Skip to main content

The ALARM Monitoring System: A Case Study with two Probabilistic Inference Techniques for Belief Networks

  • Conference paper
AIME 89

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Medical Informatics ((LNMED,volume 38))

Abstract

ALARM (A Logical Alarm Reduction Mechanism) is a diagnostic application used to explore probabilistic reasoning techniques in belief networks. ALARM implements an alarm message system for patient monitoring; it calculates probabilities for a differential diagnosis based on available evidence. The medical knowledge is encoded in a graphical structure connecting 8 diagnoses, 16 findings and 13 intermediate variables. Two algorithms were applied to this belief network: (1) a message-passing algorithm by Pearl for probability updating in multiply connected networks using the method of conditioning; and (2) the Lauritzen-Spiegelhalter algorithm for local probability computations on graphical structures. The characteristics of both algorithms are analyzed and their specific applications and time complexities are shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andreassen, S. K., Woldbye, M., Falck, B., Andersen, S. K., MUNIN — a causal probabilistic network for interpretation of electro-myographic findings. In Proc. 10th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Milan, pp. 366–372, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chavez, R. M., and Cooper, G. F., KNET: Integrating hypermedia and normative Bayesian modeling. Proceedings of the Fourth AAAI Workshop on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 49–54, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Darroch, J. N., Lauritzen, S. L., and Speed, T. P., Markov fields and log-linear models for contingency tables, Annals of Statistics, 8, pp. 522–539, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gavril, T., Algorithms for minimum coloring, maximum clique, minimum coloring by cliques and maximum independent set of a choral graph. SIAM J Comput 1, pp. 180–187, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Howard, R. A., and Matheson, J. E., Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis, 2nd edition. Strategic Decision Group, Menlo Park, CA, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lauritzen, S. L., and Spiegelhalter, D. J., Local Computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems. J R Statist Soc B, 50:2, pp. 157–224, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leimer, H. G., Strongly decomposable graphs and hypergraphs. Thesis 85-1, Bereich für Stochastik und verwandte Gebiete., Univ. of Mainz, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pearl, J., A constraint-propagation approach to probabilistic reasoning. In: Kanal, L.N. and Lemmers, J.F., eds., Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 357–369, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pearl, J., Fusion, propagation and structuring in belief networks. Artificial Intelligence, 29, pp.241–288, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pearl, J., Distributed revision of composite beliefs. Artificial Intelligence, 33, pp. 173–215, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shachter, R. D., Evaluating influence diagrams. Operations Research, 34, pp. 871–882, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shachter, R. D., and Heckerman, D. E., Thinking backward for knowledge acquisition. AI Magazine, Fall 1987, pp. 55–61, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Spiegelhalter, D. J., Coherent evidence propagation in expert systems, The Statistician, 36, pp. 201–210, 1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Spiegelhalter, D. J., Fast algorithms for probabilistic reasoning in influence diagrams, with applications in genetics and expert systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Influence Diagrams for Decision Analysis, Inference, and Prediction, Berkeley,CA, May, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Suermondt, H. J., and Cooper, G. F., Updating probabilities in multiply-connected belief networks. Proceedings of the Fourth AAAI Workshop on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Minneapolis, MN, pp. 335–343, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tarjan, R.E., and Yannakakis, M., Simple linear-time algorithms to test chordality of graphs, test acyclicity of hypergraphs, and selectively reduce hypergraphs. SIAM J Comput, 13, pp. 566–579, 1984

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Beinlich, I.A., Suermondt, H.J., Chavez, R.M., Cooper, G.F. (1989). The ALARM Monitoring System: A Case Study with two Probabilistic Inference Techniques for Belief Networks. In: Hunter, J., Cookson, J., Wyatt, J. (eds) AIME 89. Lecture Notes in Medical Informatics, vol 38. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93437-7_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-93437-7_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-51543-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-93437-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics