Skip to main content

Collaborative Communities als Organisationsform für Innovation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Motoren der Innovation

Zusammenfassung

Die heutigen Rahmenbedingungen für Unternehmen -insbesondere in wissensintensiven Branchen- sind gekennzeichnet von rasantem technischem Fortschritt und Technologiekonvergenz, zunehmend anspruchsvollen Kunden, kürzer werdenden Produktlebenszyklen, rasant ansteigenden Datenvolumina und exponentiell wachsendem Wissen, hoher Konnektivität und sprunghaft gestiegener Komplexität (Kratzer et al., 2008). Unter diesen Bedingungen kommen traditionelle Organisationsformen zunehmend unter Druck (Miles et al., 2010; Snow et al., 2011). Diese Formen nutzen Hierarchie als dominantes Schema für Koordination und Kontrolle und umfassen Archetypen wie die funktionale Organisation, die divisionale Organisation, die Matrixorganisation sowie Mehrfirmennetzwerke (Fjeldstad et al., 2012).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Afuah, A. & Tucci, C. (2012): Crowdsourcing as a Solution to Distant Search. In: Academy of Management Review, 37 (3): 355–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Araújo, A.L., Lettl, C. & Ulhøi, J.P. (2014): Extending organizational antecedents of absorptive capacity: Organizational characteristics that encourage experimentation. In: Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faraj, S., Jarvenpaa, S. & Majchrzak, A. (2011): Knowledge collaboration in online communities. In: Organization Science, 22 (5): 1224–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farjoun, M. (2010): Beyond dualism: Stability and change as duality. In: Academy of Management Review, 35 (2): 202–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fjelstad, O., Snow, C., Miles, R. & Lettl, C. (2012): The architecture of collaboration. In: Strategic Management Journal, 33 (6): 734–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N. (2005): Open Source & Co.: Innovative User-Netzwerke. In: Sönke A. & Gassmann, O.: Handbuch Technologie- und Innovationsmanagement: 695-712. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, N. & Klausberger, K. (2010): Die Architektur von Crowdsourcing : Wie begeistert man die Crowd?. In: Gassmann, O. (Hrsg.): Crowdsourcing: Innovationsmanagement mit Schwarmintelligenz: 31-55. München: Carl Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemünden, H. G., Hölzle, K. & Lettl, C. (2006): Formale und informale Determinanten des Innovationserfolges: Eine kritische Analyse des Zusammenspiels der Kräfte am Beispiel der Innovatorenrollen. In: Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 58, Sonderheft 54/06: 110–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., & Hippel, E. (2003): Profiting from voluntary information spillovers: how users benefit by freely revealing their innovations. In: Research Policy 32 (10): 1753–1769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Högl, M., Weinkauf, K. & Gemünden, H.G. (2004): Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R & D projects: A longitudinal study. In: Organization Science, 15 (1): 38–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keinz, P., Hienerth, C. & Lettl, C. (2012): Designing the organization for user innovation. In: Journal of Organization Design, 1 (3): 20–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, J., Gemünden, H.G. & Lettl, C. (2008): Revealing dynamics and consequences of fit and misfit between formal and informal networks in multi-institutional product development collaborations. In: Research Policy 37 (8): 1356–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakhani, K.R., Jeppesen, L.B., Lohse, P.A. & Panetta, J.A. (2007): The Value of Openness in Scientific Problem Solving, Working Paper, Division of Research, Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettl, C., Hienerth, C. & Gemünden, H.G. (2008): Exploring How Lead users Develop Radical Innovation: Opportunity Recognition and Exploitation in the Field of Medical Equipment Technology. In: IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 55: 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R.E., Snow, C., Fjeldstad, Ø.D., Miles, G. & Lettl, C. (2010): Designing organizations to meet 21st-century opportunities and challenges. In: Organizational Dynamics, 39 (2): 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, F. & O’Mahoney, S. (2007): Exploring the foundations of cumulative innovation: Implications for organization science. In: Organization Science, 18 (6): 1006–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, W. & Jeon, S. (2007): Membership herding and network stability in the open source community: The Ising perspective. In: Management Science, 53 (7): 1086–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, S. & Ferraro, F. (2007) The emergence of governance in an open source community. In: Academy of Management Journal, 50 (5): 1079–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puranam, P., Alexy, O. & Reitzig, M. (2014): What’s “New About New Forms of Organizing”. In: Academy of Management Review. Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rost, K., Hölzle, K. & Gemünden, H.G. (2006): Promotors or champions? Pros and cons of role specialization for economic process. In: Schmalenbach Business Review, 59: 340–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C., Fjeldstad, Ø.D., Lettl, C. & Miles, R. (2011): Organizing continuous product development and commercialization: The collaborative community of firms model. In: Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28 (1): 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998): Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zboralski, K. & Gemünden, H.G. (2007): Meeting the challenges of the knowledge-based economy: the role of knowledge networks. In: Systems Science, 33 (2): 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zboralski, K., Salomo, S. & Gemünden, H.G. (2006): Organisational Benefits of Communities of Practice – A Two-Stage Information Processing Model. In: Cybernetics and Systems, 37 (6): 533–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Lettl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lettl, C., Speckbacher, G. (2014). Collaborative Communities als Organisationsform für Innovation. In: Schultz, C., Hölzle, K. (eds) Motoren der Innovation. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06135-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06135-7_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-06134-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-06135-7

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics