Skip to main content

Modeling Spatial Objects Affected by Uncertainty

  • Chapter
Spatio-Temporal Databases

Abstract

The treatment of uncertainty in spatial data is a problem that has been studied from a theoretical point of view (notably, [1]). The various models have never been developed in enough depth to become operational and, till now, the management of uncertainty in current spatial database systems is not supported. The main problem about spatial objects that are stored in spatial databases is that it is impossible to reason about the degree of indetermination of a result, since the data have lost the information about all the uncertainty that added up after having undertaken several transformations. An adequate modeling of geometric uncertainty in spatial data is essential for the assessment of data quality, and, consequently, for helping any process related to dataset acquisition and integration [12, 13, 17].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Burrough P.A., Frank A.U. (Eds.) (1996) Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries. GISDATA Series, Taylor & Francis, London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clementini E. (2002) A model for lines with a broad boundary. In: Proc. of the 9th International Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems (IPMU 2002), Annecy, France.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Clementini E., Di Felice P. (1996) An Algebraic Model for Spatial Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries. In: Burrough P.A., Frank A.U. (Eds.) Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clementini E., Di Felice P. (1996) A Model for Representing Topological Relationships Between Complex Geometric Features in Spatial Databases. Information Sciences 90(1–4):121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clementini E., Di Felice P. (1997) Approximate Topological Relations. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 16:173–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clementini E., Di Felice P. (2001) A spatial model for complex objects with a broad boundary supporting queries on uncertain data. Data & Knowledge Engineering 37(3):285–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clementini E., Di Felice P., van Oosterom P. (1993) A Small Set of Formal Topological Relationships Suitable for End-User Interaction. In: Abel D., Ooi B.C. (Eds.) Advances in Spatial Databases Third International Symposium, SSD ′93, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 277–295.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Cohn A.G. (1995) The challenge of qualitative spatial reasoning. Computing Surveys 27(3):323–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohn A.G., Gotts N.M. (1996) The `Egg-Yolk’ Representation of Regions with Indeterminate Boundaries. In: Burrough P.A., Frank A.U. (Eds.) Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 171–187.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Egenhofer M.J., Herring J.R. (1991) Categorizing Binary Topological Relationships Between Regions, Lines, and Points in Geographic Databases. Department of Surveying Engineering, University of Maine, Orono, ME.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Erwig M., Schneider M. (1997) Vague regions. In: Scholl M., Voisard A. (Eds.) Advances in Spatial Databases Fifth International Symposium, SSD ′97, Springer, Berlin, pp. 298–320.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Frank A.U. (1998) Metamodels for Data Quality Description. In: Jeansoulin R., Goodchild M. (Eds.) Data Quality in Geographic Information From Error to Uncertainty, Editions Hermès, Paris, pp. 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guptill S., Morrison J. (Eds.) (1995) Elements of spatial data quality. Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  14. OpenGIS Consortium (1998) Open GIS Simple Features Specification for SQL.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Russell B. (1923) Vagueness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy and Psychology 1:84–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schneider M. (1996) Modelling spatial objects with undetermined boundaries using the Realm/ROSE approach. In: Burrough P.A., Frank A.U. (Eds.) Geographic Objects with Indeterminate Boundaries, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Worboys M., Clementini E. (2001) Integration of imperfect spatial information. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing 12(1):61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clementini, E. (2004). Modeling Spatial Objects Affected by Uncertainty. In: de Caluwe, R., de Tré, G., Bordogna, G. (eds) Spatio-Temporal Databases. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09968-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-09968-1_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-06070-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-09968-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics