Abstract
In this paper we propose to use the consistency of preferences in order to endogenously assign different weights to decision makers in a consensual dynamics process. For this purpose, we first define a consistency index for preferences expressed by means of fuzzy preference relations. Then we introduce this index in an iterative law for updating the individual preferences. The updating law is formulated in the spirit of some previous papers on consensual dynamics (see for instance [5]) and, as a result, both the initially declared preferences and the present ones (in the ongoing process) act with a strength determined on the basis of their consistency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
L. Basile, L. D’Apuzzo. Inconsistency in Analytic Hierarchy Process, in Proc. 21st Conference of the Associazione per la Matematica Applicata alle Scienze Economiche e Sociali (Roma, Sept. 10–13, 1997 ), 61–66.
C. Carlsson, D. Ehrenberg, P. Eklund, M. Fedrizzi, P. Gustafsson, P. Lindholm, G. Merkuryeva, T. Riissanen, A. Ventre. Consensus in distributed soft environments, European Journal of Operational Research, 61 (1992) 165–185.
M. Fedrizzi. On a consensus measure in a group MCDM problem, in Multiperson Decision Making Models using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory (Theory and Decision Library, series B: Mathematical and Statistical Methods, Vol. 18), J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990.
M. Fedrizzi, M. Fedrizzi and R.A. Marques Pereira. Consensus, dynamics, and group decision making, in Proc. 20th Conference of the Associazione per la Matematica Applicata alle Scienze Economiche e Sociali AMASES’96 (Urbino, Italy, September 1996), published by Università di Urbino, Italy (1996) 243254.
M. Fedrizzi, M. Fedrizzi and R.A. Marques Pereira. Soft consensus and network dynamics in group decision making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 14, pages 63–77, 1999.
Fedrizzi Michele and R.A. Marques Pereira. Positive fuzzy matrices, dominant eigenvalues and an extension of Saaty’s Analytical Hierarchy Process, in Proc. VI International Fuzzy Systems Association World Congress, São Paulo, Brasile, 21–28 luglio 1995, pages 245–247, 1995.
M. Fedrizzi, J. Kacprzyk and S. Zadroiny. An interactive multi-user decision support system for consensus reaching processes using fuzzy logic with linguistic quantifiers, Decision Support Systems, 4 (1988) 313–327.
P.C. Fishburn. SSB utility theory: an economic perspective, Mathematical Social Sciences, 8 (1984) 63–94.
J. Fodor, M. Roubens. Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support. (Theory and Decision Library, series D: System Theory, Knowledge Engineering and Problem Solving, Vol. 14 ), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994.
J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi. ‘Soft’ consensus measures for monitoring real consensus reaching processes under fuzzy preferences, Control and Cybernetics, 15 (1986) 309–323.
J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi. A ‘Soft’ measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences, European Journal of Operational Research, 34 (1988) 316–325.
J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi. A human-consistent degree of consensus based on fuzzy logic with linguistic quantifiers, Mathematical Social Sciences, 18 (1989) 275–290.
J. Kacprzyk, M. Fedrizzi and H. Nurmi. Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 49 (1992) 21–31.
J. Křovák. Ranking alternatives–Comparison of different methods based on binary comparison matrices, European Journal of Operational Research, 32 (1987) 86–95.
R. Narasimhan. A geometric averaging procedure for constructing supertransitive approximation to binary comparison matrices, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 8, pages 53–61, 1982.
H. Nurmi. Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 6 (1981) 249–259.
Saaty T. L. (1977), A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, J. Math. Psychology, 15, 234–281.
Saaty T. L. (1980), The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
T. Tanino. Fuzzy preference relations in group decision making, in Non-conventional preference relations in Decision Making J. Kacprzyk and M. Roubens (eds.), Springer-Verlag, 1988.
T. Tanino. On group decision making under fuzzy preferences, in Multiperson Decision Making Models using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory (Theory and Decision Library, series B: Mathematical and Statistical Methods, Vol. 18), J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990.
X. Wang, E. E. Kerre and D. Ruan. Consistency of judgement matrix and fuzzy weights in fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 3 (1995) n. 1 35–46.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fedrizzi, M., Fedrizzi, M., Pereira, R.A.M. (2002). On the Issue of Consistency in Dynamical Consensual Aggregation. In: Bouchon-Meunier, B., Gutiérrez-Ríos, J., Magdalena, L., Yager, R.R. (eds) Technologies for Constructing Intelligent Systems 1. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 89. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1797-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1797-3_10
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-00329-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1797-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive