Skip to main content

On the Issue of Consistency in Dynamical Consensual Aggregation

  • Chapter
Technologies for Constructing Intelligent Systems 1

Part of the book series: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing ((STUDFUZZ,volume 89))

Abstract

In this paper we propose to use the consistency of preferences in order to endogenously assign different weights to decision makers in a consensual dynamics process. For this purpose, we first define a consistency index for preferences expressed by means of fuzzy preference relations. Then we introduce this index in an iterative law for updating the individual preferences. The updating law is formulated in the spirit of some previous papers on consensual dynamics (see for instance [5]) and, as a result, both the initially declared preferences and the present ones (in the ongoing process) act with a strength determined on the basis of their consistency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Basile, L. D’Apuzzo. Inconsistency in Analytic Hierarchy Process, in Proc. 21st Conference of the Associazione per la Matematica Applicata alle Scienze Economiche e Sociali (Roma, Sept. 10–13, 1997 ), 61–66.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. Carlsson, D. Ehrenberg, P. Eklund, M. Fedrizzi, P. Gustafsson, P. Lindholm, G. Merkuryeva, T. Riissanen, A. Ventre. Consensus in distributed soft environments, European Journal of Operational Research, 61 (1992) 165–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Fedrizzi. On a consensus measure in a group MCDM problem, in Multiperson Decision Making Models using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory (Theory and Decision Library, series B: Mathematical and Statistical Methods, Vol. 18), J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Fedrizzi, M. Fedrizzi and R.A. Marques Pereira. Consensus, dynamics, and group decision making, in Proc. 20th Conference of the Associazione per la Matematica Applicata alle Scienze Economiche e Sociali AMASES’96 (Urbino, Italy, September 1996), published by Università di Urbino, Italy (1996) 243254.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Fedrizzi, M. Fedrizzi and R.A. Marques Pereira. Soft consensus and network dynamics in group decision making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 14, pages 63–77, 1999.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fedrizzi Michele and R.A. Marques Pereira. Positive fuzzy matrices, dominant eigenvalues and an extension of Saaty’s Analytical Hierarchy Process, in Proc. VI International Fuzzy Systems Association World Congress, São Paulo, Brasile, 21–28 luglio 1995, pages 245–247, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Fedrizzi, J. Kacprzyk and S. Zadroiny. An interactive multi-user decision support system for consensus reaching processes using fuzzy logic with linguistic quantifiers, Decision Support Systems, 4 (1988) 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P.C. Fishburn. SSB utility theory: an economic perspective, Mathematical Social Sciences, 8 (1984) 63–94.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Fodor, M. Roubens. Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support. (Theory and Decision Library, series D: System Theory, Knowledge Engineering and Problem Solving, Vol. 14 ), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi. ‘Soft’ consensus measures for monitoring real consensus reaching processes under fuzzy preferences, Control and Cybernetics, 15 (1986) 309–323.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi. A ‘Soft’ measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences, European Journal of Operational Research, 34 (1988) 316–325.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi. A human-consistent degree of consensus based on fuzzy logic with linguistic quantifiers, Mathematical Social Sciences, 18 (1989) 275–290.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Kacprzyk, M. Fedrizzi and H. Nurmi. Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 49 (1992) 21–31.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Křovák. Ranking alternatives–Comparison of different methods based on binary comparison matrices, European Journal of Operational Research, 32 (1987) 86–95.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Narasimhan. A geometric averaging procedure for constructing supertransitive approximation to binary comparison matrices, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 8, pages 53–61, 1982.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Nurmi. Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 6 (1981) 249–259.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Saaty T. L. (1977), A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, J. Math. Psychology, 15, 234–281.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Saaty T. L. (1980), The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  19. T. Tanino. Fuzzy preference relations in group decision making, in Non-conventional preference relations in Decision Making J. Kacprzyk and M. Roubens (eds.), Springer-Verlag, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  20. T. Tanino. On group decision making under fuzzy preferences, in Multiperson Decision Making Models using Fuzzy Sets and Possibility Theory (Theory and Decision Library, series B: Mathematical and Statistical Methods, Vol. 18), J. Kacprzyk and M. Fedrizzi (eds.), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. X. Wang, E. E. Kerre and D. Ruan. Consistency of judgement matrix and fuzzy weights in fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 3 (1995) n. 1 35–46.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fedrizzi, M., Fedrizzi, M., Pereira, R.A.M. (2002). On the Issue of Consistency in Dynamical Consensual Aggregation. In: Bouchon-Meunier, B., Gutiérrez-Ríos, J., Magdalena, L., Yager, R.R. (eds) Technologies for Constructing Intelligent Systems 1. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 89. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1797-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-1797-3_10

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-00329-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7908-1797-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics