Skip to main content

An Impossibility Theorem for Fair Bidimensional Representation: Towards a Biproportional Solution

  • Chapter
Mathematical Psychology in Progress

Part of the book series: Recent Research in Psychology ((PSYCHOLOGY))

Abstract

This paper concerns fair (proportional) representation of a population which is divided into categories according to two criteria as is the case, for example, when an electoral system takes into account the geographical as well as the political group of the elector. Our first model leads us to the conclusion that, on the one hand, there can be no fair representation — under our very weak conditions — as soon there are more than two constituencies or more than two parties, but on the other hand, a two by two situation can always be fairly represented. As these results are mainly negative, we go on to a second model and we give a necessary and sufficient condition for the existence of a biproportional delegation.

Several conversations with G. De Meur, X. Hubaut and Ph. Vincke stimulated a revision of a first draft of this paper, including shortcuts in the proof of our possibility theorem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anthonisse, J.M. (1984). Evenredige Vertegenwoordiging in het Kader van Gemeenschappelijke Regelingen. Notitie OS-N8401, Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, M. (1970). Bi proportional Matrices and Input-Output Change. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balinski, M.L. and Young, H.P. (1982). Fair Representation Meeting the Ideal of One Man, One Vote. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, L.H. and Ernst, L.R. (1982). Controlled Rounding. INFOR, 20, 423–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Meur, G., Gassner, M. and Hubaut, X. (1984). The Problem of Representation based upon Two Criteria. In: E. Degreef and J. Van Buggenhaut (Eds.), Trends in Mathematical Psychology. North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Meur, G., Gassner, M. and Hubaut, X. (1985), A Mathematical Model for Political Bipolarization. European Journal of Political Research, 13, 409–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassner, M. (1987). Elections Législatives Belges: Défauts connus et moins connus de la Méthode de Répartition des Sièges, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gassner, M.B. (1989). An Impossibility Theorem for Fair Bidimensional Representation: Towards a Biproportional Solution. In: Roskam, E.E. (eds) Mathematical Psychology in Progress. Recent Research in Psychology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83943-6_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83943-6_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-51686-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-83943-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics