Skip to main content

Some Thoughts on MCDM: Myths and Ideas

  • Conference paper
Multicriteria Analysis

Abstract

Decision making is a most important function and process of management. It is one of the most pervasive problems of management and a pervasive problem in general. Multiple criteria decision making is an approach to decision making. It is the making of decisions taking into consideration multiple conflicting objectives. How do we make decisions? What is involved? There are many simple paradigms, and until recently about all that could be said was that you should list the alternatives, score them on certain dimensions, and then somehow aggregate the scores, and choose an alternative. Unfortunately, many excellent decision makers simply choose an alternative, based on instinct, intuition, or feel. Then they go on. Though that is fine in many cases; in some cases it is not. In this paper I consider some myths of decision making. I then propose some steps that we, as decision analysts and scientists, should consider taking to try to sensitize decision makers to thinking more about their decisions and making better decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. V. Belton and Visual Thinking International, Ltd., V*I*S*A for Windows User Guide. Visual Thinking International Ltd., 141 St. James Road, Glasgow, UK G4 OLT.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Kasanen, H. Wallenius, J. Wallenius, and S. Zionts, A Study of High-Level Managerial Decision Processes, with Implications for Decision Science Research, Working Paper Number 783, School of Management, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14260–4000, October, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lotfi, V., Stewart, T. J., and Zionts, S., "An Aspiration-Level Interactive Model for Multiple Criteria Decision Making", Computers and Operations Research. Vol. 19, No. 7, 671–681, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Parton, J., Life and Times of Benjamin Franklin. Vol. I, New York: Mason Brothers, p. 547, (1864)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roy, B., "Classement et Choix en Presence de Points de Vue Multiples (La Methode ELECTRE)", Revue d’Informatique et de Recherche Operationelle, 8, 57– 75 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wierzbicki, A. P., "The Use of Reference Objectives in Multiobjective Optimization," Working Paper 79-66, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria (1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zoints, S. (1997). Some Thoughts on MCDM: Myths and Ideas. In: Clímaco, J. (eds) Multicriteria Analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60667-0_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60667-0_60

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64500-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60667-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics