Skip to main content

A Niched-Penalty Approach for Constraint Handling in Genetic Algorithms

  • Conference paper
Artificial Neural Nets and Genetic Algorithms

Abstract

Most applications of genetic algorithms (GAs) in handling constraints use a straightforward penalty function method. Such techniques involve penalty parameters which must be set right in order for GAs to work. Although many researchers use adaptive variation of penalty parameters and penalty functions, the general conclusion is that these variations are specific to a problem and cannot be generalized. In this paper, we propose a niched-penalty approach which does not require any penalty parameter. The penalty function creates a selective pressure towards the feasible region and a niching maintains diversity among feasible solutions for the genetic recombination operator to find new feasible solutions. The approach is only ap plicable to population-based approaches, thereby giving GAs (or other evolutionary algorithms) a niche in exploiting this penalty-parameter-less penalty approach.Simulation results on a number of constrained optimization problems suggest the efficacy of the proposed method.

An Alexander von Humboldt Fellow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Deb, K.: Optimal design of a welded beam structure via genetic algorithms, AIAA Journal, vol. 29, no. 11, pp. 2013–2015,1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deb, K.: Optimization for engineering design: Algorithms and examples. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deb, K., Agrawal, R. B.: Simulated binary crossover for continuous search space. Complex Systems, vol. 9, pp. 115–148,1995.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Deb, K., Goldberg, D. E.: An investigation of niche and species formation in genetic function optimization, Proc. Third International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, Washington D. C, pp. 42–50, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deb, K., Goyal, M.: A combined genetic adaptive search (GeneAS) for engineering design, Computer Science and Informatics, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 30–45, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldberg, D. E., Deb, K., Clark, J. H.: Genetic algorithms, noise, and the sizing of populations, Complex Systems, vol. 6, pp. 333–362, 1992.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Harik, G., Cantu-Paz, E., Goldberg, D. E., Miller, B. L.: The gambler’s ruin problem, genetic algorithms, and the sizing of populations, Proc. 1997 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Orlando, FL, pp. 7–12, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Himmelblau, D. M.: Applied nonlinear programming, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Hock, W., Schittkowski, K.: Test examples for nonlinear programming code, Lecture Notes on Economics and Mathematical Systems, 187, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Homaifar, A., Lai, S. H.-Y., Qi., X.: Constrained optimization via genetic algorithms, Simulation, vol. 62, no. 4, 242–254, 1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Joines, J. A., Houck, C. R.: On the use of nonstation-ary penalty functions to solve nonlinear constrained optimization problems with GAs, Proc International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, Orlando, FL, pp. 579–584, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Michalewicz, Z.: Genetic algorithms, numerical optimization, and constraints, Proc. Sixth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, Carnegie-Mellon, PA, pp. 151–158,1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Michalewicz, Z., Attia, N.: Evolutionary optimization of constrained problems, Proc. Third Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming, pp. 98–108,1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Michalewicz, Z., Schoenauer, M.: Evolutionary algorithms for constrained parameter optimization problems, Evolutionary Computation, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–32, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Powell, D., Skolnick, M. M.: Using genetic algorithms in engineering design optimization with nonlinear constraints, Proc. Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, Urbana, IL, pp. 424–430,1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reklaitis, G. V, Ravindran, A., Ragsdell, K. M.: Engineering optimization methods and applications, New York: Wiley, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Richardson, J. T., Palmer, M. R., Liepins, G., Hilliard, M: Some guidelines for genetic algorithms with penalty functions, Proc. Third International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, Washington D. C, pp. 191–197,1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Deb, K., Agrawal, S. (1999). A Niched-Penalty Approach for Constraint Handling in Genetic Algorithms. In: Artificial Neural Nets and Genetic Algorithms. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6384-9_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6384-9_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-83364-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6384-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics