Skip to main content

Possibility Theory in Information Fusion

  • Chapter
Data Fusion and Perception

Part of the book series: International Centre for Mechanical Sciences ((CISM,volume 431))

Abstract

Possibility theory and the body of aggregation operations from fuzzy set theory provide some tools to address the problem of merging information coming from several sources. Possibility theory is a representation framework that can model various kinds of information items: numbers, intervals, consonant random sets, special kind of probability families, as well as linguistic information, and uncertain formulae in logical settings. The possibilistic approach to fusion is general enough to encompass logical modes of combination (conjunctive and disjunctive) as well as fusion modes used in statistics. The choice of a fusion mode depends on assumptions on whether all sources are reliable or not, and can be based on conflict analysis. This general framework allows to import inconsistency handling methods, inherited from logic, into numerical fusion problems. Quantified, prioritized and weighted fusion rules are described, as well as fusion under a priori knowledge. It is shown that the possibilistic setting is compatible with the Bayesian approach to fusion, the main difference being the presupposed existence, or not, of prior knowledge. The approach applies to sensor fusion, aggregation of expert opinions as well as the merging of databases especially in case of poor, qualitative information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abidi M.A. and Gonzalez R.C., eds. (1992) Data Fusion in Robotics and Machine Intelligence. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle T. D., Lange E., Iwamoto T., Otsu N. and Kyuma K. (1995). Fuzzy information fusion in a face regognition system, Int. J. Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-based Systems, 3, 217–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barat C., Kraus S., Minker J. and Subrahmanian (1992). Combining knowledge bases consisting in first order theories, Computational Intelligence, 8 (1), 45–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benferhat S., Dubois D. and Prade H. (1997). From semantic to syntactic approaches to information combination in possibilistic logic, Aggregation and Fusion of Imperfect Information (Bouchon-Meunier B., Ed.), Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 141–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benferhat S., Dubois D. and Prade H. (2000) An overview of possibilistic logic and its application to nonmonotonic reasoning and data fusion. In Della Riccia, G, Kruse R. Lenz, H., Eds, Computational Intelligence and Data Mining, CISM Courses and Lectures, vol. 408, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 69–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek J., Keller J., Krishnapuram R. and Pal N. R. (1999). Fuzzy Models and Algorithms for Pattern Recognition and Image Processing, The Handbooks of Fuzzy Sets Series, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek J. and Sutton M. A. (1999). Image processing in medicine, In Zimmermann H.-.J., Ed., Applications of Fuzzy Sets, The Handbooks of Fuzzy Sets Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch I., Sureda F., Petiot C. and Herment A. (1997). Fuzzy modelling and fuzzy mathematical morphology applied to 3D reconstruction of blood vessels by multimodality data fusion, In Dubois D., Prade H., Yager R., eds, Fuzzy Information Engineering, John Wiley, 93–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldrin L. and Sossai C. (1995). An algebraic semantics for possibilistic logic, Proc of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artifucial Intelligence, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 27–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchon-Meunier B., Ed. (1997). Aggregation and Fusion of Imperfect Information,PhysicaVerlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan B. G. and Shortliffe E. H. (1984). Rule-Based Expert Systems — The MYCIN Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project,Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke R. M. (1991). Experts in Uncertainty,Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cooman G., Aeyels D. (1999). Supremum-preserving upper probabilities. Information Sciences, 118, 173–212.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Delmotte F. and Borne P. (1998). Modeling of reliability with possibility theory, IEEE Trans. on Systems Man Cybern., A, 28, 78–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denoeux T. (2000) Modeling vague beliefs using fuzzy-valued belief structures, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 116, 167–200.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Deveughèle S. and Dubuisson B. (1993). Using possibility theory in perception: An application in artificial vision, Proc. of the Second IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, San Francisco, CA, March 28-April 1st, 821–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deveughèle S. and Dubuisson B. (1995). Adaptive aggregation: decomposing before combining, Proc. of the Fourth IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Yokohama, Japan, 1589–1596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. Fargier H. and Prade H. (2000) Multiple source information fusion: a practical inconsistency toleran approach. Proc. Eigth International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems, Vol. Il, 1047–1054

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Moral S. and Prade H. (1997). A semantics for possibility theory based on likelihoods, J. of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 205, 359–380.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D. and H. Prade. (1985). Evidence measures based on fuzzy information. Automatica 21 (5): 547–562.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1986). Weighted minimum and maximum operations in fuzzy set theory, Information Sciences, 39, 205–210.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1988a). Representation and combination of uncertainty with belief functions and possibility measures, Computational Intelligence., 4, 244–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1988b). Possibility Theory - An Approach to the Computerized Processing of Uncertainty, Plenum Press, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1988c). Default reasoning and possibility theory, Artificial Intelligence, 35, 243–257.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1989). Fuzzy sets, probability and measurement, Europ. J. of Operational Research, 40, 135–154.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1992a). Combination of fuzzy information in the framework of possibility theory, Data Fusion in Robotics and Machine Intelligence (Abidi M.A. and Gonzalez R.C., eds.), 481–505. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1992b). When upper probabilities are possibility measures, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 49, 65–74.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1992c). On the combination of evidence in various mathematical frameworks, In Flamm J. and Luisi T., eds., Reliability Data Collection and analysis Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 213–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D. and Prade H. (1994). Possibility theory and data fusion in poorly informed environments, Control Engineering Practice, 2 (5), 811–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H. and Sandri S. (1993). On possibility/probability transformations, In Lowen R. and Lowen M., eds., Fuzzy Logic: State of the Art, Kluwer Academic Publ., 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H. and Testemale C. (1988). Weighted fuzzy pattern matching, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 28, 313–331.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H. and Yager R. R. (1999). Merging fuzzy information, In Bezdek J.C., Dubois D., Prade H., Eds., Fuzzy Sets in Approximate Reasoning and Information Systems, The Handbooks of Fuzzy Sets Series, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 335–401.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards W. F. (1972). Likelihood, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fodor J. and Yager R. (2000). Fuzzy set-theoretic operators and quantifiers, In Fundamentals of Fuzzy Sets, Dubois D. and Prade H., eds., The Handbook of Fuzzy Sets Series, Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht, 125–193

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda T., Shimojida K., Fumihito A. and Matsuura H. (1993). Multisensor integration systems based on fuzzy inference and neural network, Information Sciences, 71, 27–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt J. and Kruse R. (1998). Parallel combination of information sources, In Dubois D. and Prade H., Eds, Belief Change, Vol. 3 in the Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 393–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann A. (1988). Theory of expertons and fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 28, 295–304.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kuncheva L. and Krishnapuram R. (1996). A fuzzy consensus operator, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 79, 347–356.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Lasserre V., Mauris G. and Foulloy L. (1998). A simple modelisation of measurement uncertainty: the truncated triangular possibility distribution, Proc Seventh International Conference. on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems, Paris, Editions Medicales et Scientifiques, 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehrer K, Wagner C.(1981) Rational Consensus in Science and Society,Reidel, Dordrecht. Lopez-Sanchez M., Lopez de Mantaras R. and Sierra C. Incremental map generation by low-cost robots based on possibility/necessity grids, Proc of the Thirteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence,Morgan Kaufmann, 351–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauris G., Benoit E. and Foulloy L. Fuzzy linguistic methods for the aggregation of complementary sensor information, In Bouchon-Meunier B., Ed., Aggregation and Fusion of Imperfect Information, Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 214–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mundici D. (1992). The logic of Ulam games with lies, Knowledge, In Bicchieri C., Dalla Chiara M., eds., Belief and Strategic Interaction, Cambridge Univ. Press, 275–284.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nifle A. and Reynaud R. (1997). Classification de comportements fondée sur l’occurrence d’événements en théorie des possibilités, Traitement du Signal, 14, 523–534.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pannerec T., Oussalah M., Maaref H. and Barret. C. (1998). Absolute localization of a miniature mobile robot using heterogeneous sensors: comparison between Kalman filter and possibility theory method, Proc. IEEE Symposium on Robotics and Cybernetics, CESA’98, Tunis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poloni M., Ulivi G. and Vendittelli M. (1995). Fuzzy logic and autonomous vehicles: Experiments in data fusion, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 69, 15–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole D. L. (1985). On the comparison of theories: preferring the most specific explanation, Proc. 9th Int. Joint Conf. on Artif. Int.lligence, Los Angeles, 465–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N., Manor R. (1970) On inference from inconsistent premises. Theory and Decision, 1, 179–219.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Roux L. and Desachy J. (1997). Multisources information fusion application for satellite image classification, In: Dubois D., Prade H. and Yager R.R., eds, Fuzzy Information Engineering., John Wiley, 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandri S., Dubois D. and Kalfsbeek H. (1995). Elicitation, assessment and pooling of expert judgement using possibility theory. IEEE Tranactions on Fuzzy Systems, 3, 313–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafer G. (1976). A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager R. R. (1984). Approximate reasoning as a basis for rule-based expert systems, IEEE Trans. On Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 14, 636–643.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R. R. (1985). Aggregating evidence using quantified statements, Information Sciences, 36, 179–206.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R. R. (1991). Non-monotonic set-theoretic operators, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 42, 173–190.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yager R. R. (1992). On the specificity of a possi-bility distribution, Fuzzy Sets and Systems., 50, 279–292.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yen J. (1992). Computing generalized belief functions for continuous fuzzy sets, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 6, 1–31.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets, Information Control, 8, 338–353.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L. A. (1978). Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, I, 3–28.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L.A. (1979). A theory of approximate reasoning, In J. Hayes J.E., Michie D. and Mikulich L.I., eds., Machine Intelligence, Vol. 9, Elsevier, New York, 149–194.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dubois, D., Prade, H. (2001). Possibility Theory in Information Fusion. In: Della Riccia, G., Lenz, HJ., Kruse, R. (eds) Data Fusion and Perception. International Centre for Mechanical Sciences, vol 431. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2580-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-2580-9_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-83683-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-2580-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics