Skip to main content

Constructivism and selection: two opposed theories of social evolution

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strukturen des Denkens

Part of the book series: Neue Bibliothek der Sozialwissenschaften ((NBDS))

  • 2418 Accesses

Abstract

This paper examines why natural selection is incapable of explaining social evolution, which instead requires a constructivist model. Natural selection reduces sociocultural systems to populations of traits, requires variation and selection to have distinct origins, and treats adaptation as the main explanatory principle. Constructivism, however, denies these assumptions as inappropriate to sociocultural systems. Here, variation and selection are linked together, and development occurs through an accumulation of various institutions. Because competition may often be low, these may be adaptively mediocre but, especially in combination, may still be the basis of further evolution. Necessary conditions for development include social size, sedentism, differentiated groups, and political centralisation. Social traditions, however, have core principles which may inhibit or facilitate evolutionary development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abercrombie, M., et al. 1973. The Penguin Dictionary of Biology. 6th ed. London:Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkow, J., Cosmides, L., and Tooby, J. 1992. The Adapted Mind. Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., and Richerson, P.J. 2006. Not by Genes Alone. How culture transformed the evolutionary process. Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claessen, H.J.M. 1978. ‘The early state: a structural approach’, in The Early State, eds. H.J.M. Claessen & P. Skalnik, 535-96. The Hague: Mouton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dumond, D.E. 1965. ‘Population growth and cultural change’, Southwestern Journal of anthropology, 21, 302–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dux, G. 2011. Historico-Genetic Theory of Culture. On the processual logic of cultural change. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, H.A.L. 1936. A History of Europe. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, I. 1970. Ancient Polynesian Society. Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallpike, C.R. 1979. The Foundations of Primitive Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallpike, C.R. 1984. ‘The relevance of the theory of inclusive fitness to human society’. Journal of Social and Biological. Structures. 7, 131–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallpike, C.R. 1986. The Principles of Social Evolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallpike, C.R. 2008a.The Konso of Ethiopia. A study of the values of an East Cushitic society. AuthorHouse UK. Revised edition of 1st edition, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallpike, C.R. 2008b. How We Got Here. From bows and arrows to the space age. Bloomington, Indiana: AuthorHouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallpike, C.R. 2011. ‘Some anthropological objections to evolutionary psychology’ in On Primitive Society, and other forbidden topics. 214-55. Bloomington, Indiana: AuthorHouse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. 1960. ‘Adaptation in biological and cultural science’, Transactions of the New York Academy of Science, 23. 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, H.S. 1974. ‘Neighbours, friends, and kinsmen: principles of social organization among the Cushitic-speaking peoples of Ethiopia’. Ethnology, 13. 145–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., and Laland, K.N. 2004. ‘Perspective: Is human cultural evolution Darwinian? Evidence reviewed from the perspective of The Origin of Species’, Evolution, 58(1). 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. 1963. ‘Poor man, rich man, big-man, chief: political types in Melanesia and Polynesia’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5(3). 285–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straube, H. 1963. West Kuschitsche Völker Süd-Äthiopiens. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. 2009. Why We Co-operate.Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigger, B. 1990. Understanding Ancient Civilizations. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G.C. 1966. Adaptation and Natural selection. A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C.R. Hallpike .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hallpike, C. (2014). Constructivism and selection: two opposed theories of social evolution. In: Dux, G., Rüsen, J. (eds) Strukturen des Denkens. Neue Bibliothek der Sozialwissenschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06255-2_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06255-2_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-06254-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-06255-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics