Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

E-Democracy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Zeitgenössische Demokratietheorie

Zusammenfassung

Obwohl die Idee demokratischer Selbstregierung universell ist, variiert historisch die Art und Weise, wie sie konkret umgesetzt wird. Viele Faktoren beeinflussen ihre Implementation, so u. a. die Größe des demokratischen Gemeinwesens, der Grad an gesellschaftlicher Modernität oder die dominanten Traditionslinien politischen Denkens (liberal/republikanisch). Der seit den 1990er Jahren sehr intensiv geführte interdisziplinäre Diskurs über E-Democracy richtet sein Erkenntnisinteresse auf das Niveau der technologischen Entwicklung eines politischen Gemeinwesens und analysiert den systematischen Einfluss, den die neuen Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien (IKT) auf Demokratien ausüben (vgl. Vedel 2006: 226).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Arterton, Frederick Christopher (1987): Teledemocracy: Can Technology Protect Democracy? Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiocchi, Gianpaolo/ Heller, Patrick/ Silva, Marcelo (2011): Bootstrapping Democracy: Transforming Local Governance and Civil Society in Brazil. Stanford/CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Benjamin (1984): Strong Democracy, Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley/ CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • – (1998): Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong Democracy. In: Political Science Quarterly 113(4), 573–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, David M. (2011): The Computational Turn: Thinking About the Digital Humanities. Unter: http://www.culturemachine.net/index.php/cm/article/view/440/470 [5.2.2014].

  • Buchstein, Hubertus (1997): Bytes That Bite: The Internet and Deliberative Democracy. In: Constellations 4(2), 248–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck, Sebastian (2012): Liquid Democracy – eine Realisierung deliberativer Hoffnungen? Zum Selbstverständnis der Piratenpartei. In: Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 43(3), 626–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, Stephen/ Blumler, Jay G. (2009): The Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, Lincoln (2011): Re-constructing Digital Democracy: An Outline of Four „Positions“. In: New Media and Society 13(6), 855–872.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, Lincoln/ Siapera, Eugenia (Hrsg.) (2007): Radical Democracy and the Internet: Interrogating Theory and Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Jodi (2003): Why the Net is not a Public Sphere. In: Constellations 10(1), 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, Karl W. (1963): The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control. London: Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, Esther et al. (1994): Cyberspace and the American Dream: A Magna Carta for the Knowledge Age. Unter: http://www.pff.org/issues-pubs/futureinsights/fi1.2magnacarta.html [5.2.2014].

  • Earl, Jennifer/ Kimport, Katrina (2011): Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, David (1965): A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, Amitai W. (1968): The Active Society: A Theory of Societal and Political Processes. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Leighton/ Rees, Sian (2012): An Interpretation of Digital Humanities. In: Berry, David M. (Hrsg.): Understanding Digital Humanities. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillon, 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, Bryan (2002): Delegative Democracy. Unter: http://www.brynosaurus.com/deleg/deleg.pdf [5.2.2014].

  • Fung, Archon/ Gilman, Hollie Russon/ Shkabatur, Jennifer (2013): Six Models for the Internet and Politics. In: International Studies Review 15(1), 30–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, Bill (1995): The Road Ahead. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geis, Anna/ Nullmeier, Frank/ Daase, Christopher (Hrsg.) (2012): Der Aufstieg der Legitimitätspolitik. Rechtfertigung und Kritik politisch-ökonomischer Ordnungen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geißel, Brigitte/ Newton, Kenneth (Hrsg.) (2012): Evaluating Democratic Innovations: Curing the Democratic Malaise? New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimmler, Antje (2001): Deliberative Democracy, the Public Sphere and the Internet. In: Philosophy and Social Criticism 27(4), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingrich, Newt (1995): To Renew America. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, Eszter/ Gallo, Jason/ Kane, Matthew (2008): Cross-ideological Discussions among Conservative and Liberal Bloggers. In: Public Choice 134, 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassid, Jonathan (2012): Safety Valve or Pressure Cooker? Blogs in Chinese Political Life. In: Journal of Communication 62(2), 212–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepp, Andreas (2011): Medienkultur. Die Kultur mediatisierter Welten. Wiesbaden: VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, Richard (1985): Video Democracy: The Vote-from-home Revolution. Mt. Airy, MD: Lomond Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, Philip N./ Hussain, Muzammil M. (2011): The Upheavals in Egypt and Tunisia: The Role of Digital Media. In: Journal of Democracy 22(3), 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • – (2013)/Hussain, Muzammil M. (2013): What Best Explains Successful Protest Cascades? ICTs and the Fuzzy Causes of the Arab Spring. In: International Studies Review 57(1), 48–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald (1971): The Silent Revolution in Europe: Intergenerational Change in Post-Industrial Societies. In: The American Political Science Review 65(4), 991–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. Kent/Zeitner, Vicki (2003): Internet Use and Civic Engagement: A Longitudinal Analysis. In: The Public Opinion Quarterly 67(3), 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Steven (2012): Future Perfect: The Case for Progress in a Networked Age. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaase, Max/ Marsh, Alan (1979): Political Action: A Theoretical Perspective. In: Barnes, Samuel H./ Kaase, Max et al.: Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills/London: Sage, 27–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamps, Klaus (2000): Die Agora des Internet. Zur Debatte politischer Öffentlichkeit und Partizipation im Netz. In: Jarren, Otfried/ Imhof, Kurt/ Blum, Roger (Hrsg.): Zerfall der Öffentlichkeit? Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 227–239.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Khondker, Habibul Haque (2011): The Role of New Media in the Arab Spring. In: Globalizations 8(5), 675–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klofstad, Casey A. (2011): Civic Talk: Peers, Politics, and the Future of Democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas (1969): Legitimation durch Verfahren. Neuwied/Berlin: Luchterhand. – (1997): Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, Thomas W./ Klein, Mark (2007): Harnessing Collective Intelligence to Address Global Climate Change. In: Innovations 2(3), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manin, Bernard (1997): The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, Wolfgang/ Petring, Alexander (2011): Partizipation und Inklusion. In: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (Hrsg.): Demokratie in Deutschland 2011. Unter: www.demokratiedeutschland –2011.de/common/pdf/Partizipation_und_Inklusion.pdf [5.2.2014].

  • Michelsen, Danny/ Walter, Franz (2013): Unpolitische Demokratie. Zur Krise der Repräsentation. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozov, Evgeny (2011): The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York, NY: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, Diana (2006): Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Negroponte, Nicholas (1995): Being Digital. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa (2001): Digital Divide. Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, Beth Simone (2008): Wiki-Government: How Open-source Technology Can Make Government Decision-making More Expert and More Democratic. Unter: http://www.democracyjournal.org/7/6570.php?page=all [5.2.2014].

  • – (2009): Wiki government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paetsch, Jennifer/ Reichert, Daniel (2012): Liquid Democracy. Neue Wege der politischen Partizipation. In: Vorgänge 4, 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Päivärinta, Tero/ Øystein, Sæbø (2006): Models of E-Democracy. Unter: http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol17/iss1/37 [5.2.2014].

  • Papacharissi, Zizi (2010): A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patemann, Carole (1971): Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, Claus/ Lindh, Jörgen (2013): E-Participation in Practice: From a Citizen Perspective. In: Journal of E-Government Studies and Best Practices, 1–16. Unter: http://www.ibimapublishing.com/journals/JEGSBP/2012/184841/184841.pdf

  • Piratenpartei Deutschland (Hrsg.) (2011): Wahlprogramm Berlin 2011. Unter: http://www.piratenpartei.de/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Wahlprogramm-Berlin–2011.pdf [1.9.2013].

  • Rheingold, Howard (1994): The Virtual Community. Unter: http://www.rheingold.com/vc/book/ [5.2.2014].

  • Ritzi, Claudia/ Schaal, Gary S. (2013): Zwischen Ernst und Unterhaltung – Eine empirische Analyse der Motive politischer Aktivität junger Erwachsener im Internet. Unter: http://www.hsu-hh.de/politiktheorie/index_XOQGMOIlQ10DTTXq.html [5.2.2014].

  • Sartori, Giovanni (1987): The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaal, Gary S. (Hrsg.) (2002): Vertrauen. Mikrofundierung sozialer und politischer Ordnungen. Schwerpunktheft der Österreichischen Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaal, Gary S./ Lemke, Matthias/ Ritzi, Claudia (2014): Ökonomisierung statt Neoliberalismus. Eine Forschungsheuristik zur Analyse der Hegemonialwerdung von Marktlogiken in zeitgenössischen Demokratien. Manuskript, Helmut-Schmidt-Universität, Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, D. (1999): Global Communication and Community Networks: How Do We Institutionalize Democracy in the Electronic Age. In: Communications and Strategies 31. Unter: http://www.scn.org/ip/commnet/its98.html [5.2.2014].

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1942): Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah, Dhavan V. et al. (2005): Information and Expression in a Digital Age: Modeling Internet Effects on Civic Participation. In: Communication Research 32(5), 531–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, Ian et al. (Hrsg.) (2009): Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, Cass (2001): Republic.com. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • – (2002): The Law of Group Polarization. In: Journal of Political Philosophy 10(2), 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • – (2006): Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • – (2009): Republic.com 2.0. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • – (2009): Republic.com 2.0. Princeton/NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Surowiecki, J. (2004): The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies and Nations. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvester, Dari E./ McGlynn, Adam J. (2010): The Digital Divide, Political Participation, and Place. In: Social Science Computer Review 28(1), 64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D./ Williams, A. (2006): Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. London: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedel, Thierry (2006): The Idea of Electronic Democracy: Origins, Visions and Questions. In: Parliamentary Affairs 59(2), 226–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, Norbert (1948): Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. New York: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfer, Simon (2013): Demokratie per Mausklick? Interview mit Liquid Democracy e. V. In: PowiVision 12. Unter: http://www.uni-leipzig.de/~powision/wordpress/magazin/demokratie-per-mausklick/ [5.2.2014]

  • Yamakawa, Hiroshi/ Yoshida, Michiko/ Tsuchiya, Motohiro (2007): Toward Delegated Democracy: Vote by Yourself, or Trust Your Network. In: International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 1(2), 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, Ann C. (2007): Online-Öffentlichkeiten als Gegenstand empirischer Forschung. In: Berliner Journal für Soziologie 17(2), 167-187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Helmut-Schmidt-Universität/Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Holstenhofweg 85, 22043, Hamburg, Deutschland

    Prof. Dr. Gary S. Schaal

Authors
  1. Prof. Dr. Gary S. Schaal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary S. Schaal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Univ. Jena Rechtswissenschaftliche Fak., Jena, Germany

    Oliver W. Lembcke

  2. Lehrstuhl für Politische Theorie, Helmut-Schmidt-Universität/ Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Claudia Ritzi

  3. Helmut-Schmidt Univ./ Inst. f. Politikwissenschaft, Hamburg, Germany

    Gary S. Schaal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schaal, G. (2016). E-Democracy. In: Lembcke, O., Ritzi, C., Schaal, G. (eds) Zeitgenössische Demokratietheorie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06363-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06363-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-06362-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-06363-4

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation