley JE, Yeung B (2001) E-commerce readiness: institutional environment and international competitiveness. J Int Bus Stud 32(4):705–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesämaa O, Eriksson E (2006) Coopetition among nature-based tourism firms: competition at a local level and cooperation at a destination level. 2nd Workshop on coopetition strategy, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayman L, Molina A (2001) Internet-based tourism services: business issues and trends. Futures 33(7):589–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochet J-C, Tirole J (2003) Platform competition in two-sided markets. J Eur Econ Assoc n_1:990–1029

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein A, Wolinsky A (1987) Middelmen. Q J Econ 102::581–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spulber DF (2003) The intermediation theory of the firm: integrating economic and management approaches to strategy. Manage Decis Econ 24:253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spulber DF (1996) Market microstructure and intermediation. J Econ Perspect 10(3):135–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran S (2004) Systèmes d’information inter-organisationnels et processus concurrentiels: le cas des places de marché électroniques. Document de travail, Universit´e Paris IX Dauphine, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian H, Lyman P (2002) How much information? University of California in Berkeley, Berkeley, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright J (2004) The determinants of optimal interchange fees in payment systems. J Ind Econ 52:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Belleflamme .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Physica-Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Belleflamme, P., Neysen, N. (2009). Coopetition in Infomediation: General Analysis and Application to e-Tourism. In: Matias, Á., Nijkamp, P., Sarmento, M. (eds) Advances in Tourism Economics. Physica-Verlag HD. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2124-6_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics