Skip to main content

The Blunt Body Paradox — A Case for Transient Growth

  • Conference paper
Laminar-Turbulent Transition

Part of the book series: IUTAM Symposia ((IUTAM))

Abstract

The ‘blunt body paradox’ refers to the early transition on spherical forebodies (even those that are highly polished) observed at supersonic and hypersonic freestream speeds both in flight and in wind tunnels. This transition occurs usually in the subsonic portion of the flow behind the bow shock wave (see for example Buglia 1961), a region of highly favorable pressure gradient that is stable to T-S waves. Surface cooling leads to even earlier transition. This phenomenon, identified in the mid-1950’s, has defied clear explanation. It has always been prominent on Morkovin’s list of unsolved problems. The tentative suggestions are generally roughness related since stagnation point boundary layers are very thin. But no connection has been made between the microscopic roughness on the surface and the features of the observed early transition such as location, sensitivity to surface temperature level, etc. This has led the present authors to seek an explanation through transient growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashpis, D. and Reshotko, E. (1990) J. Fluid Mech, 218, 513–547.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Buglia, James J. (1961) NASA TN D-955, September 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Butler, K.M. and Farrell, B.F. (1992) Phys. Fluids, A4, 1637–1650.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dunlap, R. and Kuethe, A.M. (1962) J. Aerospace Sciences, 29, 1454–1461.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Hanifi, A., Schmid, P.J. and Henningson, D.S. (1996) Phys. Fluids, 8, 826–837.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Landahl, M.T. (1980) J. Fluid Mech. 98, 243–251.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Mack, L.M. (1969) JPL Report 900–277 Rev. A.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mayer, E.W. and Reshotko, E. (1997) Phys. Fluids, 9, 242–244.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Malik, M.R. (1990) J. Comp. Physics, 86, 376–413.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Schmid, P.J. and Henningson, D.S. (1994) J. Fluid Mech., 277, 197–225.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Reshotko, E., Tumin, A. (2000). The Blunt Body Paradox — A Case for Transient Growth. In: Fasel, H.F., Saric, W.S. (eds) Laminar-Turbulent Transition. IUTAM Symposia. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03997-7_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03997-7_60

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08752-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03997-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics