Skip to main content

A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions

  • Chapter
Informationsstruktur und Grammatik

Part of the book series: Linguistische Berichte Sonderhefte ((LINGB,volume 4))

Abstract

The subject of this article is the semantics of focus, i.e. the development of a framework in which we can formulate the influence of focus on the semantic and pragmatic interpretation. In section (1), I will discuss such a framework, structured meanings. In section (2), I will point out some of its shortcomings, as it is currently worked out; they have to do with cases involving multiple foci. In (3), I develop a general representation format in which we can cope with these problematic cases. Finally, in (4) I will discuss some extensions and possible problems, among others a combined semantic treatment of focus and topic.

I had the opportunity to discuss issues of this article with several collegues. Without the comments and challenges of Paolo Casalegno, Gennaro Chierchia, Jochen Geilfuß, Joachim Jacobs, Michel Kefer, Uwe Mönnich, Richard Oehrle, Manfred Pinkal, Arnim von Stechow, Hubert Truckenbrodt, Dietmar Zaefferer, and Ede Zimmermann, flaws would be more abundant, and the coverage would be less broad. Thanks to them all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Chomsky, N. (1977): “On Wh-Movement”. In: Formal Syntax, ed. by P.W. Culicover, T. Wasow, & A. Akmajian. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Ö. (1974): “Topic-comment structure revisited”. In: Topic and comment, contextual boundedness and focus, ed. by Ö. Dahl. Hamburg: Buske Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, D. (1987): “Type raising, functional composition, and non-constituent conjunction”. In: Categorial Grammar and Natural Language Structures, ed. by R. Oerle, E. Bach, & D. Wheeler. Dordrecht: Reidel, 153–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L.A. (1969): “A presuppositional analysis of only and even”. In: CLS 5, Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 98–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1972): Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1983): Fokus und Skalen, Zur Syntax und Semantik von Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1984): “Funktionale Satzperspektive und Illokutionssemantik”. Linguistische Berichte 91, 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1986): “The Syntax of Focus and Adverbials in German”. In: Topic, focus and configurationality, ed. by W. Abraham & S.D. Meij. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1988): “Fokus-Hintergrund-Gliederung und Grammatik”. In: Intonationsforschungen, ed. by H. Altmann. Linguistische Arbeiten. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 89–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (to appear): “Focus ambiguities”. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Focus and Intonation, Fraunhofer Institut Stuttgart, ed. by J. Hoepelman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karttunen, L. & S. Peters (1979): “Conventional Implicature”. In: Syntax and Semantics 11: Presuppositions, ed. by Ch.-K. Oh & D.A. Dinneen. New York: Academic Press, 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, P. (1990): “Even”. Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 59–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kefer, M. (1989): Satzgliedstellung und Satzstruktur im Deutschen. Tübingen: Nan. Kiss, K.E. ( 1986 ): Configurationality in Hungarian. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, W. & A. von Stechow (1982): Intonation und Bedeutung von Fokus. Arbeitspapier des SFB 99, No. 77. Konstanz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A. (1989): “The representation of focus”. Manuscript. Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M. (1990): “Polarity phenomena and alternative semantics”. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Amsterdam Colloquium, ed. by M. Stokhof & L. Torenvliet. Amsterdam: Institute for Language, Logic and Information, Universiteit van Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krifka, M. (to appear): “Focus and the Interpretation of Generic Sentences”. In: The Generic Book, ed. by G. Carlson & R Pelletier. Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, D. (1980): The Structure of Intonational Meaning: Evidence from English. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J.-Y. & T.E. Zimmermann (1983): “Presupposition and quantifiers”. In: Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language, ed. by R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 290–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D (1979): “Scorekeeping in a language game”. Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 339–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, G. (1983): “The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms”. In: Meaning, Use and the Interpretation of Language, ed. by R. Bäuerle et al. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lötscher, A. (1983): Satzakzent und funktionale Satzperspektive im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lujan, M. (1986): “Stress and bindings of pronouns”. Chicago Linguistics Society Meeting 22, Vol. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, D. & G. Hirst (1990): “A Compositional Semantics for Focusing Subjuncts”. In: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, 54–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochemont, M.S. (1986): Focus in Generative Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, M.E. (1985): Association with Focus. Ph.D.-Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, M.E. (1988): “Restrictive Quantificational Adverbials with Focus Semantics”. Talk presented at the Tübingen Conference on Genericity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sag, I.A. (1977): Deletion and Logical Form. IULC, Bloomington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selkirk, E.O. (1984): Phonology and Syntax. The Relation between Sound and Structure. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R. (1979): “Assertion”. In: Syntax and Semantics 9–Pragmatics, ed. by P. Cole. New York: Academic Press, 315–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stechow, A. v. (1989): Focusing and backgrounding operators. Universität Konstanz, Fachgruppe Sprachwissenschaft, Arbeitspapier Nr. 6. Konstanz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stechow, A. v & S. Uhmann (1986): “Some remarks on focus projection”. In: Topic, Focus and Cofigurationality, ed. by W. Abraham & S. de Meij. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steedman, M. (1985): “Dependency and coordination in the grammar of Dutch and English”. Language 61, 523–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taglicht, J. (1984): Message and Emphasis. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truckenbrodt, H. (1988): “Zur Syntax der Koordination”. SNS-Bericht 88–41. Seminar fur natürlich-sprachliche Systeme, Universität Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. (1980): “Remarks on stress and anaphora”. Journal of Linguistic Research 1, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krifka, M. (1992). A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions. In: Jacobs, J. (eds) Informationsstruktur und Grammatik. Linguistische Berichte Sonderhefte, vol 4. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-12176-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-12176-3_2

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-12294-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-663-12176-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics