Skip to main content

Biomechanical determinants of reduction of the second ray in Lorisinae

  • Chapter
Hands of Primates

Abstract

Members of the subfamily Lorisinae are characterized by a reduced second ray. When walking on branches, lorises grip the support with the second ray pointing in the direction of movement. This does not contribute to the grip of either the hand or the foot. The finger is hyperextended at the metacarpophalangeal joint, flexed at the proximal interphalangeal joint, and hyperextended at the distal interphalangeal joint. As a result, the palmar (volar) pad proximal to the second finger and the distal pad of the digit are pressed against the underlying support. The toe is sometimes placed on top of the third digit. The morphological and behavioral features have a mechanical basis. The orientation of the second ray in combination with the great stride length characteristic of these animals generates high stress in bones and tendons. Its reduction in length as well as its flexed posture during locomotion are means to avoid over stressing. Moments in the basal joints of fingers and metacarpals that must be counterbalanced by muscle action are also reduced. In the larger-bodied lorisine species bending stresses are higher than in the smaller ones: the reduction of the second ray is therefore more pronounced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Biegert J., 1959. Die Ballen, Leisten, Furchen und Nägel von Hand und Fuß der Halbaffen. Z. Morph. Anthrop., 49: 316–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop A., 1964. Use of the hand in lower primates. In: J. Buettner-Janusch (ed.), Evolution and Genetic Biology of Primates, Academic Press, London: 133–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck C. & Bär, H., this vol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demes B., Jüngers W.L. & Nieschalk U., 1990. Size- and speed-related aspects of quadrupedal walking in slender and slow lorises. In: F.K. Jouffroy, H. Stack & C. Niemitz (eds.), Gravity in Primates, Il Sedicesimo, Florence, 175–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etter, H.U.F., 1978. Lorisiform hands and their phylogenetic implications: a preliminary report. In: D.J. Chivers & K.A. Joysey (eds.), Recent Advances in Primatology, Academic Press, London: 161–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebo D.L., 1985. The nature of the primate grasping foot. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 67: 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill W.C.O., 1953. Primates, vol. I. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouffroy F.K., 1989. Quantitative and experimental approaches to primate locomotion: A review of recent advances. In: R.K Seth & R. Seth (eds.), Perspectives in Primate Biology, Today and Tomorrow’s, New Dehli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouffroy F.K. & Lessertisseur J., 1976. Processus de réduction des doigts (main et pied) chez les primates. Modalités, implications génétiques. In: Coll. C.N.R.S. 266, Mécanismes de la rudimentation des organes: 381–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouffroy F.K., Godinot M. & Nakano Y., this vol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsmeer J.M.F., this vol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis O.J., 1985. Derived morphology of the wrist articulation and theories of hominoid evolution. Part I. The lorisine joints. J. Anat., 140: 447–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midlo C., 1934. Form of the hand and foot in primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop., 19: 337–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napier J.R. & Napier P.H., 1967. A Handbook of Living Primates. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preuschoft H., 1969. Statische Untersuchungen am Fuß der Primaten. I. Statik der Zehen und des Mittelfußes. Z. Anat. Entwickl. -Gesch., 129: 285–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preuschoft H., 1973. Functional anatomy of the upper extremity. In: G.H. Bourne (ed.): The Chimpanzee, vol. 6, Karger, Basel: 34–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preuschoft H., Godinot M., Beard C., Nieschalk U. & Jouffroy F.K., this vol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlins, this vol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus W.L., 1942. Rudimentary digits in primates. Quart. Rev. Biol., 17: 228–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker A., 1969. The locomotion of the lorises with special reference to the potto. East African Wildlife Journal, 7: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nieschalk, U., Demes, B. (1993). Biomechanical determinants of reduction of the second ray in Lorisinae. In: Preuschoft, H., Chivers, D.J. (eds) Hands of Primates. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6914-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6914-8_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-7434-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6914-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics