Skip to main content

Cross-Cultural Validation of Quality of Life Measures

  • Conference paper
Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives

Summary

Demand is increasing for quality of life measures available for cross-national comparison or aggregation of data across cultures. It is important, therefore, to ensure that an instrument developed in one culture is valid in another. To illustrate an approach to validation, we present a case study of the development of a cross-cultural, quality of life measure specific to genital herpes. The achievement of cross-cultural comparability requires attention to the following issues: 1) the content of the questionnaire and its conceptual basis, 2) the method of translation, and 3) the testing and comparison of reliability, validity, responsiveness, and effect size within each country or culture. In addition to methodological problems, practical considerations include communication difficulties among investigators and the additional expenses involved. Recruiting comparable samples of persons in different countries is also a major challenge to cross-cultural validation. Overcoming these problems will require a higher level of cooperation and coordination between countries. Such studies are lengthy and expensive, requiring commitment of resources and time for the development of valid, reliable, and responsive cross-cultural quality of life measures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aday LA (1989) Designing and Conducting Health Surveys. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardo JW, Hughey JB (1984) The structure of community satisfaction in a British and an American community. J Social Psychol 124(2): 151–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT, Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait- multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 56: 85–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corey L (1989) Genital herpes. In: Holmes K (ed). Sexually transmitted diseases. New York, McGraw-Hill Information Services Company

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Greco L, Walop W, Eastridge L (1987) Questionnaire Development 3. Translation. Can Med Assoc 136: 817–818

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis RF (1991) Scale Development: Theory and Application. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol 26. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi, Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL (1991) Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: statistics and strategies for evaluation. Controlled Clin Trials. 12: 142S-158S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fabrega H (1974) Disease and social behavior: an interdisciplinary perspective. Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming JS, Courtney BE (1984) The dimensionality of self-esteem: II. Hierarchial facet model for revised measurement scales. J Personality Social Psych 46(2): 404–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinot P, Wesnes K (1985) A quality of life scale for the elderly: validation by factor analysis. IRCS Med Sci Psychol Psychiat 13: 9–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G (1987) Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 40(2): 171–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guyatt GH, Deyo RA, Charlson M, Levine MN, Mitchell A (1989) Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: a clarification. J Clin Epidemiol 42(5): 403–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt SM (1993) Cross-cultural comparability of quality of life measures. Drug Info J 1993; 27: 395–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt SM, McKenna S (1992) The QLDS: A scale for the measurement of quality of life in depression. Health Policy 22: 307–319

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH (1989) Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trial 10: 407–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jobe JB, Mingay DJ (1989) Cognitive research improves questionnaires. Am J Public Health. 79(8): 1053–1055

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF (1989) Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 27 (3 suppl):S178-S189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman A, Eisenberg L, Good B (1978) Culture, illness and care: clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research. Ann Int Med 88: 251–258

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lydick E, Epstein RS (1993) Interpretation of quality of life changes. Quality Life Res 2(3): 221–226

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nahmias AJ, Lee FK, Beckman-Nahmias S (1990) Sero-epidemiological and sociological patterns of herpes simplex virus infection in the world. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl 69: 19–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd ed. New York, McGraw-Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick DL, Erickson P (1993) Health status and health policy: allocating resources to health care. New York, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartorius N (1993) A WHO method for the assessment of health-related quality of life (WHOQOL). In: Walker SR and Rosser RM (eds). Quality of life assessment: key issues in the 1990’s. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 201–207

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sherbourne CD, Meredith LS (1992) Quality of self-report data: a comparison of older and younger chronically ill patients. J Gerontol Social Sci 47 (4):S204-S211

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart AL, Ware JE (eds) (1992) Measuring functioning and well-being. The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham and London, Duke University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Testa MA, Anderson RB, Nackley JF, Hollenberg NK (1993) Quality of life and antihypertensive therapy in men: a comparison of Captopril with Enalapril. New Engl J Med 328(13): 907–913

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ware JE (1987) Standards for validating health measures: definition and content. J Chronic Dis 40(6): 473–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wellcome Dialog (1992) Informational Booklet on Genital Herpes. Burroughs Welcome CO

    Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL Group (1993) Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL). Quality Life Res 2: 153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Patrick, D.L., Wild, D.J., Johnson, E.S., Wagner, T.H., Martin, M.A. (1994). Cross-Cultural Validation of Quality of Life Measures. In: Orley, J., Kuyken, W. (eds) Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79123-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79123-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79125-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79123-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics