Skip to main content

Humic Substances Removal by Alum Coagulation — Direct Filtration at Low pH

  • Conference paper
Pretreatment in Chemical Water and Wastewater Treatment

Abstract

The potential of using alum for the coagulation of humic substances was evaluated by treating a colored surface water. Jar testing revealed that only one major removal domain existed with pH=5.5 being an optimum pH value. Sedimentation as well as filtration behaviour of the floes was studied between pH = 4.7 and pH = 7. For the latter experiments, sand filters of different bed lengths were used. While sedimentation worked best at pH = 6, filtration efficiency was best for pH < 5. From the point of view of floe separation by direct filtration, therefore, conducting the process at pH < 5 offers advantages. However, the kinetics of floe formation were found to depend on pH, that is, they were much slower at pH = 4 compared to pH = 6. Data from preliminary technical-scale experiments conducted with the same raw water are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Odegaard, H., Brattebo, H., Eikebrokk, B., Thorsen, T. (1986) Wat Supp 4,129

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eikebrokk, B. (1987) Report 55/86, NTNF program VAR-teknikk, Trondheim

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eikebrokk, B. (1982) Ph.D. dissert., Norwegian Inst. Technol, Trondheim

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eikebrokk, B. (1984) Report 6/84, NTNF program VAR-teknikk, Trondheim

    Google Scholar 

  5. Committee report (1979) J. AWWA 71, 588

    Google Scholar 

  6. Committee report (1980) J. AWWA 72, 405

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dempsey B. A., Ganho, R.M., O’Melia, C.R. (1984) J. AWWA 76, 141

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Edwards, G. A, Amirtharajah, A. (1985), J. AWWA 77, 50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hall, E.S., Packham, R.F. (1965) J. AWWA 57, 1149

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Babcock, D.B., Singer, P.C. (1979) J. AWWA 71, 149

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Albert, G. (1975) in: Publ. Water Chemistry Div., Vol. 9. Engler-Bunte-Inst. Karlsruhe University

    Google Scholar 

  12. Randtke, S J., Jepsen, C.P. (1981) J. AWWA 73, 411

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Weber, W J., Jodellah, A.M. (1985) J. AWWA 77, 132

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vik, E.A., Carlson, D.A., Eikum, A.S., Gjessing, E.T. (1985) J. AWWA 77, 58

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Knocke, W.R., West, S., Hoehn, R.C. (1986) J. AWWA 78, 189

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Semmens, M J., Field, T.K. (1980) J. AWWA 72, 476

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Edzwald, J.K., Becker, W.C., Tambini, S J. (1987) J. Environm. Engrg. 113, 167

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chadik, P.A., Amy, G.L. (1983) J. AWWA 75, 532

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Snodgrass, W. J., Clark, M.M., O’Melia, C.R. (1984) Water Res. 18, 479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gibbs, R. J. (1982) Environm. Sci. Technol. 16, 298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Reed, G.D., Mery, P.C. (1986) J. AWWA 78, 75

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bakkes, C.A., Tipping, E. (1987) Water Res. 21, 211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wagner, E.G., Hudson, H.E. (1982) J. AWWA 74, 256

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. TeKippe, R J., Ham, R.K. (1970) J. AWWA 62, 594

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Klute, R., Bernhardt, H., Hahn, H.H., Schell, H. (1979): Zeitschr. Wasser Abwasser Forsch. 11, 193

    Google Scholar 

  26. Treweek, G.P. (1979) J. AWWA 71, 96

    Google Scholar 

  27. Habibian, M.T., O’Melia, C.R. (1975) J. Environm. Engrg. 101, 567

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yeh, H.H., Gosh, M.M. (1981) J. AWWA 73, 211

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Scheuch, L.E., Edzwald, J.K. (1981) J. AWWA 73, 497

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Collins, M.R., Amy, G.L., Bryant, C.W. (1987) J. Environm. Engrg. 113, 330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Vråie, L. (1985) In: Proc. 1st Gothenburg Symp., Grohmann, A., Hahn, H.H., Klute, R. (eds.), Fischer, Stuttgart, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fettig, J., Ødegaard, H., Eikebrokk, B. (1988). Humic Substances Removal by Alum Coagulation — Direct Filtration at Low pH. In: Hahn, H.H., Klute, R. (eds) Pretreatment in Chemical Water and Wastewater Treatment. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73819-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73819-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-73821-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-73819-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics