Skip to main content

Visual Evoked Responses as a Monitor of Intracranial Pressure During Hyperosmolar Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption

  • Conference paper
Brain Edema IX

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 60))

Summary

Intracarotid mannitol (HBBBD = hyperosmotic BBB disruption) as a method of transiently increasing solute/drug delivery to brain parenchyma has been associated in animals with a 1-2% increase in brain water and an increase in cisternal ICP. To determine whether these changes are clinically significant, we investigated ICP changes associated with HBBBD in 33 patients with malignant brain tumor utilizing flash VERs in which the N2 latency correlates well with ICP (N2 &jt; 80 ms linearly corresponds to ICP &jt; 20 cm H2O). VERs were obtained prior to, 4 and 24 h after 114 HBBBD/ chemotherapy procedures. Additionally, in 10 patients (37 HBBBDs), VER monitoring was performed during the procedure. In 112/150 (75%) HBBBDs, good barrier opening was obtained (radionuclide brain scan). Postoperative mean N2 latencies did not differ significantly from pre-HBBBD values (N2 = 86 ± 3.3 pre, 90 ± 3.0 / 4 h, 87 ± 3.6 / 24 h); there was no significant difference in N2 latencies in those patients with good vs poor BBBD. In the 10 patients monitored during HBBBD, peak N2 latency = 94.9 ± 1.6, however, was significantly above pre- and post-HBBBD values (p < 0.04). We conclude that flash VERs are a useful noninvasive measure of ICP, and that HBBBD is associated with mild transient increase in ICP which is not clinically detrimental.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burrows F A, Hillier S C, McLeod M E, Iron K S, Taylor M J (1990) Anterior fontanel pressure and visual evoked potentials in neonates and infants undergoing profound hypothermic circulatory-arrest. Anesthesiology 73: 632–636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Connolly M B, Jan J E, Cochrane D D (1991) Rapid recovery from cortical visual impairment following correction of prolonged shunt malfunction in congenital hydrocephalus. Arch Neurol 48: 956–957

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Coupland S G, Cochrane D D (1987) Visual evoked potentials, intracranial pressure and ventricular size in hydrocephalus. Doc Ophthalmol 66: 321–330

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gumerlock M K, Belshe B D, Madsen R, Watts C (1992) Osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption and chemotherapy in the treatment of high grade malignant glioma: patient series and literature review. J Neurooncol 12: 33–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Neuwelt E A, Frenkel E P, Rapoport S, et al (1980) Effect of osmotic blood-brain barrier disruption on methotrexate pharmacokinetics in the dog. Neurosurgery 7: 36–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. York D H, Pulliam M W, Rosenfeld J G, Watts C (1981) Relationship between visual evoked potentials and intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 55: 909–916

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. York D H, Leagan M, Benner S, Watts C (1984) Further studies with a noninvasive method of intracranial pressure estimation. Neurosurgery 14: 456–461

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zaaroor M, Pratt H, Feinsod M, Schacham S E (1993) Real-time monitoring of visual evoked potentials. Isr J Med Sei 29:17–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gumerlock, M.K., York, D., Durkis, D. (1994). Visual Evoked Responses as a Monitor of Intracranial Pressure During Hyperosmolar Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption. In: Ito, U., et al. Brain Edema IX. Acta Neurochirurgica, vol 60. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-9334-1_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-9334-1_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-9336-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-9334-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics