Skip to main content

Errors in inverse treatment planning based on inaccurate dose calculation

  • Conference paper
The Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy

Abstract

Inverse treatment planning, which enables intensity modulated radiation treatment (EV1RT), is quickly entering into clinical practice. One of the key ingredients of any inverse, as well as conventional treatment planning systems, is the used dose calculation algorithm. Ideally, the dose calculation algorithm should be accurate and fast; however, there is always some trade off between accuracy and speed. Most of the current inverse treatment algorithms use fast dose calculation algorithms, usually based on pencil beam or convolution/ superposition approach [1–4]. These algorithms work well for many clinical cases, but there are some examples where systematic errors of several percent may occur [5,6]. On the other hand, Monte Carlo based dose calculations are known for their accuracy, but they are also burdened with some statistical error, which introduces different type of problems [7].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. T. Bortfeld, W. Schlegel and B. Rein 1993, Decomposition of pencil beam kernels for fast dose calculation in three-dimensional treatment planning, Med. Phys. 20, 311–318.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mackie T R, Holmes T W, Swedloff S et al 1993, Tomotherapy: A new concept for the delivery of dynamic conformal radiotherapy, Med. Phys. 20(6), 1709–1719.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Preiser K, Bortfeld T, Harwig K, Schlegel W and Stein J, A new program for inverse radiotherapy planning, Proceedings of the International Conference on the Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy, Utah, USA, 425–428.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Holmes T, Bleier A, Carlo M, Curran B et al 1998 The CORVUS dose model revealed, Med. Phys. 25(7), A144.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mohan R 1997, Why Monte Carlo?, Proceedings of the International Conference on the Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy, Utah, USA, 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nahum A E 1997, Conformal therapy needs Monte-Carlo dose computation, Proceeding of Challenges in Conformal Radiotherapy, Nice, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jeraj R and Keall P J 1999, Effect of noise on Monte Carlo based inverse treatment planning, To be submitted to Phys. Med. Biol.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jeraj R and Keall P J, Monte Carlo based inverse treatment planning, Phys. Med. Biol. 44, (1999), 1885–1896.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Keall P J, Siebers J V and Mohan R, Acceptance testing and commissioning tests for a Monte Carlo-based photon dose calculation algorithm, Medical College of Virginia Internal Report, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ahnesjö A 1989, Collapsed cone convolution of radiant energy for photon dose calculation in heterogeneous media, Med. Phys. 16(4), 577–592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jeraj, R., Keall, P. (2000). Errors in inverse treatment planning based on inaccurate dose calculation. In: Schlegel, W., Bortfeld, T. (eds) The Use of Computers in Radiation Therapy. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59758-9_205

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59758-9_205

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67176-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59758-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics