Skip to main content

Abstract

Sociologists and demographers have long been interested in the role of economic uncertainty in family behavior. Despite the prevailing “bourgeois conviction” that economic uncertainty discourages people from having children, the empirical evidence on this issue is mixed. In this paper, I summarize the recent empirical evidence, and discuss the potential limitations of previous investigations. Among the possible shortcomings of these studies is that many relied exclusively on unemployment as an operational definition of labor market uncertainty. Subjective indicators of economic uncertainty, which measure the individual’s perception of his or her economic situation more directly, often were not available to researchers. Moreover, few of these studies explored group-specific differences in behavior. In this paper, we seek to overcome some of the limitations of these earlier analyses. Based on data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP), we study the role of perceived economic uncertainty in transitions to first and higher order births for the period 1990–2013. In addition, we examine how different population subgroups (stratified by education, parity, and age) respond to economic uncertainty.

Zusammenfassung

Der Zusammenhang von ökonomischer Unsicherheit und Geburtenentwicklung ist ein Themenfeld, das gleichermaßen von soziologischer wie auch von demografischer Bedeutung ist. Obwohl theoretische Überlegungen zumeist der „bürgerlichen Überzeugung“ verhaftet geblieben sind, dass ökonomische Unsicherheiten sich negativ auf das Geburtenverhalten niederschlagen sollten, haben empirische Studien in diesem Bereich eher uneinheitliche Befunde geliefert. Dieser Beitrag fasst aktuelle Studien zusammen und setzt sich kritisch mit den vorliegenden empirischen Befunden auseinander. Zum einen haben bisherige Studien zumeist nur Arbeitslosigkeit als Merkmal ökonomischer Sicherheit herangezogen. Subjektive Indikatoren, die unmittelbarer die aktuelle ökonomische Situation widerspiegeln, waren in den bisher verwendeten Daten oft nicht verfügbar. Darüber hinaus haben nur wenige Studien sich der Frage gewidmet, ob unterschiedliche Subpopulationen unterschiedlich auf ökonomische Unsicherheit reagieren. Mit diesem Beitrag soll ein Teil dieser Forschungslücke geschlossen werden, indem auf Basis der Daten des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels (SOEP) der Jahre 1990–2013 der Einfluss der wahrgenommenen ökonomischen Unsicherheit auf die Geburtenentwicklung untersucht wird. Darüber hinaus wird die Frage in den Mittelpunkt gerückt, ob gruppenspezifische Unterschiede im Verhalten existieren und verschiedene Bevölkerungsgruppen (differenziert nach Bildung, Parität und Alter) anders auf ökonomische Unsicherheiten reagieren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adsera, Alicia. 2011. Where are the babies? Labor market conditions and fertility in Europe. European Journal of Population27:1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley, Sunnee. 2011. Economic crisis and recovery: Changes in second birth rates within occupational classes and educational groups. Demographic Research24:375–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, Mary O’ Malley. 1989. The income-fertility relationship: Effect of the net price of a child. Demography26:301–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brentano, Lujo. 1910. The doctrine of Malthus and the increase of population during the last decades. The Economic Journal20:371–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, John C., and Thomas Schindlmayr. 2003. Explanations of the fertility crisis in modern societies: A search for commonalities. Population Studies57: 241–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • De La Rica, Sara, and Amaia Iza. 2005. Career planning in Spain: Do fixed-term contracts delay marriage and parenthood? Review of Economics of the Household3:49–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Bono, Emilia, Andrea Weber, and Rudolf Winter-Ebmer. 2014. Fertility and economic instability: The role of unemployment and job displacement. Journal Population Economics(forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellingsæter, Anne Lise, and Eirin Pedersen. 2015. Institutional trust: Family policy and fertility in Norway. Social Politics. (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gosta. 1999. Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedlander, Dov. 1992. The British depression and nuptiality: 1873-1896. Journal of Interdisciplinary History23:19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Debra, Michael Hechter, and Satoshi Kanazawa. 1994. A theory of the value of children. Demography 31:375–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebel, Michael, and Johannes Giesecke. 2009. Ökonomische Unsicherheit und Fertilität. Die Wirkung von Beschäftigungsunsicherheit und Arbeitslosigkeit auf die Familiengründung in Ost- und Westdeutschland. Zeitschrift für Soziologie38:399–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Joshua, Michaela Kreyenfeld, Aiva Jasilioniene, and Deniz Dilan Karaman Örsal. 2013. Fertility reactions to the “Great Recession” in Europe: Recent evidence from order-specific data. Demographic Research29:85–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez-Domènech, Maria. 2008. The impact of the labour market on the timing of marriage and births in Spain. Journal of Population Economics21:83–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huttunen, Kristiina, and Jenni Kellokumpu. 2015. The effect of job displacement on couples' fertility decisions. Journal of Labor Economic(forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kravdal, Øystein. 2002. The impact of individual and aggregate unemployment on fertility in Norway. Demographic Research6:263–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreyenfeld, Michaela. 2002. Time squeeze, partner effect or self-selection? An investigation into the positive effect of women's education on second birth risks in West Germany. Demographic Research 7:15–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreyenfeld, Michaela. 2010. Uncertainties in female employment careers and the postponement of parenthood in Germany. European Sociological Review26:351–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreyenfeld, Michaela, and Gunnar Andersson. 2014. Socio-economic differences in the unemployment and fertility nexus in cross-national comparison. Advances in Life Course Research21:59–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreyenfeld, Michaela, Gunnar Andersson, and Ariane Pailhé. 2012. Economic uncertainty and family dynamics. Special Collection 12 of Demographic Research. Lanzieri, Giampaolo. 2013. Towards a ‘baby recession’ in Europe? Differential fertility trends during the economic crisis. Eurostat, Statistics in Focus13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesthaeghe, Ron. 2010. The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review36:211–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luci, Angela, and Olivier Thévenon. 2009. Does economic development drive the fertility rebound in OECD countries? Population(English Selection) 64:235–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenroth, Gerhard. 1953. Bevölkerungslehre. Theorie, Soziologie und Statistik der Bevölkerung. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matysiak, Anna, and Daniele Vignoli. 2008. Fertility and women's employment: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Population24:363–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matz, Klaus-Jürgen. 1980. Pauperismus und Bevölkerung: Die gesetzlichen Ehebeschränkungen in den süddeutschen Staaten während des 19. Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maul, Katharina. 2012. Der Einfluss der beruflichen Tätigkeit auf die Familiengründung. Würzburg: Ergon.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, Peter. 2000. Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of Population Research17:1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Melinda, and Hans-Peter Blossfeld. 2003. Globalization, uncertainty and changes in early life courses. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft6:188–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mombert, Paul. 1907. Die Bevölkerungsbewegung in Deutschland in den letzten Jahrzehnten mit besonderer Berücksichtigun der ehelichen Fruchtbarkeit. Karlsruhe: G. Braunsche Hofdruckerei und Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neels, Karel, Zita Theunynck, and Jonas Wood. 2013. Economic recession and first births in Europe: Recession-induced postponement and recuperation of fertility in 14 European countries between 1970 and 2005. International Journal of Public Health 58:43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyer, Gerda. 2003. Family policies and low fertility in Western Europe. Journal of Population and Social Security(Supplement to Volume 1): 46–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyer, Gerda, and Gunnar Andersson. 2008. Consequences of family policies on childbearing behavior: Effects or artifacts? Population and Development Review34:699–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özcan, Berkay, Karl Ulrich Mayer, and Joerg Luedicke. 2010. The impact of unemployment on the transition to parenthood. Demographic Research23:807–846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pailhé, Ariane, and Anne Solaz. 2012. The influence of employment uncertainty on childbearing in France: A tempo or quantum effect? Demographic Research26:1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Promberger, Markus et al. 2014. Patterns of resilience during socioeconomic crises among households in Europe. IAB-Forschungsbericht 05/2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendall, Michael S., Olivia Ekert-Jaffe, Heather Joshi, Kevin Lynch, and Rémi Mougin. Universal versus economically polarized change in age at first birth: A French-British comparison. Population and Development Review35:89–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Dominic. 2010. Child and family policies in a time of economic crisis. Children & Society24: 495–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss, Ronald R., Philip S. Morgan, and Gray Swicegood. 1988. First births in America: Changes in the timing of parenthood. London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Christian. 2012a. A cross-national perspective on unemployment and first births. European Journal of Population28:303–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Christian. 2012b. Labour market integration, occupational uncertainties, and fertility choices in Germany and the UK. Demographic Research26:253–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, Jette. 2010. Der Zusammenhang zwischen der Erwerbstätigkeit von Frauen und ihrer Fertilität. Würzburg: Ergon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, Paul T. 1976. Determinants of fertility: A micro-economic model of choice. In Economic Factors in Population Growth, ed Ansley Coale, 89–135. New York: Halsted Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobotka, Tomás, Vegard Skirbekk, and Dimiter Philipov. 2011. Economic recession and fertility in the developed world. Population and Development Review37:267–306. Statistics Denmark. 2014. Total fertility rate (www.statbank.dk/FERT1).

  • Testa, Maria Rita, and Stuart Basten. 2014. Certainty of meeting fertility intentions declines in Europe during the ‘Great Recession’. Demographic Research31:687–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Kaa, Dirk. 1987. Europe's second demographic transition. Population Bulletin42:3–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vignoli, Daniele, Sven Drefahl, and Gustavo De Santis. 2012. Whose job instability affects the likelihood of becoming a parent in Italy? A tale of two partners. Demographic Research26:41–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlachadis, Nikolaos, Zoe Iliodromiti, Maria Vlachadi, and George Creatsas. 2014. Greece's birth rates and the economic crisis. Lancet383:692–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Gert G., Joachim R. Frick, and Jürgen Schupp. 2007. The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP): Scope, evolution and enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch127:139–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, Robert J. 1987. What have we learned from the economics of the family? The American Economic Review77:68–81.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Karsten Hank Michaela Kreyenfeld

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kreyenfeld, M. (2016). Economic Uncertainty and Fertility. In: Hank, K., Kreyenfeld, M. (eds) Social Demography Forschung an der Schnittstelle von Soziologie und Demografie. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11490-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11490-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-11489-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-11490-9

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics