Summary
Demand is increasing for quality of life measures available for cross-national comparison or aggregation of data across cultures. It is important, therefore, to ensure that an instrument developed in one culture is valid in another. To illustrate an approach to validation, we present a case study of the development of a cross-cultural, quality of life measure specific to genital herpes. The achievement of cross-cultural comparability requires attention to the following issues: 1) the content of the questionnaire and its conceptual basis, 2) the method of translation, and 3) the testing and comparison of reliability, validity, responsiveness, and effect size within each country or culture. In addition to methodological problems, practical considerations include communication difficulties among investigators and the additional expenses involved. Recruiting comparable samples of persons in different countries is also a major challenge to cross-cultural validation. Overcoming these problems will require a higher level of cooperation and coordination between countries. Such studies are lengthy and expensive, requiring commitment of resources and time for the development of valid, reliable, and responsive cross-cultural quality of life measures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aday LA (1989) Designing and Conducting Health Surveys. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco
Bardo JW, Hughey JB (1984) The structure of community satisfaction in a British and an American community. J Social Psychol 124(2): 151–157
Campbell DT, Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait- multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 56: 85–105
Corey L (1989) Genital herpes. In: Holmes K (ed). Sexually transmitted diseases. New York, McGraw-Hill Information Services Company
Del Greco L, Walop W, Eastridge L (1987) Questionnaire Development 3. Translation. Can Med Assoc 136: 817–818
DeVellis RF (1991) Scale Development: Theory and Application. Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol 26. Newbury Park, London, New Delhi, Sage Publications.
Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL (1991) Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures: statistics and strategies for evaluation. Controlled Clin Trials. 12: 142S-158S
Fabrega H (1974) Disease and social behavior: an interdisciplinary perspective. Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press
Fleming JS, Courtney BE (1984) The dimensionality of self-esteem: II. Hierarchial facet model for revised measurement scales. J Personality Social Psych 46(2): 404–421
Guinot P, Wesnes K (1985) A quality of life scale for the elderly: validation by factor analysis. IRCS Med Sci Psychol Psychiat 13: 9–10
Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G (1987) Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 40(2): 171–178
Guyatt GH, Deyo RA, Charlson M, Levine MN, Mitchell A (1989) Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: a clarification. J Clin Epidemiol 42(5): 403–408
Hunt SM (1993) Cross-cultural comparability of quality of life measures. Drug Info J 1993; 27: 395–400
Hunt SM, McKenna S (1992) The QLDS: A scale for the measurement of quality of life in depression. Health Policy 22: 307–319
Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH (1989) Measurement of health status: ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trial 10: 407–415
Jobe JB, Mingay DJ (1989) Cognitive research improves questionnaires. Am J Public Health. 79(8): 1053–1055
Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF (1989) Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 27 (3 suppl):S178-S189
Kleinman A, Eisenberg L, Good B (1978) Culture, illness and care: clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research. Ann Int Med 88: 251–258
Lydick E, Epstein RS (1993) Interpretation of quality of life changes. Quality Life Res 2(3): 221–226
Nahmias AJ, Lee FK, Beckman-Nahmias S (1990) Sero-epidemiological and sociological patterns of herpes simplex virus infection in the world. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl 69: 19–36
Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd ed. New York, McGraw-Hill
Patrick DL, Erickson P (1993) Health status and health policy: allocating resources to health care. New York, Oxford University Press
Sartorius N (1993) A WHO method for the assessment of health-related quality of life (WHOQOL). In: Walker SR and Rosser RM (eds). Quality of life assessment: key issues in the 1990’s. Boston, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 201–207
Sherbourne CD, Meredith LS (1992) Quality of self-report data: a comparison of older and younger chronically ill patients. J Gerontol Social Sci 47 (4):S204-S211
Stewart AL, Ware JE (eds) (1992) Measuring functioning and well-being. The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham and London, Duke University Press
Testa MA, Anderson RB, Nackley JF, Hollenberg NK (1993) Quality of life and antihypertensive therapy in men: a comparison of Captopril with Enalapril. New Engl J Med 328(13): 907–913
Ware JE (1987) Standards for validating health measures: definition and content. J Chronic Dis 40(6): 473–480
Wellcome Dialog (1992) Informational Booklet on Genital Herpes. Burroughs Welcome CO
WHOQOL Group (1993) Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL). Quality Life Res 2: 153–159
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Patrick, D.L., Wild, D.J., Johnson, E.S., Wagner, T.H., Martin, M.A. (1994). Cross-Cultural Validation of Quality of Life Measures. In: Orley, J., Kuyken, W. (eds) Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79123-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-79123-9_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-79125-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-79123-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive