Abstract
As Michael Goodchild reminds us1, the Seventeenth-Century geographer, Bernard Varenius, produced a treatise focused on two views of geography. One, clearly related to the work of Newton, covered general geography (dealing with a general set of principles) and the other dealt with ideographic geography (having to do with the special character of places). Varenius’ (1650) two-fold approach affirms what our society has forgotten, but what is in agreement with Newton himself: we need to conceive of — there is — both absolute and relative space. The former is assumed by physicists in the course of their abstractions and the latter is experienced by ordinary people in the course of making their way in the world. However, today, the powerful realm of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), for all its potential for human understanding and good, does substantial violence by requiring that all our transactions and uses translate (radically convert) our experiential realms into the coded terms of GIS as based on data provided and available only in Euclidean geometrical terms for Newtonian space.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aberley, D., et al. 1993. Boundaries of Home: Mapping for Local Empowerment. Gabriola Island BC. and Philadelphia PA: New Society Publishers.
Aberley, D. and Lewis, G.M. 1998. Cartographic Encounters: Perspectives on Native American Mapmaking and Map Use. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Albrecht, J. and Lim, G-C. 1986. A search for alternative planning theory: Use of critical theory. Journal of Architecture-Planning Research 3:117–31.
Arnheim,. 1986. Dynamics of Architectural Form. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Blackburn, R. 1989. Defending the myths: The ideology of bourgeois social science. In Cockburn, A. and Blackburn, R. (eds.) A Brief Guide to Bourgeois Ideology in Student Power. New Left Review, 154–69.
Bravo, M.T. 1996. The accuracy of ethnoscience: A study of Inuit cartography and cross-cultural commensurability. Manchester Papers in Social Anthropology, no. 2. Manchester: Department of Social Anthropology, University of Manchester, 1–36.
Brody, H. 1988. Maps and Dreams. Vancouver: Douglas and Mclntyrex.
Brody, H. 1989. Maps and journeys. In Macleod, F. (ed.) Togail Tir Marking Time: The Map of the Western Isles. Stornoway, Scotland: Aeair Ltd. and Lanntair Gallery, 133–36
Castells, M., Mollenkkopf, R., and Robson, M. 1998. The Rise of the Network Society. Paper presented at Telecommunications and the City Conference, University of Georgia (March).
Chatwin, B. 1987. The Songlines. New York: Penguin.
Collins, D. 1977. Paulo Freire: His Life, Works, and Thought. New York: Paulist Press.
D’Amico, R. 1989. Historicism and Knowledge. New York: Routledge.
Davidoff, P. and Reiner, T.A. 1962. A choice theory of planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 28(May): 11–39.
Davidoff, P. 1965. Advocacy and pluralism in planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 31(November):277–96.
Dunne, J.S. 1967. A Search for God in Time and Memory. New York: Macmillan Company.
Feenberg, A. and Hannay, A. 1995. Technology and the Politics of Knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Forester, J. 1980. Critical theory and planning practice. Journal of the American Planning Association 46:(July) 91–112.
Forester, J. 1982. Planning in the face of power. APA Journal Winter: 67–80.
Forsher, J. 1998. Access and exclusion in the age of information and communication technology. Paper presented at Telecommunications and the City Conference, University of Georgia (March).
Freire, P. 1968. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.
Freire, P. 1973. Education for Critical Consciousness. New York: Seabury Press.
Gadamer, H-G. 1989. Truth and Method. New York: Continuum.
Gould, P. and White, R. 1980. Mental Mapping. London: Little, Unwin.
Habermas, J. 1984, 1987. Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon.
Heelan P. 1983. Space Perception and the Philosophy of Science. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Heidegger, M. 1966. Discourse on Thinking. New York: Harper & Row.
Heidegger, M.1977. The Question Concerning Technology. New York: Harper & Row
Hisatake, T. 1986. Indigenous maps, cosmology, and spatial recognition of the North American Indians: With special reference to the Ojibway around Lake Superior, In Nozawa, Hideki (ed.) Cosmology, Epistemology, and the History of Geography: Japanese Contributions to the History of Geography. Fukuoka: Institute of Geography, Kyushu University, 3:1–25.
Investor’s Business Daily. 1998. Does U.S. face a ‘Digital Divide’?, August 14:Bl-2.
Lankshear, C, Paters, M., and Knobel, M. 1996. Critical pedagogy and cyberspace. In Giroux, H.A., et al. Counter narratives: Cultural Studies and Critical Pedagogies in Postmodern Spaces. New York: Routledge, 149–88.
Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. New York: Blackwell.
Loader, B. (ed.) 1998. Cyberspace Divide: Equality, Agency and Policy. New York: Routledge.
Maclntyre, A. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Mazzioti, D.F. 1974. The underlying assumptions of advocacy planning: pluralism and reform. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 40(l):207–25.
Merleau-Ponty, M. 1979. Phenomenology of Perception. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
Moodie D.W. 1994. The role of the Indian in the European exploration and mapping of Canada. Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft fur Kanada-Studien 14(2):79–94.
Mugerauer, R. 1991. Post-structuralist planning theory. Austin: University of Texas Graduate Program in Community and Regional Planning Working Papers.
Mugerauer, R. 1995. Environmental Interpretations: Tradition, Deconstruction, Hermeneu-tics. Austin: University of Texas Press.
NTIA (National Telecommunications and Information Administration). 1997. Falling Through the Net II: New Data on the Digital Divide, A Survey of Information ‘Haves’ and ‘Have Nots’ in 1997. See http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/net2/falling.html.
Putnam, C. 1978. Adult Literacy Education: Paulo Freire’s Ideas and a Program for the United States. Unpublished manuscript, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Rundstrom, R.A. 1995. GIS, Indigenous peoples, and epistemological diversity. Cartography and Geographical Information Systems 22(1):63–75.
Sanyal, R. 1996. Report of a colloquium held at department of urban planning, Cambridge: MIT.
Schiller, H.I. 1996. Information Technology: The Deepening Social Crisis in America.
Thiis-Evensen, T. 1984. Archetypes in Architecture. Oslo: Norwegian University Press.
Turnbull, D. 1989. Maps Are Territories: Science is an Atlas. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University.
Varenius, B. 1650. Geographia Generalis. Amsterdam: Apud Ludovicum Elzervirium.
Warhus, M. 1977. Another America: Native American Maps and the History of Our Land. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Woodward, D. and Lewis, G.M. (eds.) 1998. Cartography in the Traditional African, American, Arctic, Australian, and Pacific Societies, vol. 2, bk. 3 of The History of Cartography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mugerauer, R. (2000). Qualitative GIS: To Mediate, Not Dominate. In: Janelle, D.G., Hodge, D.C. (eds) Information, Place, and Cyberspace. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04027-0_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04027-0_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08692-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-04027-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive