This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blum, W. (2015). Quality teaching of mathematical modelling: What do we know, what can we do? In S. J. Cho (Eds.), The proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education: Intellectual and attitudinal Changes (p. 73–96). New York: Springer.
Brady, C., & Lesh, R. (2015). A models and modelling approach to risk and uncertainty. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 12(1), 184–202.
Brady, C., Eames, C. L., & Lesh, R. (2015). Connecting real-world and in-school problem-solving experiences. Quadrante, 24(2), 5–38.
Brady, C., Dominguez, A., Glancy, A., Jung, H., McLean, J. & Middleton, J. (in press). Models and modelling working group. Proceedings of the Thirty-eighth Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona.
Brady, C., Eames, C. L., & Lesh, R. (2018). The student experience of model development activities: Going beyond correctness to meet the needs of a client. In W. Blum & S. Schukajlow (Eds.), Evaluierte Lernumgebungen zum Modellieren (pp. 73–92). Springer.
Chamberlin, M. T. (2005). Teachers’ discussions of students’ thinking: meeting the challenge of attending to students’ thinking. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 8(2), 141–170.
Cobb, P., McClain, K., de Silva Lamberg, T., & Dean, C. (2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13–24.
Diefes-Dux, H., Follman, D., Imbrie, P. K., Zawojewski, J., Capobianco, B., & Hjalmarson, M. A. (2004a). Model eliciting activities: an in-class approach to improving interest and persistence of women in engineering. In Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Salt Lake City. Bd. 1994.
Diefes-Dux, H. A., Moore, T. J., Zawojewski, J., Imbrie, P. K., & Follman, D. (2004b). A framework for posing open-ended engineering problems: model-eliciting activities. 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004, (p. 455–460). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2004.1408556.
Doerr, H. M., & Lesh, R. (2003). A modelling perspective on teacher development. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: a models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (p. 125–140). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
English, L. D., & Mousoulides, N. G. (2011). Engineering-based modelling experiences in the elementary and middle classroom (p. 173–194). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0449-7.
English, L. D., Jones, G., Bussi, M., Tirosh, D., Lesh, R., & Sriraman, B. (2008). Moving forward in international mathematics education research.
Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: a follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American educational research journal, 38(3), 653–689.
Guzey, S., Moore, T., & Morse, G. (2016). Student interest in engineering design-based science. School Science and Mathematics, 116(8), 411–419
Hamilton, E., Lesh, R. A., Lester, F., & Brilleslyper, M. (2008). Model-eliciting activities (MEAs) as a bridge between engineering education research and mathematics education research. Advances in Engineering Education, 1(2). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1076067.pdf
Hjalmarson, M. A., & Lesh, R. (2008). Design research: engineering, systems, products, and processes for innovation. Handbook of international research in mathematics education, Bd. 2.
Jung, H. (2015). Strategies to support students’ model development. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 21(1), 42–48.
Jung, H., & Brady, C. (2015). Roles of a teacher and researcher during in situ professional development around the implementation of mathematical modelling tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(6), 1–19.
Katims, N., & Lesh, R. (1994). PACKETS: a guidebook for inservice mathematics teacher development. Lexington: DC Heath.
Kelly, A. E., & Lesh, R. (Eds.). (2000). The handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kelly, A. E., Lesh, R., & Baec, J. Y. (2008). Handbook of innovative design research in science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) education. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.
Kuntze, S. (2011). In-service and prospective teachers’ views about modelling tasks in the mathematics classroom—Results of a quantitative empirical study. In Trends in teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 279–288). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kuntze, S., Silelr, H.-S., & Vogl, C. (2013). Teachers’ self-perceptions of their pedagogical content knowledge related to modelling – an empirical study with Austrian teachers. In G. Stillman, G. Kaiser, W. Blum & J. P. Brown (Eds.), Teaching mathematical modelling: connecting to research and practice (p. 317–326). Dordrecht: Springer.
Lesh, R. (2003). Models & modeling in mathematics education. Monograph for International Journal for Mathematical Thinking & Learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lesh, R. (2008). Volleyball model-eliciting activity. http://www.indiana.edu/~iucme/mathmodeling/docs/volleyball_prob.pdf
Lesh, R., & Doerr, H. M. (2003). In what ways does a models and modelling perspective move beyond constructivism? In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: a models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching (p. 519–556). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lesh, R., & Harel, G. (2003). Problem solving, modelling, and local conceptual development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2–3), 157–189.
Lesh, R., & Kelly, A. (2000). Multitiered teaching experiments. In A. Kelly & R. Lesh (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (p. 197–230). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lesh, R., & Lehrer, R. (2003). Models and modelling perspectives on the development of students and teachers. Mathematical thinking and learning, 5(2–3), 109–129.
Lesh, R., & Sriraman, B. (2005). Mathematics education as a design science. ZDM, 37(6), 490–505.
Lesh, R., Amit, M., & Schorr, R. (1997). Using “real-life” problems to prompt students to construct conceptual models for statistical reasoning. In I. Gal & J. B. Garfield (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 65–83). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Lesh, R., Cramer, K., Doerr, H., Post, T., & Zawojewski, J. (2003). Model development sequences. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching (p. 35–58). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Lesh, R., Carmona, L., & Moore, T. (2009). Six sigma learning gains and long-term retention of understanding and attitudes related to models and modelling. Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education: An International Journal, 9(1), 19–54.
Lesh, R., Haines, Galbraith, & Hurford (2010). International conference on the teaching of mathematical modelling and applications. In R. Lesh (Eds.), Modelling students’ mathematical modelling competencies. New York, NY: Springer.
Moore, T. J. (2008). Model-eliciting activities: a case-based approach for getting students interested in materials science and engineering. Journal of Materials Education, 30(5–6), 295–310.
Moore, T. J., & Diefes-Dux, H. A. (2004). Developing model-eliciting activities for undergraduate students based on advanced engineering content. 34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004. (p. 461–466). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2004.1408557.
Moore, T. J., Miller, R. L., Lesh, R. A., Stohlmann, M. S., & Kim, Y. R. (2013). Modelling in engineering: the role of representational fluency in students’ conceptual understanding. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(1), 141–178.
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
Schorr, R., & Lesh, R. (2003). A modelling approach for providing teacher development. In R. Lesh & H. Doerr (Eds.), Beyond constructivism: models and modelling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning and teaching (p. 141–158). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Schorr, R. Y., & Koellner-Clark, K. (2003). Using modelling approach to analyze the ways in which teachers consider new ways to teach mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2–3), 191–210.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2. edn.). Alexandra: ASCD.
Yildirim, T. P., Shuman, L., & Besterfield-Sacre, M. (2010). Model-eliciting activities: assessing engineering student problem solving and skill integration processes. International Journal of Engineering Education, 26(4), 831–845.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eames, C., Brady, C., Jung, H., Glancy, A., Lesh, R. (2018). Designing Powerful Environments to Examine and Support Teacher Competencies for Models and Modelling. In: Borromeo Ferri, R., Blum, W. (eds) Lehrerkompetenzen zum Unterrichten mathematischer Modellierung. Realitätsbezüge im Mathematikunterricht. Springer Spektrum, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22616-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22616-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Spektrum, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22615-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22616-9
eBook Packages: Life Science and Basic Disciplines (German Language)