Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants ((FAMILIES GENERA,volume 2))

Abstract

Annual or perennial herbs, subshrubs or shrubs, rarely lianes or trees. Leaves simple, alternate or opposite, exstipulate, entire or almost so. Inflorescence a dense head, loose or spike-like thyrse, spike, raceme or panicle, basically cymose, bracteate; bracts hyaline, membranous, white or coloured, subtending one or more flowers. Flowers hermaphrodite or unisexual (plants dioecious, polygamous or monoecious), mostly actinomorphic, usually bibracteolate, often in ultimate 3-flowered cymules; lateral flowers of such cymules sometimes sterile, being modified into scales, straight or hooked spines, bristles or hairs. Perianth uniseriate, membranous to firm and finally indurate, usually falling with the ripe fruit included, with or without the bracteoles. Tepals (0-1)-3-5, free or somewhat fused below, glabrous to ± pilose or lanate, green to white or variously coloured. Stamens as many as and opposite the tepals, rarely fewer or more; filaments free or commonly fused into a cup at the base, sometimes almost completely fused and 5-toothed at the apex with entire or deeply lobed teeth, some occasionally anantherous, sometimes alternating with variously shaped pseudostaminodes2; anthers 1-2-locular (i.e., dehiscing by one or two slits — unilocular anthers are bilocellate and bilocular anthers 4-locellate before dehiscence). Ovary superior, unilocular; ovules usually solitary, sometimes two to numerous, erect to pendulous, placentation basal; style very short or obsolete to long and slender; stigmas capitate (simple or penicillate) or up to 2–3 (−6) and long and slender. Fruit an irregularly rupturing capsule with thin membranous walls (sometimes called a “utricle” but this is scarcely accurate), less frequently circumscissile, rarely a berry or crustaceous. Seed globular to lenticular or ovoid, rarely arillate; embryo curved or circular, surrounding the ± copious starchy perisperm, true endosperm scanty.

The author wishes to thank Dr. G. Benl for advice on Ptilotus, Mr. T. Reynolds for advice on sources for phytochemistry in the family, Miss Susan Zmarzty, who did most of the palynological work, and Mrs. M. Harley, who also helped in this direction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  • Aellen, P. 1959. Amaranthaceae. In: Hegi, G. (Ed.) Illustrierte Flora von Mitteleuropa, ed. 2, 3(2): pp. 461–532. Berlin: Parey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Airy Shaw, H. K. 1973. A dictionary of the flowering plants and ferns (J.C. Willis). Ed.8, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behnke, H.-D. 1976. Ultrastructure of sieve-element plastids in Caryophyllales (Centrospermae); evidence for the delimitation and classification of the Order. Pl. Syst. Evol. 126: 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carolin, R. C. 1983. The trichomes of the Chenopodiaceae and Amaranthaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 103: 451–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaco, A. 1962. Les Amaranthaceae de l’Afrique au sud du Tropique du Cancer et de Madagascar. Mém. Mus. Natn. Hist. Nat. Paris Sér. B, 13: 1–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covas, G. 1939. Los géneros de Amarantáceas Argentinas. Rev. Argent. Agron. 6: 282–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliasson, V.H. 1988. Morphological characters and taxonomic relations among the genera of Amaranthaceae in the New World and the Hawaiian Islands. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 96: 235–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdtman, G. 1952. See General References.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W.F. 1959. Cytogenetic studies in Amaranthus. II. Natural interspecific hybridization between Amaranthus dubius and A. spinosus. Can. J. Bot. 37: 1063–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegnauer, R. 1964, 1966. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrickson, J., Sundberg, S. 1986. On the submersion of Dicraurus into Iresine (Amaranthaceae). Aliso 11: 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, J.D. 1880. Amaranthaceae. In Bentham, G., Hooker, J. D. (Eds), Genera Plantarum 3(1): 20–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kajale, L.B. 1940. A contribution to the embryology of the Amaranthaceae. Proc. Natl. Inst. Sci. India 6: 597–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, D.A., Tomlinson, M., Friedman, G., Broome, R. 1973. Stellate pore ornamentation in pollen grains of the Amaranthaceae. Pollen Spores 15: 345–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopriore, G.G. 1904. Staminodi delle Amaranthacee dal punto di vista morfologico, biologico e sistematico. In: Urban, I., Graebner, P. (Eds) Ascherson Festschrift 413-430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mears, J. A. 1967. Revision of Guilleminea (Brayulinea) including Gossypianthus. Sida 3: 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meikle, R.D. 1985. Flora of Cyprus, Vol.2: 1364. Kew: Bentham-Moxon Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moquin-Tandon. 1849. Amaranthaceae. In: De Candolle, A. P., Prodromus 13(2): 231–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowicke, J.W. 1975. Pollen morphology in the Order Centrospermae. Grana 15: 51–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal, M., Khoshoo, T.N. 1965. Origin of Amaranthus dubius. Curr. Sci. 34: 370–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paliwal, C.S., Gupta, B.P., Malasi, C.B. 1980. Structure and development of stomata in Centrospermae: I. Amaranthaceae and Nyctaginaceae. Ind. Forest. J. 3: 135–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinz, H. 1934. Amaranthaceae. In: Engler and Prantl (Eds) Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien 2nd edn., 16c: pp. 7-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, A.K., Banik, M. 1965. Cytological investigation of different genera of Amaranthaceae with a view to trace their interrelationships. Bull. Bot. Soc. Bengal 19: 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skvarla, J. J., Nowicke, J. 1976. Ultrastructure of pollen exine in Centrospermous families. Pl. Syst. Evol. 126: 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solymosi, P., Pusztai, T. 1984. Cytological study of stable viable morphological changes appearing in Amaranthus weed populations of maize monocultures. Acta Bot. Hung. 30: 47–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, C. C. 1974. Notes on Amaranthaceae 2. Kew Bull. 29: 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vishnu-Mittre, P. 1963. Pollen morphology of Indian Amaranthaceae. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 42: 86–101.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Townsend, C.C. (1993). Amaranthaceae. In: Kubitzki, K., Rohwer, J.G., Bittrich, V. (eds) Flowering Plants · Dicotyledons. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, vol 2. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02899-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02899-5_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08141-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-02899-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics