Abstract
The major implication of discovering a new chemical carcinogen, whether synthetic of natural, is that it may present a carcinogenic risk to exposed populations. Only in cases where significant manufacturing or environmental human exposure to that chemical exists will a possible human carcinogenic hazard exist. It is therefore desirable that a system of hazard assessment should be devised. The above approach assumes that chemical carcinogens are easily and clearly definable — but such, of course, is not the case. One of the major causes of confusion in this area is the fear felt by many that insufficient or circumstantial evidence of carcinogenicity will be used to stimulate the response usually reserved for established human carcinogens. For example, few people would disagree with attempts to remove a recognizable source of potential hazard, such as the presence of a potent animal carcinogen in drinking water, but many would question whether abrupt action should be taken on finding that hamburgers contain chemicals mutagenic to S. typhimurium.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ashby J, Styles JA, Paton D (1978) In vitro Evaluation of some derivatives of the carcinogen butter yellow: implications for environmental screening. Br J Cancer 38:34–50
Ashby J, Styles JA (1978) Comutagenicity, competitive enzyme substrates, and in vitro carcinogenicity assays. Mutat Res 54:105–112
Ashby J, Styles JA, Anderson D, Paton D (1978) Saccharin: an epigenetic carcinogen mutagen? Fd Cosmet Toxicol 16:95–103
Ashby J, Styles JA, Paton D (1978) Potentially carcinogenic analogues of the carcinogen hexamethylphosphoramide (HMPA). Br J Cancer 38:418–427
Ashby J, Anderson D, Styles JA (1978) The potential carcinogenicity of methyl fluorosulphonate (CH3OSO2F; Magic Methyl). Mutat Res 51:285–287
Ashby J, Purchase IFH (1977) The selection of appropriate chemical class controls for use with short-term tests for potential carcinogenicity. Ann Occup Hyg 20:297–301
Ashby J, Styles JA, Anderson D (1977) Selection of an in vitro carcinogenicity test for derivatives of the carcinogen hexamethylphosphoramide. Br J Cancer 36:564–571
Ashby J, Styles JA (1978) Does carcinogenic potency correlate with mutagenic potency in the Ames assay? Nature 271:452–455
Ashby J, Styles JA (1978) Does carcinogenic potency correlate with mutagenic potency in the Ames assay? Nature 274:19–22
Ashby, J, Anderson D, Styles JA, Paton D (1978) Thiophene analogues of the carcinogens benzidine and 4-aminobiphenyl: evaluation in vitro. Br J Cancer 38:521–530
Purchase IFH, Longstaff E, Ashby J, Styles JA, Anderson D, Lefevre PA, Westwood FR (1978) An evaluation of six short-term tests for detecting organic chemical carcinogens. Br J Cancer 32:873–959 (in particular, Appendix I, 904–923)
Crabtree HG (1955) Retardation of azo-carcinogenesis by non-carcinogenic azo-compounds. Br J Cancer 9:310–317
Wattehberg LW (1978) Inhibitors of chemical carcinogenesis. Adv Cancer Res 26:197–226
Moriya M, Kato K, Shirasu Y (1978) Effects of cysteine and liver metabolic activation system on the activities of mutagenic pesticides. Mutat Res 57:259–263
Rosin MP, Stich HF (1978) The inhibitory effect of cysteine on the mutagenic activities of several carcinogenesis. Mutat Res 54/73–81
Yamamoto RS, Williams GM, Richardson HL, Weisburgher EK, Weisburgher JH (1978) Effects of p-hydroxyacetanilide on liver cancer induction by N-hydroxy-N-2-fluorenylacetamide. Cancer Res 33:454
Vesely DL, Levy GS (1978) Saccharin inhibits guanylate cyclase activity — possible relationship to carcinogenesis, Biochem Biophys Res Commun 81:1384
Kohli K, Venkitasubramanian TA (1978) Effect of dieldrin toxicity on pyridine nucleotides and activities of NADH and NADPH oxidase in rat liver. Chem Biol Interact 21:337–341
Nagao M, Yahagi T, Kawachi T, Sugimura T, Kosuge T, Tsuji K, Wakabayashi K, Mizusaki S, Matsumototo T (1977) Comutagenic action of norharman and harman. Proc Jpn Acad 53:95–98
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ashby, J. (1980). The Significance and Interpretation of in Vitro Carcinogenicity Assay Results. In: Norpoth, K.H., Garner, R.C. (eds) Short-Term Test Systems for Detecting Carcinogens. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67202-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-67202-6_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-67204-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-67202-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive