Skip to main content

Common-Knowledge and KP-Model

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Information and Database Systems (ACIIDS 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9621))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2269 Accesses

Abstract

This paper starts epistemic approaches of studying the Bayesian routing problem in the frame work of the network game introduced by Koutsoupias and Papadimitriou [LNCS 1563, pp.404–413. Springer (1999)]. It highlights the role of common-knowledge on the users’ individual conjectures on the others’ selections of channels in the network game. Especially two notions of equilibria are presented in the Bayesian extension of the network game; expected delay equilibrium and rational expectations equilibrium, such as each user minimizes own expectations of delay and social cost respectively. We show that the equilibria have the properties: If all users commonly know them, then the former equilibrium yields a Nash equilibrium in the based KP-model and the latter equilibrium yields a Nash equilibrium for social cost in the network game.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mazalov [9], Chap. 9 pp.314–351.

  2. 2.

    Example 9.6 in Mazalov [9] p. 324.

  3. 3.

    Where \([\mathbf{l}_i = l]\) is defined by \([\mathbf{l}_i = l] = \{ \omega \in \varOmega \vert \mathbf{l}_i(\omega ) = l \}\). The last postulate BP means that ‘user i knows absolutely his/her selection of channel l.

  4. 4.

    This is called the event-based approach in Fagin et al. [4].

  5. 5.

    According to these properties we can say the structure \(\langle \varOmega , (K_{i})_{i \in N}\rangle \) is a model for the multi-modal logic S5n.

References

  1. Aumann, R.J.: Agreeing to disagree. Ann. Stat. 4, 1236–1239 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Aumann, R.J.: Subjectivity and correlation in randomized strategies. J. Math. Econ. 1, 67–96 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Aumann, R.J., Brandenburger, A.: Epistemic conditions for mixed strategy Nash equilibrium. Econometrica 42, 1161–1180 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.Y.: Reasoning About Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Garing, M., Monien, B., Tiemann, K.: Selfish routing with incomplete information. Theor. Compt. Syst. 42, 91–130 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Harsanyi, J.C.: Games with incomplete information played by Bayesian players, I, II, III. Manag. Sci. 14, 159–182, 320–332, 468–502 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koutsoupias, E., Papadimitriou, C.: Worst-case equilibria. In: Meinel, C., Tison, S. (eds.) STACS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1563, p. 404. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsuhisa, T.: Selfish Routing with Common-knowledge. Working paper (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mazalov, V.: Mathematical Game Theory and Applications. Wiley (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nash, J.F.: Equilibrium points in \(n\)-person games. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. Am. 36, 48–49 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Parikh, R., Krasucki, P.: Communication, consensus, and knowledge. J. Econ. Theor. 52, 78–89 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takashi Matsuhisa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Matsuhisa, T. (2016). Common-Knowledge and KP-Model. In: Nguyen, N.T., Trawiński, B., Fujita, H., Hong, TP. (eds) Intelligent Information and Database Systems. ACIIDS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9621. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49381-6_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49381-6_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49380-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49381-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics