Abstract
Applications of decision theory for multiple criteria or multiple attributes often assume a Utility representation for preferences that is additive over criteria or attributes. Axiomatic theories for additive Utilities are well developed but are not without gaps. A case in point arises with finite sets of alternatives, where two preference axioms are necessary and sufficient for additive Utilities. One is weak ordering. The other is a cancellation ax-iom that consists of an infinite scheme of cancellation conditions, one for each positive integer K ≥ 2. It is known that the infinite scheme can be truncated to a finite scheme for K ≤ K* that depends on the size of the set of alternatives, but very little is known about the value of K* which ensures additivity for all finite sets of that size. The present paper contributes to the determination of K*. A fundamental result is that if there are m attributes, the j th of which has n j elements in its attribute set, then Σn j - (m - 1) is an upper bound on K*. Lower bounds on K* that are near to this upper bound are obtained for special cases of (n1, n2, ..., nm.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Farquhar, P. H. and V. R. Rao, A balance model for evaluating subsets of multiattributed items, Management Science 22 (1976), 528–539.
Fishburn, P. C., Utility Theory for Decision Making, Wiley, New York, 1970.
Fishburn, P. C., Interdependent preferences on finite sets, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 9 (1972), 225–236.
Fishburn, P. C., Lexicographic Orders, Utilities, and decision rules: A survey, Management Science 20 (1974), 1442–1471.
Fishburn, P. C., Axioms for lexicographic preferences, Review of Economic Studies 42 (1975), 415–419.
Fishburn, P. C., Approximations of two-attribute utility functions, Mathematics of Operations Research 2(1977), 30–44.
Fishburn, P. C., A general axiomatization of additive measurement with applications, Naval Research Logistics 39(1992), 741–755.
Fishburn, P. C., Finite linear qualitative probability, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 40 (1996), 64–77.
Fishburn, P. C., Failures of cancellation conditions for additive linear orders, AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ, 1995.
Fishburn, P. C. and I. H. LaValle, Binary interactions and subset choice, European Journal of Operational Research 92 (1996), 182–192.
Keeney, R. L. and H. Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives, Wiley, New York, 1976.
Kraft, C. H., J. W. Pratt and A. Seidenberg, Intuitive probability on finite sets, Annals of Mathematical Statistics 30 (1959), 408–419.
Krantz, D. H., R. D. Luce, P. Suppes and A. Tversky, Foundations of Measurement, Volume I, Academic Press, New York, 1971.
Leung, P., Sensitivity analysis of the effect of variations in the form and parameters of a multiattribute utility model: A survey, Behavioral Science 23 (1978), 478–485.
Scott, D., Measurement structures and linear inequalities, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1(1964), 233–247.
Sherman, B. F., An algorithm for finite conjoint additivity, Journal of Mathematical Psychology 16 (1977), 204–218.
Wakker, P. P., Additive Representations of Preferences, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1989.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fishburn, P.C. (1997). Cancellation Conditions for Multiattribute Preferences on Finite Sets. In: Karwan, M.H., Spronk, J., Wallenius, J. (eds) Essays In Decision Making. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60663-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60663-2_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64499-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60663-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive