Skip to main content

Detecting and Responding to Plan-Oriented Misconceptions

  • Conference paper
User Models in Dialog Systems

Part of the book series: Symbolic Computation ((1064))

Abstract

This chapter2 discusses the problem of detecting and responding to plan-oriented misconceptions in advice-seeking dialogs, concentrating on the problems of novice computer users. A cooperative response is one which not only corrects the user’s mistaken belief but also addresses the missing or mistaken user beliefs that led to it. Providing a cooperative response is presented as a process of the advisor trying to explain why he doesn’t hold the user’s belief and presenting this explanation to the user. An explanation is shown to correspond to a set of advisor beliefs that together contradict the user’s belief, and searching for an explanation to determine whether various abstract configurations of advisor beliefs hold. The search for an explanation makes use of both domain-specific advisor beliefs and a taxonomy of domain-independent explanations for potential user misconceptions. A taxonomy for misconceptions involving plan applicability conditions, preconditions, and effects is presented, along with a method of organizing the necessary advisor planning knowledge.

This chapter is an extended and revised version of [QUIL88].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abelson, R. (1973): The Structure of Belief Systems. In: R. C. Schank and K. M. Colby, eds.: Computer Models of Thought and Language. San Francisco, CA: Freeman. [QUIL*: 111]

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abelson, R. (1979): Differences between Belief and Knowledge Systems. Cognitive Science 3, 355–366. [QUIL*: 111]

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alvarado, S., M. Dyer and M. Flowers (1986): Editorial Comprehension in OpED through Argument Units. In: Proc. AAAI-86, 250–256. [QUIL*: 112]

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, J. R., C. F. Boyle and G. Yost (1985): The Geometry Tutor. In: Proc. IJCAI-85, 1–7. [CHIN*: 77, 100; QUIL*: 116, 125; KASS*: 393]

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, J. S. and R. R. Burton (1978): Diagnostic Models for Procedural Bugs in Basic Mathematical Skills. Cognitive Science 2, 155–192. [CHIN*: 77, 100; QUIL*: 116, 125; MCCO*: 237; KASS*: 392, 394; FINI*: 414]

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burton, R. R. (1982): Diagnosing Bugs in a Simple Procedural Skill. In: D. H. Sleeman and J. S. Brown, eds.: Intelligent Tutoring Systems. New York: Academic Press. [QUIL*: 116, 125; KASS*: 394]

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carberry, S.: Plan Recognition and its Use in Understanding Dialog. In this volume. [WAHL*: 12; RICH*: 39; KOBS*: 59; CHIN*: 78; QUIL*: 129; PARI*: 201; MCCO*: 251; JAME*: 256, 260, 278f.; SPAR*: 361f.; MORI*: 375f.; FINI*: 414]

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chin, D. N.: KNOME: Modeling What the User Knows in UC. In this volume. [WAHL*: 5; RICH*: 36, 51; KOBS*: 57, 60f., 65; QUIL*: 128, 130; CARB*: 160; PARI*: 229; MCCO*: 235; JAME*: 256, 278, 307; SPAR*: 362f.; MORI*: 375, 377; FINI*: 414]

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dolan, C. and M. Dyer (1985): Learning Planning Heuristics through Observation. In: Proc. IJCAI-85, 600–602. [QUIL*: 131]

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dolan, C. and M. Dyer (1986): Encoding Planning Knowledge for Recognition, Construction, and Learning. In: Proc. of the 8th Annual Cognitive Science Society, Amherst, MA, 488–499. [QUIL*: 126, 131]

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dyer, M. (1983): In-Depth Understanding: A Computer Model of Narrative Comprehension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [QUIL*: 111f., 126]

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dyer, M., M. Flowers and J. F. Reeves (1988): Recognizing Situational Ironies: A Computer Model of Irony Recognition and Narrative Understanding. Advances in Computing and the Humanities 1 (in press). [QUIL*: 126]

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fikes, R. E. and N. J. Nilsson (1971): STRIPS: A New Approach to the Application of Theorem Proving to Problem Solving. Artificial Intelligence 2, 189–208. [QUIL*: 111; CARB*: 136]

    Google Scholar 

  14. Flowers, M., R. McGuire and L. Birnbaum (1982): Adversary Arguments and the Logic of Personal Attacks. In: W. Lehnert and M. Ringle, eds.: Strategies for Natural Language Processing. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [QUIL*: 112]

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goodman, B. A. (1986): Miscommunication and Plan Recognition. Paper presented at the International Workshop on User Modeling, Maria Laach, Fed. Rep. of Germany. [QUIL*: 129; SPAR*: 362]

    Google Scholar 

  16. Joshi, A. K., B. Webber and R. M. Weischedel (1984): Living up to Expectations: Computing Expert Responses. In: Proc. AAAI-84, 169–175. [CHIN*: 104; QUIZ*: 126; JAME*: 256; COHE*: 329; FINI*: 414]

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kautz, H. and J. Allen (1986): Generalized Plan Recognition. In: Proc. AAAI-86, 423–427. [QUIL*: 129]

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kemke, C. (1986): The SINIX Consultant: Requirements, Design, and Implementation of an Intelligent Help System for a UNIX Derivative. Report No. 11, AI Laboratory, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Saarbrücken, Fed. Rep. of Germany. [WAHL*: 5, 32; QUIL*: 128]

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kolodner, J. L. (1984): Retrieval and Organizational Strategies in Conceptual Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [QUIL*: 125]

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kolodner, J. L. and R. E. Cullingford (1986): Towards a Memory Architecture that Supports Reminding. In: Proc. of the 8th Annual Cognitive Science Society, Amherst, MA, 467–477. [QUIL*: 125]

    Google Scholar 

  21. McCoy, K. F.: Highlighting a User Model to Respond to Misconceptions. In this volume. [WAHL*: 7, 27; CHIN*: 101; QUIL*: 126; CARB*: 152, 161; PARI*: 201; JAME*: 260; MORI*: 375; FINI*: 416]

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nessen, E. (1987): SC-UM: User Modeling in the SINIX Consultant. Memo No. 18, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Saarbrücken, Fed. Rep. of Germany. [WAHL*: 5; CHIN*: 92; QUIL*: 128]

    Google Scholar 

  23. Paris, C. L.: The Use of Explicit User Models in a Generation System for Tailoring Answers to the User’s Level of Expertise. In this volume. [CHIN*: 107; QUIL*: 130; CARB*: 161; JAME*: 256, 260]

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pollack, M. E. (1986): A Model of Plan Inference that Distinguishes between the Beliefs of Actors and Observers. In: Proc. of the 24th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, New York, NY, 207–214. [WAHL*: 12; QUIL*: 127; CARB*: 136, 143, 153; SPAR*: 362]

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pollack, M. E. (1986): Inferring Domain Plans in Question-Answering. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Computer and Information Science, Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. [WAHL*: 12; QUIL*: 112, 127]

    Google Scholar 

  26. Quilici, A. (1985): Human Problem Understanding and Advice Giving: A Computer Model. Technical Report 85–69, Computer Science Dept., Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA. [QUIL*: 113]

    Google Scholar 

  27. Quilici, A., M. Dyer and M. Flowers (1988): Recognizing and Responding to Plan-Oriented Misconceptions. In: Computational Linguistics 14(3), Special Issue on User Modeling (A. Kobsa and W. Wahlster, eds.), 38–51. [QUEL*: 108; PARI*: 201]

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sacerdoti, E. (1974): Planning in a Hierarchy of Abstraction Spaces. Artificial Intelligence 5, 115–135. [QUIL*: 111]

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schank, R. C. and R. Abelson (1977): Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [QUIL*: 111]

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schank, R. C. (1982): Dynamic Memory. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press. [QUIL*: 125]

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schank, R. C. (1986): Explanation Patterns: Understanding Mechanically and Creatively. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. [QUIL*: 111]

    Google Scholar 

  32. Stevens, A., A. Collins and S. E. Goldin (1982): Misconceptions in Student’s Understanding. In: D. H. Sleeman and J. S. Brown, eds.: Intelligent Tutoring Systems. New York: Academic Press. [QUIL*: 116, 125]

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wilensky, R. (1983): Planning and Understanding. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. [QUIL*: 111]

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wilensky, R., Y. Arens and D. N. Chin (1984): Talking to UNIX in English: An Overview of UC. In: Communications of the ACM 27, 574–593. [WAHL*: 5, 19, 32; CHIN*: 74; QUIL*: 128]

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wilensky, R., J. Mayfield, A. Albert, D. N. Chin, C. Cox, M. Luria, J. Martin and D. Wu (1986): UC: A Progress Report. Technical Report UCB/CSD 87/303, Division of Computer Science, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA. [WAHL*: 5, 19, 32; KOBS*: 60, 65; CHIN*: 74, 78, 82, 87f., 103; QUIL*: 128f.; SPAR*: 362; FINI*: 414f.]

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Quilici, A. (1989). Detecting and Responding to Plan-Oriented Misconceptions. In: Kobsa, A., Wahlster, W. (eds) User Models in Dialog Systems. Symbolic Computation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83230-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83230-7_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-83232-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-83230-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics