Skip to main content

Classification of Trace Fossils

  • Chapter
The Study of Trace Fossils

Synopsis

Classification is one of the tools of scientific discovery, no less so in the study of trace fossils than in any other science. Many different kinds of classification are possible. Simple descriptive classifications, although better than nothing, are of very limited value. Trace fossils have three distinct and significant aspects, to each of which a unique classification attaches: (1) the preservational (stratinomic), which treats of the origin of the fossil in the rocks, (2) the behavioral (ethological), which treats of the biological function represented in the fossil, and (3) the phylogenetic (taxonomic), which is concerned with the identity of the organism that produced the fossil.

Relationships established in the stratinomic classification are limited in number and are informative mainly about the characteristics of sedimentation when and where fossilization took place. The ethological classification is generally the most appropriate, because it provides insight into the environment at the time of formation. The taxonomic classification is of very limited applicability; phyletic identifications are possible only in a few cases, mainly certain tracks or trails.

Agreed nomenclatural procedures, involving the acceptance of a code for a binomial system of names related to types, are beset with difficulties. But if any nomenclature is devised for international adoption, it should be based on a classification of trace fossils as the product of organic behavioral patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bromley, R. G. 1970. Borings as trace fossils andEntobia cretacea Portlock, as an example. In T. P. Crimes and J. C. Harper (eds.), Trace fossils. Geol. Jour., Spec. Issue 3:49–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Raaf, J. F. M. et al. 1965. Cyclic sedimentation in the lower Westphalian of North Devon, England. Sedimentology, 4:1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, D. and S. Simpson. 1962. Chomatichnus, a new ichnogenus, and other trace fossils of Wegber Quarry. Liverpool and Manchr. Geol. Jour., 3:73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, M. and R. A. Davis. 1967. Lebensspuren photographed on the ocean floor. Johns Hopkins Oceanogr. Stud., 3:259–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, L. 1965. A note on the emplacement of sediment in the tracefossil Chondrites. Geol. Soc. London, Proc., 1622:79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, R. W. 1971. Ichnology—the study of fossil and recent lebensspuren. In B. F. Perkins (ed.), Trace fossils, a field guide. Louisiana State Univ., School Geosci., Misc. Publ. 71–1:91–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1973. Concepts in the study of biogenic sedimentary structures. Jour. Sed. Petrol., 43:6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldring, R. 1962. The trace fossils of the Baggy Beds (Upper Devonian) of North Devon, England. Paläont. Zeitschr., 36:232–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häntzschel, W. 1962. Trace fossils and problematic. In R. C. Moore (ed.), Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, Pt. W, Miscellanea. Lawrence, Kan., Geol. Soc. America and Univ. Kansas Press, p. W177-W245.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— and O. Kraus. 1972. Names based on trace fossils (ichnotaxa): request for a recommendation. Bull. Zool. Nomencl., 29: 137–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— et al. 1968. Coprolites, an annotated bibliography. Geol. Soc. America, Mem. 108:1–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, P. G. 1970. Aspects of paleoecology in the arenaceous sediments of Upper Carboniferous age in the area around Manchester. Unpubl. Ph.D. Dissert., Victoria Univ. Manchester, 211 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, W. J. et al. 1969. AFavreina-Thalassinoides association from the Great Oolite of Oxfordshire. Palaeontology, 12:549–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessertisseur, J. 1955. Traces fossiles d’activité animale et leur signification paléobiologique. Soc. Géol. France, Mém. (N. Ser.) 74:1–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMaster, R. L. 1958. Modification of underwater surface sediment layers by sea mussels(Mytilus edulis). Jour. Sed. Petrol., 28:515–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinsson, A. 1965. Aspects of a Middle Cambrian thanatotope on Öland. Geol. Foren. I Stockholm Förhand., 87:171–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1970. Toponomy of trace fossils. In T. P. Crimes and J. C. Harper (eds.), Trace fossils. Geol. Jour., Spec. Issue 3:323–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, R. G., Jr. 1970. Trace fossils of the Cincinnati area. Palaeontographica Amer., 6(41):281–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, D. C. and D. J. Stanley. 1965. Biogenic graded bedding. Jour. Sed. Petrol., 36:1144–1149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, R. 1927. Die fossilien Fährten und Bauten der Würmer. Paläont. Zeitschr., 9: 193–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarjeant, W. A. S. and W. J. Kennedy. 1973. Proposal of a code for the nomenclature of trace fossils. Canadian Jour. Earth Sci., 10: 460–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, W. 1972. Ecology and palaeoecology of marine environments. Edinburgh and Chicago, Oliver 8c Boyd and Univ. of Chicago Press, 568 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seilacher, A. 1953. Studien zur Palichnologie. I. Uber die Methoden der Palichnologie. Neues Jahrb. Geol. Paläont., Abh., 98:87–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1964. Biogenic sedimentary structures. In J. Imbrie and N. D. Newell (eds.), Approaches to paleoecology. New York, John Wiley, p. 296–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1964. Sedimentological classification and nomenclature of trace fossils. Sedimentology, 3:253–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1970. Cruziana stratigraphy of “non-fossiliferous” Palaeozoic sandstones. In T. P. Crimes and J. C. Harper (eds.), Trace fossils. Geol. Jour., Spec. Issue 3:447–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S. 1957. On the trace fossilChondrites. Geol. Soc. London, Quart. Jour., 112:475–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1970. Notes onZoophycos andSpiro-phyton. In T. P. Crimes and J. C. Harper (eds.), Trace fossils. Geol. Jour., Spec. Issue 3:505–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauber, A. F. 1949. Paläobiologische Analyse vonChondrites furcatus Sternberg. Jahrb. Geol. Bundesamt., 92:141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vialov, O. S. 1972. The classification of the fossil traces of life. 24th Internat. Geol. Congr., Montreal, Sect. 7:639–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webby, B. D. 1969. Trace fossils (Pascichnia) from the Silurian of New South Wales, Australia. Paläont. Zeitschr., 43:81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigelt, J. 1928. Rezente Wirbeltierleichen und Ihre Bedeutung für die Paläontologie. Paläont. Zeitschr., 9:327–328.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simpson, S. (1975). Classification of Trace Fossils. In: Frey, R.W. (eds) The Study of Trace Fossils. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-65923-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-65923-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-65925-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-65923-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics