Skip to main content

Environmental Taxes and Standards: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact on Innovation

  • Conference paper
Innovation-Oriented Environmental Regulation

Part of the book series: ZEW Economic Studies ((ZEW,volume 10))

Abstract

By shaping the external framework conditions for companies, the state is an essential determinant of the extent and direction of company innovation. Since the beginning of the 1970s, environmental policy instruments have been implemented in many countries, thereby exerting a considerable influence on the behaviour of companies with respect to the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adler, U., E.-M. Bauer, N. Heller and J. Wackerbauer (1994), Additiver und integrierter Umweltschutz und dessen Bedeutung im internationalen Wettbewerb. Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashford, N. (1993), Understanding Technological Responses of Industrial Firms to Environmental Problems: Implications for Government Policy, in: Fischer, K. and J. Schot (eds.), Environmental Strategies for Industry, Washington, 277–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blazejczak, J. and D. Edler (1999), Innovationsfreundlicher Politikmuster — ein internationaler Vergleich am Beispiel der Papierindustrie, in: Klemmer, P. (ed.), Innovationen und Umwelt, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, G., J. Hemmelskamp, W. Weibert and H. Wolff (1993), Ansatzpunkte fuer eine Verbesserung der Standortbedingungen fuer Forschung, Entwicklung und Technologie in der Bundesrepublik Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brännlund, R., R. Färe and S. Grosskopf (1995), Environmental Regulation and Profitability: An Application to Swedish Pulp and Paper Mills, Environmental and Resource Economics 6, 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottica, A. (1994), The microeconomics of environmental innovation in the European packaging industry. Paper at the 5th Conference of the European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felder, J., D. Harhoff, G. Licht, E. Nerlinger and H. Stahl (1994), Innovationsverhalten der deutschen Wirtschaft. Ergebnisse der Innovationserhebung 1993, Dokumentation 9401, Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georg, S., I. Ropke and U. Jorgensen (1992), Clean Technology — Innovation and Environmental Regulation, Environmental and Resource Economics 2, 533–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, K., A. McMeekin and A. Irwin (1994), Technological Trajectories and RandD for Environmental Innovation in UK Firms, Futures 26 (10), 1047–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halstrick-Schwenk, M., L. Horbach, K. Löbbe and J. Walter (1994), Die Umwelttechnische Industrie in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Periodical No. 12, Rhine-Westphalia Institute for Economic Research (RWI), Essen

    Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., and G. Licht (1994), Das Mannheimer Innovationspanel, in: Hochmuth, U. and J. Wagner (eds.), Firmenpanelstudien in Deutschland, Tübingen, 255–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., G. Licht, et al. (1996), Innovationsaktivitäten kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmen. Ergebnisse des Mannheimer Innovationspanels. Publication Series of the Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), No. 8. Baden-Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmelskamp, J. (1997), Environmental Policy Instruments and their Effects on Innovation, European Planning Studies 2, 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmelskamp, J. (1999), Umweltpolitik und technischer Fortschritt,Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jänicke, M. (1997), Umweltinnovationen aus der Sicht der Policy-Analyse: vom instrumentellen zum strategischen Ansatz der Umweltpolitik. FFU-rep 97–3. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A.B. and K. Palmer (1996), Environmental Regulation and Innovation: A Panel Data Study, Working Paper 5545, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge (MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R. (1996), Environmental Policy and Technical Change: A Comparison of the Technological Impact of Policy Instruments, Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R. (1998), Environmental Regulation and Innovation Key Issues and Questions for Research, in Hemmelskamp, J. and F. Leone (eds.), The Impact of EU-Regulation on Innovation of European Industry, Technical Report EUR 18111 EN. Seville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinknecht, A. (1989), Firm Size and Innovation. Observations in Dutch Manufacturing Industries. Small Business Economics 1, 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanjouw, J.O. and A. Mody (1995), Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology, Research Policy 25, 549–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leone, F., J. Hemmelskamp, C. Pompa, D. Bradford, A. Zanfei, H. Valve and B. Elling (1999), Integrated Appraisal Methodology — Guidline for Environmental Integration of DG Entreprise Projects and Policies, Project Report. European Commission, JRCInstitute for Prospective Technological Studies. Sevilla.

    Google Scholar 

  • MIP (1993), Mannheimer Innovationspanel. Daten der ersten Welle aus dem Jahre 1993, Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milliman, S.R. and R. Prince (1989), Firm Incentives to promote Technological Change in Pollution Control, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 17, 247–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1984), Sectoral Patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory, Research Policy 13, 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. and Claas van der Linde (1995), Towards a new Conception of the Environ- ment-Competitiveness Relationship, Journal of Economic Perspectives 9, 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R. (1992), Industrial innovation and government environmental regulation: Some lessons from the past, Technovation 12 (7), 447–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, G. (1995), Folgen ökologisch motivierter Energiesteuern, in Hohmeyer, O. (ed.), Ökologische Steuerreform, Wirtschaftsanalysen, No. 1, Baden-Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walz, R., E. Gruber, H. Hiessl and T. Reiß (1992), Neue Technologien und Ressourcenschonung, Abschlußbericht des FhG-ISI an das BMFT, Karlsruhe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, V., W. Turner, and P. Stoneman (1995), Marketing Strategies and Market Prospects for Environmentally Friendly Consumer Products. Coventry: Warwick Business School.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hemmelskamp, J. (2000). Environmental Taxes and Standards: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact on Innovation. In: Hemmelskamp, J., Rennings, K., Leone, F. (eds) Innovation-Oriented Environmental Regulation. ZEW Economic Studies, vol 10. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12069-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12069-9_15

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1313-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-12069-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics