Abstract
A predator’s diet is the array of food types eaten by that predator. From an ecological and evolutionary standpoint, diets are particularly interesting when predators show non-random preferences; that is, when the relative abundances of different prey types in the diet differ from a random sampling of the environment (Chesson 1983). Non-random diets are ecologically important, because the effects of predators on prey communities often appear to be mediated by non-random predation (Paine 1966; Zaret 1980; Sih et al. 1985). Given that predator preferences are ecologically important, ecologists have been interested in the determinants of preference. In behavioral ecology, the dominant theme has been to interpret behavior in terms of its adaptive significance (Krebs and Davies 1984). To explain non-random diets, behavioral ecologists have used optimal diet theory (ODT) which, in its simpler forms predicts diets based on the notion that predators choose prey types that result in maximum net energy intake (Stephens and Krebs 1986).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literature Cited
Allan JD, Flecker AS (1988) Prey preference in stoneflies: a comparative analysis of prey vulnerability. Oecologia 76: 496–503
Allan JD, Flecker AS, McClintock NL (1987) Prey preference of stoneflies: sedentary vs. mobile prey. Oikos 49: 323–331
Anholt B (1986) Prey selection by the predatory leech Nephelopsis obscura in relation to three alternative models of foraging. Can J Zool 64: 649–655
Arnold SJ, Wade MJ (1984) On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: Theory. Evolution 38: 709–719
Bertram BC (1978) Living in groups: predators and prey. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Oxford pp 64–96
Chesson J (1983) The estimation and analysis of preference and its relationship to foraging models. Ecology 64: 1297–1304
Cooper SD, Smith DW, Bence JR (1985) Prey selection by freshwater predators with different foraging strategies. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42: 1720–1732
Erlinge S (1981) Food preference, optimal diet and reproductive output in stoats Mustela erminea in Sweden. Oikos 36: 303–315
Greene CH, Landry MR (1985) Patterns of prey selection in the cruising calanoid predator Enchaeta elonqata. Ecology 66: 1408–1416
Greene, CH, Landry MR, Monger BC (1986) Foraging behavior and prey selection by the ambush entangling predator Pleurobrachia bachei. Ecology 67: 1493–1501
Hassell MP (1978) The dynamics of arthropod predation. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Krebs JR, Davies NB (1984) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer, Sunderland
Lande R, Arnold SJ (1983) The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210–1226
Li CC (1976) First course in population genetics. Boxwood, Pacific Grove
Mitchell-Olds T, Shaw RG (1987) Regression analysis of natural selection: statistical inference and biological interpretation. Evolution 41: 1149–1161
Paine RT (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. Am Nat 100: 65–75
Pastorok RA (1981) Prey vulnerability and size selection by Chaoborus larvae. Ecology 62: 1311–1324
Petranka JW, Kats LB, Sih A (1987) Predator-prey interactions among fish and larval amphibians: use of chemical cues to detect predatory fish. Anim Behav 35: 426–434
Pulliam HR, Caraco T (1984) Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? In: Krebs, JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Sinauer, Sunderland pp 122–147
Riessen HP, O’Brien WJ, Loveless B (1984) An analysis of the components of Chaoborus predation on zooplankton and the calculation of relative prey vulnerabilities. Ecology 65: 514–522
Scott MA, Murdoch WW (1983) Selective predation by the backswimmer, Notonecta. Limnol Oceanogr 28: 352-366
Sih A, Crowley PH, McPeek MA, Petranka JW, Strohmeier K (1985) Predation, competition, and prey communities: A review of field experiments. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 16: 269–311
Sih A (1987a) Predators and prey lifestyles: an evolutionary and ecological overview. In: Kerfoot WS, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover pp 203–224
Sih A (1987b) Nutritional ecology of aquatic insect predators. In: Slansky F, Rodriguez, JG (eds) Nutritional ecology of insects, mites and spiders. Wiley and Sons
Spitze K (1985) Functional response of an ambush predator: Chaoborus americanus predation on Daphnia pulex. Ecology 66: 938–949
Stein RA (1977) Selective predation, optimal foraging, and the predator-prey interaction between fish and crayfish. Ecology 58: 1237–1253
Stephens DW, Krebs JR (1986) Foraging theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton Zaret TM ( 1980 ) Predation and freshwater communities. Yale University Press, New Haven
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sih, A., Moore, R.D. (1990). Interacting Effects of Predator and Prey Behavior in Determining Diets. In: Hughes, R.N. (eds) Behavioural Mechanisms of Food Selection. NATO ASI Series, vol 20. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75118-9_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75118-9_37
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-75120-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75118-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive