Abstract
Two metatheories have dominated psychological studies of memory and of time during this century. Although the historical pattern of adoption of these metatheoretical approaches overlaps somewhat, one of them is clearly older. The older metatheory has roots in the behavioristic and neobehavioristic psychology of the earlier part of this century, but it extends it; branches into some recent information processing psychology. I refer to this as a stimulus-based approach, because it emphasizes memory for stimulus events per se.The newer metatheory originates in some cognitive psychology of the later part of this century. I refer to this as a context-based approach, because it emphasizes contextual coding in memory.
Some of the research described here was work supported by National Science Foundation Grant ISP-8011449.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Block, R. A. Memory and the experience of duration in retrospect. Memory & Cognition, 1974, 2, 153–160.
Block, R. A. Remembered duration: Effects of event and sequence complexity. Memory & Cognition, 1978, 6, 320–326.
Block, R. A. Time and consciousness. In: G. Underwood & R. Stevens (Eds.), Aspects of consciousness: Vol. 1. Psychological issues. London: Academic Press, 1979, pp. 179–217.
Block, R.A. Temporal judgments and contextual change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1982, 8, 530–544.
Block, R. A., George, E. J., & Reed, M. A. A watched pot sometimes boils: A study of duration experience. Acta Psychologica, 1980, 46, 81–94.
Block, R. A., & Reed, M. A. Remembered duration: Evidence for a contextual-change hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1978, 4, 656–665.
Bransford, J. D. Human cognition: Learning, understanding, and remembering. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1979.
Estes, W. K. Is human memory obsolete? American Scientist, 1980, 68, 62–69.
Fraisse, R Perception and estimation of time. Annual Review of Psychology, 1984, 35, 1–36.
Hoffman, R. R., & Nead, J. M. General contextualism, ecological science and cognitive research. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 1983, 4, 507–560.
Jenkins, J. J. Remember that old theory of memory? Well, forget it! American Psychologist, 1974, 29, 785–795.
Jenkins, J.J. Four points to remember: A tetrahedral model of memory experiments. In: L.S. Cermak & F.I.M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing and human memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1979, pp. 429–446.
Ornstein, R. E. On the experience of time. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books, 1969.
Pepper, S. C. World hypotheses. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1942.
Poynter, W. D. Duration judgment and the segmentation of experience. Memory & Cognition, 1983, 11, 77–82.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1984.
Underwood, B.J. Temporal codes for memories: Issues and problems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1977.
Underwood, G. Attention and the perception of duration during encoding and retrieval. Perception, 1975, 4, 291–296.
Vroon, PA. Effects of presented and processed information on duration experience. Acta Psychologica, 1910, 34, 115–121.
Reference Note
Block, R. A. Remembered duration: Imagery processes and contextual encoding. Manuscript in preparation, 1984.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1985 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Block, R.A. (1985). Contextual Coding in Memory: Studies of Remembered Duration. In: Michon, J.A., Jackson, J.L. (eds) Time, Mind, and Behavior. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70491-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70491-8_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-70493-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-70491-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive