Skip to main content

Computational Design for Scaffold Tissue Engineering

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biomaterials for Implants and Scaffolds

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Biomaterials Science and Engineering ((SSBSE,volume 8))

Abstract

Structure of tissue scaffold plays a critical role in guiding and supporting cell proliferation and differentiation. One widely accepted way to create a desirable biomechanical environment is to have it match the mechanical and biological properties of native host tissue. However, conventional design process typically involves laborious trial and error, and it is sometimes very difficult to achieve the desired biomimeticity when multiple criteria are involved. This chapter aims to present a systematic methodology for the design of tissue scaffold structures, in which the stiffness and diffusivity criteria are taken into account to address various biomechanical requirements in tissue engineering. The scaffolds with periodic microstructures are considered herein, which can be fabricated using 3D printing or additive manufacturing technologies. In this design process, the finite element (FE)-based homogenisation technique is employed to characterise effective material properties, and topology optimisation is carried out using the inverse homogenisation technique, in which (1) bulk modulus, (2) diffusivity and (3) their combination are formulated as the design objectives. To assess the optimised design, we simulate and examine the bone tissue regeneration inside the scaffolds under certain biomechanical conditions in two different models, specifically Wolff’s remodelling and the mechanobiology rules. The tissue regeneration results demonstrate how different design criteria lead to different outcomes, signifying the importance of scaffold design and the proposed methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langer R, Vacanti JP (1993) Tissue engineering. Science 260(5110):920–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin CY, Kikuchi N, Hollister SJ (2004) A novel method for biomaterial scaffold internal architecture design to match bone elastic properties with desired porosity. J Biomech 37(5):623–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hollister SJ (2005) Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 4(7):518–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin CY et al (2005) Functional bone engineering using ex vivo gene therapy and topology-optimized, biodegradable polymer composite scaffolds. Tissue Eng 11(9–10):1589–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hollister SJ, Maddoxa RD, Taboas JM (2002) Optimal design and fabrication of scaffolds. Biomaterials 23:4095–4103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen Y, Zhou S, Li Q (2011) Microstructure design of biodegradable scaffold and its effect on tissue regeneration. Biomaterials 32(22):5003–5014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Adachi T et al (2006) Framework for optimal design of porous scaffold microstructure by computational simulation of bone regeneration. Biomaterials 27(21):3964–3972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. MacArthur BD, Oreffo ROC (2005) Bridging the gap. Nature 433(7021):19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanz-Herrera JA, Garcia-Aznar JM, Doblare M (2009) On scaffold designing for bone regeneration: a computational multiscale approach. ACTA Biomater 5:219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun W et al (2004) Computer-aided tissue engineering: application to biomimetic modelling and design of tissue scaffolds. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 39(1):49–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun W et al (2005) Bio-CAD modeling and its applications in computer-aided tissue engineering. Comput Aided Des 37:1097–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Marga F et al (2012) Toward engineering functional organ modules by additive manufacturing. Biofabrication 4(2):12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Williams JM et al (2005) Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. Biomaterials 26(23):4817–4827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hollister SJ (2009) Scaffold design and manufacturing: from concept to clinic. Adv Mater 21(32–33):3330–3342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fang Z, Starly B, Sun W (2005) Computer-aided characterization for effective mechanical properties of porous tissue scaffolds. CAD Comput Aid Des 31:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sturm S et al (2010) On stiffness of scaffolds for bone tissue engineering—a numerical study. J Biomech 43(9):1738–1744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Byrne DP et al (2007) Simulation of tissue differentiation in a scaffold as a function of porosity, Young’s modulus and dissolution rate: application of mechanobiological models in tissue engineering. Biomaterials 28:5544–5554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen Y, Zhou S, Li Q (2011) Mathematical modeling of degradation for bulk-erosive polymers: applications in tissue engineering scaffolds and drug delivery systems. Acta Biomater 7(3):1140–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Huiskes R et al (2000) Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone. Nature 405(6787):704–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun W et al (2004) Computer-aided tissue engineering: overview, scope and challenges. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 39:29–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cadman JE et al (2013) On design of multi-functional microstructural materials. J Mater Sci 48(1):51–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bensoussan A, Papanicolaou G, Lions JL (1978) Asymptotic analysis for periodic structures, vol 5, Studies in mathematics and its applications. North Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam. xxiv, 700 23 cm

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sanchez-Palencia E (1980) Non-homogeneous media and vibration theory. Lecture Notes in Physics. Vol 127. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  24. Guedes JM, Kikuchi N (1990) Preprocessing and postprocessing for materials based on the homogenization method with adaptive finite element methods. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 83:143–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hassani B, Hinton E (1998) A review of homogenization and topology optimization I – homogenization theory for media with periodic structure. Comput Struct 69(6):707–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bendsoe MP, Sigmund O (2013) Topology optimization: theory, methods, and applications. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  27. Silva ECN, Fonseca JSO, Kikuchi N (1998) Optimal design of periodic piezocomposites. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 159(1-2):49–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sigmund O (1994) Design of material structures using topology optimisation. Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sigmund O (1994) Tailoring materials for specific needs. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 5(6):736–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Catledge SA et al (2007) An electrospun triphasic nanofibrous scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Biomed Mater 2:142–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Aubert G, Kornprobst P (2006) Mathematical problems in image processing:partial differential equations and the calculus of variations. 2nd edn. Springer, New York, xxxi:377

    Google Scholar 

  32. Wang MY, Zhou S, Ding H (2004) Nonlinear diffusions in topology optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 28(4):262–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Svanberg K (1987) The method of moving asymptotes – a new method for structural optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24(2):359–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Malda J et al (2004) Oxygen gradients in tissue – engineered Pegt/Pbt cartilaginous constructs: measurement and modeling. Biotechnol Bioeng 86(1):9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Steven G, Li Q, Xie Y (2000) Evolutionary topology and shape design for general physical field problems. Comput Mech 26(2):129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhou S et al (2012) Design and fabrication of biphasic cellular materials with transport properties–a modified bidirectional evolutionary structural optimization procedure and MATLAB program. Int J Heat Mass Transf 55(25):8149–8162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kang H, Lin C-Y, Hollister SJ (2010) Topology optimization of three dimensional tissue engineering scaffold architectures for prescribed bulk modulus and diffusivity. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42(4):633–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Guest JK, Prevost JH (2006) Optimizing multifunctional materials: design of microstructures for maximized stiffness and fluid permeability. Int J Solids Struct 43(22-23):7028–7047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. de Kruijf N et al (2007) Topological design of structures and composite materials with multiobjectives. Int J Solids Struct 44(22):7092–7109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen Y, Zhou S, Li Q (2009) Computational design for multifunctional microstructural composites. Int J Mod Phys B 23(06n07):1345–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen Y, Zhou S, Li Q (2010) Multiobjective topology optimization for finite periodic structures. Comput Struct 88(11):806–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hollister SJ, Lin CY (2007) Computational design of tissue engineering scaffolds. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(31–32):2991–2998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Parfitt AM (1994) Osteonal and hemi-osteonal remodeling – the spatial and temporal framework for signal traffic in adult human bone. J Cell Biochem 55(3):273–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Carter DR (1984) Mechanical loading histories and cortical bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int 36:S19–S24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Huiskes R et al (1987) Adaptive bone-remodeling theory applied to prosthetic-design analysis. J Biomech 20(11–12):1135–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rice JC, Cowin SC, Bowman JA (1988) On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J Biomech 21(2):155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Beaupré GS, Orr TE, Carter DR (1990) An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling – theoretical development. J Orthop Res 8:651–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Prendergast PJ, Huiskes R, Soballe K (1997) Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces. J Biomech 30(6):539–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Guest JK, Prevost JH (2007) Design of maximum permeability material structures. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196(4–6):1006–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhou S, Li Q (2008) Computational design of multi-phase microstructural materials for extremal conductivity. Comput Mater Sci 43(3):549–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The financial supports from the Australian Research Council through the Future Fellowship and Discovery Scheme are greatly appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qing Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chang, CC., Chen, Y., Zhou, S., Mai, YW., Li, Q. (2017). Computational Design for Scaffold Tissue Engineering. In: Li, Q., Mai, YW. (eds) Biomaterials for Implants and Scaffolds. Springer Series in Biomaterials Science and Engineering, vol 8. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53574-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics